CAR (UK)

THE 1978 RIVALS

- BEN MILLER

Poor Ferrari. Poor Mauro Forghieri. The 1978 F1 season was looking like an easy stroll to a couple more titles. After all, Ferrari and its genius engineer spent most of the mid-’70s winning with the very sound 312 series of cars. Niki Lauda secured the drivers’ titles in ’75 and the manufactur­ers’ crown went to Maranello for three consecutiv­e years ’75 to ’77.

Surely ’78 would be more of the same, particular­ly given the Scuderia could hardly be accused of resting on its laurels. The compact, elegant and potent T3 may have retained the 312 series’ trademark flat-12 engine (on borrowed time as aerodynami­cs prepared to take a quantum leap) but the car’s monocoque, suspension and bodywork were all new.

Then, with the 79, Lotus re-invented the wheel, and every convention­al rival – even very good ones like the 312 T3 – were, like cavalry against black powder, made obsolete. The T3 was more powerful than the 79 and a fine car; responsive to set-up work and reliable. But its underbody aerodynami­cs were rudimentar­y and its levels of downforce only incrementa­lly better than what had gone before.

But building on the 78, the 79 was a car engineered not around innovative suspension or a monster engine but around the source of its otherworld­ly speed: a couple of vast venturi tunnels along its entire underside. The narrowat-the-sump DFV V8 engine, the compromise­d rear suspension – everything else had to fit around the ground-effect aerodynami­cs that elevated the Lotus (and the sport) onto a new plane. Mario Andretti duly won the title with six wins; his team-mate Ronnie Peterson, who died after an accident in the Italian Grand Prix, was posthumous­ly awarded second place.

 ?? ?? Andretti, Chapman and Peterson with The Future/the 79
Andretti, Chapman and Peterson with The Future/the 79
 ?? ?? A great car, pitched against a revolution
A great car, pitched against a revolution

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom