Birmingham Post

Import charge is a body blow for our nation of shopkeeper­s

- Nasir Awan Dr Nasir Awan MBE DL is president of Greater Birmingham Chambers of Commerce and CEO of Awan Marketing Internatio­nal

THERE has been growing unease from importers and supply chains over the past week at the government’s stance on plant and animal product imports from the EU.

It follows an announceme­nt from the Department for Environmen­t, Food and Rural Affairs (DEFRA) that a “common user charge” will come into effect from this month.

It’s hardly surprising that businesses and trade bodies have been lining up to vent their concerns at this developmen­t, which will almost certainly drive up food prices and deter producers in the EU from exporting to the UK.

This developmen­t is also deeply concerning for retailers, cafes and restaurant­s, many of whom are already having to contend with rising costs and shrinking margins.

DEFRA announced that, from

April 30, consignmen­ts of EU plant and animal products will face charges of up to £145 when imported into Britain.

The charges will apply to all consignmen­ts entering the UK via government-run border controls at Dover and the Eurotunnel, which handle the majority of UK food

imports. Under the new proposals, those importing a small consignmen­t of goods with only five different meat, poultry, egg, milk or some fish products in the ‘mediumrisk’ category will now face a bill of £145 per package.

These costly import fees will hit small and medium-sized importers particular­ly hard.

DEFRA argues that these charges are at the “bottom end” of the range. Yet, it remains an expensive hammer blow for smaller companies, many of

whom will reach the maximum £145 per consignmen­t charge, on top of port authority charges on loads selected for inspection.

The biggest concern is for those who rely on groupage imports, such as delis, independen­t retailers and fresh produce importers.

They will face some of the highest fees due to the nature of their mixed loads.

For some, it may even mean the end of trade with the European Union altogether.

The over-arching outcome of all of this, of course, is more misery for the consumer.

Representa­tives of various trade bodies fear the charges will discourage EU producers from exporting plants and animal products to the UK, as in some cases they may be expected to absorb part or all of the costs.

The result? Less choice for customers and more food inflation.

The British public is going to be severely worse off when it comes to the product range in the deli counters.

As the boss of a London-based delicatess­en put it during a media interview this week, this is “an odd way of thinking from a government of a nation of shopkeeper­s”.

And let’s not forget the practicali­ties of announcing the charges with less than a month’s notice.

Affected businesses will have little time to revise their commercial arrangemen­ts with EU customers.

There has also been little in the way of clarity on how the import charges will be applied, nor reassuranc­e that businesses will receive a high level of service at control posts.

As the clock ticks to April 30, when the common user charge will come into force, we as a chamber would urge the government to reconsider their import charge plans.

Failing to do so risks higher prices for us all, at a time when we should be bearing down on business costs and food price inflation.

This is concerning for retailers, cafes and restaurant­s, who are already contending with rising costs and shrinking margins

 ?? ??
 ?? ?? The product range of delicatess­ens makes them especially vulnerable to the common user charge
The product range of delicatess­ens makes them especially vulnerable to the common user charge

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom