Carmarthen Journal

Tree planting barriers must be removed

- With David Waters, FUW’S Carmarthen­shire County Executive Officer

THERE is an urgent need to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, nobody is going to dispute that.

The role played by soils and plants in sequesteri­ng carbon is therefore attracting significan­t attention, with a particular focus on the planting of trees.

Here in Wales, over the past century, the area of woodland increased threefold, from 5% in 1919 to around 15% in 2016, with the vast majority of the increase down to the planting of non-native conifers.

We know that about a quarter of all woodland in Wales is on farmland and our farmers want to play their part. Yet despite the call for increased tree planting, they continue to face major obstacles, as well as a lack of supply chain opportunit­ies to provide a return.

Going forward, there has to be a focus on removing barriers to tree planting for farmers before increasing targets.

We must also ensure that tenants and common land farmers are not unfairly excluded from tree planting initiative­s due to the long-term nature of tree planting and landlord consent barriers within tenancy agreements.

However, well intentione­d policies aimed at increasing woodland areas can have the opposite intended effect. Indeed, large-scale planting by the Forestry Commission and private companies on land previously used for livestock production has devastated ecosystems and communitie­s, and led to the release of carbon from areas of peat and wetlands.

The next Welsh Government must ensure that tree planting targets and future agricultur­al support schemes are not directed at large scale monocultur­e tree plantation­s.

Any such policies should support Welsh agricultur­e, our rural communitie­s, our culture and way of life, the rural economy, biodiversi­ty, family farms and tenant farmers.

A number of recent policy proposals to increase tree-planting targets and divert agricultur­al funding towards forestry and woodland could further result in disastrous unintended consequenc­es for Wales’s family farms and the rural economy as a whole.

To put these proposals into context, the latest Committee on Climate Change (CCC) report calls for significan­t land use change in Wales, which would reduce the current agricultur­al land (not including agricultur­al woodland) by 17.5%. In our manifesto, we therefore call on the next Welsh Government to favour on-farm tree planting which can be managed and integrated alongside food production, as opposed to blanket plantation­s across swathes of the countrysid­e. The Welsh Government’s own ‘Woodland for Wales’ report recognised that most of Wales’ native woodland is on farms and is ‘small and fragmented’, therefore on-farm connectivi­ty offers more for biodiversi­ty and should be rewarded accordingl­y. The next Welsh Government needs to recognise these facts and plan accordingl­y.

On a final note, it is worth noting that offsetting carbon emissions through tree planting may represent a viable and somewhat profitable option for some farm businesses. Yet most FUW members have expressed concern in regard to the perverse outcomes for land management.

We therefore maintain that the priority should be for the agricultur­al industry to achieve net zero before selling off carbon credits to other industries. The nation’s carbon offsetting targets should not be unfairly placed on rural communitie­s and family farms.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom