Caernarfon Herald

HUGE COST OF POLICE HEARING REVEALED

Force spent £57,000 and Police Federation £40,000... and it ended in written warning for sergeant:

-

THE near-£100,000 cost of a written warning to a police sergeant following a month-long disciplina­ry hearing has been described by the Police Federation as “eye-watering” and unnecessar­y.

It was also attacked by MP David Jones, who called it “a significan­t waste of public money”.

The tribunal took place in June at the Colwyn Bay headquarte­rs of North Wales Police (pictured inset).

Sgt Melvin Dawson was claimed to have been “trigger-happy” in his use of incapacita­nt spray and faced 15 allegation­s relating to the treatment of detainees at Caernarfon in 2018 and 2019.

But there was just one finding against him, of a less serious nature, for which he was given a written warning.

Freedom of Informatio­n responses reveal it cost the police force £34,600 in barrister fees, plus £929 for subsistenc­e (“providing water, tea, coffee, lunch”) and the Police Commission­er had to find £21,818 in fees of the legally qualified chairwoman and lay member, with expenses – the £57,000 total being met from public funds.

The Federation spent more than £40,000 on defending Sgt Dawson, met from its own funds.

The sergeant at the hearing described custody suites as “a dangerous environmen­t”.

Mark Jones, secretary of the Federation in North Wales, said Sgt Dawson was consistent that his use of Captor was justified, proportion­ate and necessary in each of the 15 allegation­s.

He added: “An independen­t panel examined and heard a significan­t amount of evidence and determined that, apart from one incident, all the allegation­s were unproven. The one allegation which was proved was deemed to be at the much lower level of misconduct rather than the more serious gross misconduct.

“The same outcome could have been achieved far quicker and far cheaper in an internal misconduct meeting which would have negated these eye-watering costs.”

Mark Jones said: “All these allegation­s came as a result of an investigat­ion by the Independen­t Office for Police Conduct, yet over £57,000 worth of costs came from the public purse.

“Finally, a monetary value cannot be attached to the immeasurab­le impact this whole process has had on Sgt Dawson, something that could have easily been avoided if dealt with another way.” In a statement, North Wales Police said it convened the misconduct hearing following an IOPC investigat­ion. “The proceeding­s ensured due process was followed in the public interest,” they said. “The verdict of the tribunal was made independen­tly and was based solely upon evidence. Furthermor­e the proceeding­s were heard in the public domain.”

An IOPC spokesman said: “On conclusion, in October 2020, we presented our final report to NWP, who agreed to take forward a gross misconduct hearing. It was appropriat­e the evidence was put before an independen­t panel.”

David Jones, Conservati­ve MP for Clwyd West, declared: “The IOPC has some serious questions to answer over its decision to press on with the proceeding­s. Quite apart from the needless distress and anxiety they have caused Sgt Dawson, they have also resulted in a significan­t waste of public money – more than enough to pay the cost of putting another fully trained police officer on the streets of North Wales.

“It is very clear that the complaints against Sgt Dawson could, and should, have been dealt with by an internal administra­tive procedure. Taxpayers across North Wales will be dismayed by this episode.”

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom