Understanding Engine Oil
Getting your engine oil choice right has become increasingly difficult, leading Rob Marshall to investigate how it can be done, while unpicking the latest developments.
Getting your oil choice right has become increasingly difficult. We investigate more...
Even in today’s supposed ‘ecofriendly’ world, the link between the modern motor car and the petrochemical industry remains unbroken. From most interior plastics to the fuel that still powers over 98% of cars registered on our roads, perhaps the most obvious link to fossil-fuel is the engine oil.
Planes, trains and automobiles
Whether mineral oil, intended for a fourpot classic, or a sophisticated synthetic lubricant for a modern direct-injected turbocharged triple, the ‘base stock’ originates from crude oil. Yet, while nature provides the raw material, humans deliver the development. Petroleum-based mineral oil was less prone to solidifying when cold and leaving fatty deposits behind at higher temperatures, compared to animal and vegetable oils, making it more suited to the harsh environment of an internal combustion engine. Yet, the raw product remains from perfect.
One of the notable pioneers of lubricating oil in the UK was Charles Cheers Wakefield, a publicity-conscious entrepreneur, whose business diverted from railway lubricants to supplying engine oils for motor vehicles in the early twentieth century. While supplying buses initially, the Wakefield Motor Oil company became an engine oil sponsor for more exciting competitive events to prove its engineering prowess. This successful publicity campaign began not with motorcars but monoplanes, possibly looking to cash-in on the notoriety of Louis Bleriot, a French car accessory manufacturer, who flew to England over the English Channel in under 40 minutes. By adding a small proportion of castor oil to Wakefield’s mineral lubricant, the result was a superior oil film: the Castrol brand was born. Understandably, it was not long before attention moved to motorsport. Consequently, the 1911, 1912 and 1913 Isle of Man Senior TT races were all won by motorcycles using
Castrol oils. Development accelerated during hostilities, where the rangetopping Castrol R (‘Racing’) oil provided tactical advantages for fighter planes, due to the oil being able to retain its lubricating properties at the extreme low ambient temperatures that are typical of those experienced at high altitude.
During the inter-war period, Castrol R continued to be the engine lubricant of choice for British record breakers on land, water and air. However, passenger cars were becoming more popular but they had different demands to highlystrung race winners. Additives provided the answer. In the mid-1930s, Castrol’s research department discovered that adding tin and chromium elements helped to alleviate engine corrosion, internal sludging and oil ageing, caused by oxidisation. These issues were becoming noticeable on cars undergoing short trips and remain relevant today. Enhanced engine design and better quality fuels have played essential roles since but dispersant additives keep combustion deposits suspended in the lubricant. Ultimately, this saves the car owner from having to dismantle the engine and scrape away the carbon residues, in favour of a simple and relatively inexpensive oil change.
While racing lubricants provide oil brands with a degree of credibility, they were unsuited to everyday motoring. Excessive thickening at low temperatures makes the engine very difficult to turn-over and start from cold, especially for early motorists that had to wield a starting handle first thing in the morning. If the oil was specified to be thinner at lower temperatures, the compromise was excessive thinning when hot, courting engine damage.
Additives came to the rescue, once more. While lighter oils were introduced to the British motoring public by the 1940s, defined by their viscosity (‘thickness’), polymer-based viscosity index improver additives provided a solution to the lubricant thinning-out excessively at higher temperatures. Another additive, designed to suppress the pour-point and reduce the oil’s tendency to thicken at low temperatures, inhibits the oil’s wax molecules tendency to link together as they become colder. By adjusting the viscosity improvers and pour-point suppressant additives, therefore, engine oils could adopt different viscosity characteristics at set temperatures. This important invention laid the foundations for multigrade oils and the resultant Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) classification remains in force today. The environmental role The internal combustion engine has always been extraordinarily wasteful and lubricants have become increasingly more important to reduce fuel consumption. Since the 1970s, engineers found that thinner (or less viscous) engine oils reduced resistance within the engine, wasting less energy. Engineers could use this to their advantage by improving performance, enhancing fuel consumption and reducing tailpipe emissions.
Naturally, motorsport provided an ideal testbed and BP’S introduction of a 10W-30 oil in its Formula Three racing car during the early 1970s raised eyebrows, when many motorists were used to using 20W-50 in their vehicles. The subsequent promotional material, to educate the public that engine oil choice can reduce fuel costs, started in the fuelcrisis era of the 1970s. Yet, legislation to limit carbon dioxide emissions especially has accelerated development. Five years ago, CM reported that Shell Lubricants had modified a Mitsubishi engine to run on an engine with an amazingly-low prototype 0W-12 viscosity oil, which has since become a production reality on some latest hybrids. In some instances, the oil is so thin that the engine internals are coated from new with special antifriction coatings to help tolerate potential extra metal-to-metal contact. Even so, 5W-30 is the most popular engine oil viscosity used by today’s car parc, supplanting the older 10W-40 grade.
As engines have become increasingly sophisticated, faster revving, hotter running and more powerful, mineral oil alone was no longer adequate. Synthetic oils maintain viscosity at high temperatures more effectively than mineral types, although (ironically) they are made from components that originate from crude oil. Unsurprisingly, modern chemical additive packs have also become increasingly complex. Yet, when catalytic converters became commonplace in the 1990s, which reduce toxic emissions by passing spent exhaust gases over a honeycombed structure of exotic catalysts, oil formulations changed again. As all engines burn oil to an extent, some of the anti-wear additives become deposited on the catalyst materials, rendering them ineffective. The problem was highlighted again in the 2000s, when diesel particulate filters (DPF) were blocking prematurely from anti-wear additives. This led to low sulphated ash, phosphorus and sulphur (SAPS) lubricants that must be used on engines that are equipped not only with DPFS but also Gasoline Particulate Filters (GPF).
The latest challenges
The current generation of petrol engines, especially, demands new generation oils. These small capacity, direct-injection, turbocharged units deliver impressive torque figures but require very low viscosity lubricants and extra additives to cope with the higher temperatures, increased deposits and extended service intervals. Unfortunately, certain calcium anti-wear additives, present within the oil, are responsible for igniting the fuel/air mixture within the cylinders prematurely. As the condition tends to be prevalent at low engine speed (<2,500rpm) but high-load conditions, LSPI (Low-speed Pre-ignition) is the latest challenge to overcome. Pre-ignition (‘pinking’) is just as damaging on these engines as earlier units that lacked advanced engine management that could retard the ignition automatically. Yet, because the ignition source is oil deposits on the cylinder wall, electronics cannot intervene. Violent explosions replace the intended smooth burning, the long-term consequence of which is severe mechanical harm, including damaged pistons and valves. While it is unclear whether the engine makers, or their lubrication partners, are to blame for this serious oversight, new oil standards are being introduced to help combat the challenge.
Apart from LSPI, the desire to reduce weight and carbon dioxide emissions has seen sump capacities reduce. While oil change intervals have not increased dramatically (if at all) within the last decade, many technicians and engineers concur that a biennial, or 20,000-miles, change interval is excessive. Various engine oil blenders have also revealed to CM that producing an engine oil that protects an engine throughout these extended drain periods is a significant challenge.
Identifying oil
The Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE) determines the viscosity measurement for mono and multigrade oils. Yet, the ‘weight’ scales for engine lubricant viscosities are not comparable to those used for EP (Extreme Pressure) lubricants, such as gear oils.
A lower number denotes thinner oil and an easier pour point. For multigrades, the ‘W’ denotes ‘winter’ and indicates the limit at which the oil ceases to flow properly. 0W will flow down to -30°C 5W up to -25°C
10W (-20°C)
15W (-15°C)
20W (-10°C)