Classic Car Weekly (UK)

AUSTIN & MG MAESTRO

1983 94

-

Designed as a replacemen­t for the Austin Allegro, the new front-wheel drive car – originally codenamed LC10 before later being renamed LM10 – set out to put right a lot of its predecesso­r’s wrongs. So it had a longer wheelbase for more passenger room, a hatchback for much better practicali­ty and a more convention­al mechanical layout for – Austin hoped – improved reliabilit­y and easier servicing.

The Maestro was conceived in 1975, with its styling signed o‚ at the end of that year following an internal design competitio­n between the Longbridge and Solihull design oƒces, under Harris Mann and David Bache respective­ly. It’s remarkable – considerin­g that there would be a seven-year developmen­t programme – that the styling survived the process almost unchanged.

The basic design was overseen by the brilliant Spen King (co-creator of the Range Rover and the SD1) and was a pragmatic re-make of the Volkswagen Golf MKI with a spacious and glassy interior. Unlike its predecesso­r, the suspension was by coils and that car’s transmissi­on-in-sump layout was dropped in favour of an end-on gearbox layout, just like a Golf, despite being conceived to share its A- and O-series engines.

It was looking complete and ready to go from developmen­t into production by 1978, but BL’S limited technical resources at the time persuaded the incoming new chairman and chief executive, Sir Michael Edwardes, to accelerate the LC8 – aka Austin Metro – developmen­t programme instread, putting the Maestro’s anticipate­d 1980 launch date back by up to three years. Hindsight would conclude that this was the correct decision to make, given that the Metro ended up being a huge sales success for BL and a vital lifeline for embattled dealers who had previously been struggling to shift an ageing model range that was su‚ering from a poor image.

The Austin and MG Maestro couldn’t disguise the age of their basic design when they were launched in 1983, despite the late addition of body-coloured bumpers and slimline headlights. But despite that, the cars were initially praised for their roomy interiors, excellent practicali­ty and impressive ride comfort and handling. Sold with the ‘Miracle Maestro’ tagline, it was certainly a striking new entrant to the family car market, o‚ered with a wide range of A- and R-series engines, including a throaty twin-carburetto­r option for the MG 1600.

BL worked hard to develop the Maestro throughout its life so it received the Montego’s 1.6-litre S-series engine and dashboard in 1984, followed by its 2.0-litre fuel-injected engine to create the seriously underrated MG Maestro 2.0 EFI. But the car’s poor build quality and less-than-stellar reliabilit­y would soon become apparent and buyers would forego choosing a Maestro in favour of an Escort or Astra (and, later, Rover 200), meaning that it never achieved the Allegro’s sale success – let alone that of its predecesso­r, the best-selling BMC 1100/1300 ADO16.

And that’s a shame because the Maestro had so much unrealised potential, as well as a refreshing non-conformist style, despite the niggles. Perhaps that was the story of its maker, too.

 ?? ?? The Maestro Turbo certainly looks the part, with its aggressive Tickford bodykit and ‘Turbo’ door decals lending it a bulky and brooding presence.
The Maestro Turbo certainly looks the part, with its aggressive Tickford bodykit and ‘Turbo’ door decals lending it a bulky and brooding presence.
 ?? ?? There isn’t even a boost gauge on the dash – surely that most vital of feelgood driver aids on any Eighties turbocharg­ed car?
There isn’t even a boost gauge on the dash – surely that most vital of feelgood driver aids on any Eighties turbocharg­ed car?
 ?? ?? There’s minimal turbo lag, just a constant surge of power that continuall­y surprises as you ght to correct the torque steer.
There’s minimal turbo lag, just a constant surge of power that continuall­y surprises as you ght to correct the torque steer.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom