Carmarthen Journal

NO ILL FEELING, SAYS DE KLERK

- MATTHEW SOUTHCOMBE Rugby writer matthew.southcombe@walesonlin­e.co.uk

SPRINGBOK scrum-half Faf de Klerk has insisted there are no hard feelings from him after an incident involving Welsh lock Jake Ball.

The pair met during Sale Sharks’ 57-14 hammering of the Scarlets in a European Champions Cup last 16 match in Llanelli last week.

In the second half of the match, Ball clattered the No. 9 at the back of a ruck. There was no on-field punishment over the incident, which saw scrum-half de Klerk flattened as he was preparing to launch a box kick with his hands placed on the ball at the back of a ruck.

The TMO and match referee Mathieu Raynal looked to see if there was an offside penalty infringeme­nt, but ruled the ball was out.

The apparent contact to de Klerk’s head by Ball’s shoulder was not discussed and the incident later attracted strong criticism.

The pair do have history, clashing during the Rugby World Cup semifinal between Wales and South Africa in 2019.

De Klerk, however, hopes there is no animosity.

“I’m all good. It’s fine. Just a bit of a rugby incident. There are no hard feelings at all,” the Springbok told The Rugby Pod.

“I don’t have any issues with him. “He might have an issue with me! “But we did have a chat after the game and I don’t think there is any animosity.

“That’s how the game goes. They obviously want to try to get their team on the go and one way of doing that is to spoil the ruck for us and stop us getting quick ball.

“It just happened. Afterwards, when I looked at it then maybe I thought it was a bit more serious than I initially thought.

“But hopefully there is no animosity and we can just get along playing again.”

South African media branded it a ‘shameful and horrendous act’ but referee Mathieu Raynal waved play-on.

He did consult with the TMO to deliberate whether or not Ball was offside, but contact to the head was not discussed.

The Scarlet also escaped a citing, meaning that the commission­er did not deem there to be sufficient evidence to suggest Ball’s actions warranted a red card.

After the incident, de

Klerk was seen remonstrat­ing with the assistant referee but he was not even sure if he had been hit in the head.

His issue was more with why Ball was allowed to tackle him while, in his view, the ball was still in the ruck. “According to me, if the referee calls ‘ball out’ then the guys can have a go at the ball but you can’t play the player,” he explained.

“So that’s what I was asking about. If the referee said the ball was out, then fine, he can have a go at the ball.

“But I’m pretty sure you can’t have a go at the player. So that was my initial thought of it.

“If I lifted the ball, then fair play, he can tackle me. That’s all I was asking.

“I wasn’t even sure about the head contact until I saw it on the replay.

“Then I thought that there may have been something more to it.

“But either way, the ref cleared and we have to play on.”

Footage of the incident was posted it on social media and widely debated, with calls for action to be taken against the bearded second row, who is leaving the Scarlets at the end of the season to return to Australia.

Citings have to be lodged within 50 hours of the game kicking off and that passed without incident.

An EPCR spokesman said: “I can confirm there has not been any citing of Jake Ball from the Scarlets-sale Sharks Heineken Champions Cup match.”

 ??  ??
 ??  ?? Jake Ball attempts to charge down a kick by Faf de Klerk in the Scarlets’ Champions Cup defeat by Sale. (Circled, left) Ball and de Klerk square up in the World Cup semi-final.
Picture: Getty Images
Jake Ball attempts to charge down a kick by Faf de Klerk in the Scarlets’ Champions Cup defeat by Sale. (Circled, left) Ball and de Klerk square up in the World Cup semi-final. Picture: Getty Images

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom