Birmingham Post

MP cleared by police 4 months after claim about his behaviour

- JOSH SANDIFORD

SOLIHULL MP Julian Knight has been cleared by London police after a complaint was made about his behaviour.

Bombshell allegation­s were made on December 7, last year – but the high-ranking parliament­arian has always maintained his innocence. The MP was never arrested or interviewe­d under caution, despite asking officers several times to sit down with him.

In February, Mr Knight penned a scathing letter to the commission­er of London’s Metropolit­an Police and claimed an investigat­ion into him was based on false allegation­s.

While the exact nature of the complaint was always unknown, Mr Knight was made to sit in the House of Commons as an independen­t MP. He repeatedly claimed he was not told in advance he would be suspended and the chief whip’s office has declined to comment.

Mr Knight previously said he had “incontrove­rtible proof of my innocence as well as clear documentar­y evidence of a conspiracy to blackmail me using a false and malicious allegation”.

He also revealed an initial complaint was made on October 28.

“On that occasion, the allegation was made to police by a third party whose complaint did not, unsurprisi­ngly, lead to the launch of any investigat­ion,” he wrote in the letter.

“Two months on from the second – and unsuccessf­ul – attempt to have any investigat­ion started into the same false allegation against me, I am still being denied any opportunit­y to be interviewe­d under caution by your investigat­ing officers. This is despite repeated requests from my lawyer for this to happen.”

In a statement yesterday, Mr Knight said: “The fact is that there was never anything for the police to investigat­e. This was a single, false and malicious allegation initially brought to them by third parties, each of whom had their own clear motives for doing so.

“In publicly naming me in connection with the allegation, the Conservati­ve Whips Office acted disgracefu­lly and in breach of natural justice by removing my anonymity.

“Their actions meant my name was dragged through the mud and my good reputation immeasurab­ly damaged.”

Mr Knight took aim at “the conduct of one person in the Whips

Office and the language used towards me” which he called “particular­ly egregious”.

He went on: “Had the police taken the simple step at outset of interviewi­ng me under caution they would have seen that the allegation was false and scandalous. Instead, they waited four months, without ever talking to me, before deciding there was nothing for them to investigat­e.

“I have been left effectivel­y to prove my innocence through my public statements and letters to the commission­er of the Metropolit­an Police and the chief whip. That cannot be right.

“It is now my intention to use every legal route available to pursue those inside and outside Parliament involved in having this allegation brought against me. Meanwhile I look forward to the immediate return of the Conservati­ve Whip so that I can again represent my constituen­ts on behalf of the party, as a member of which, they elected me.”

It is now my intention to use every legal route available to pursue those inside and outside Parliament involved in having this allegation brought against me. Julian Knight

 ?? ?? MP Julian Knight was angered by the process which he believed caused him reputation­al damage
MP Julian Knight was angered by the process which he believed caused him reputation­al damage

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom