Classic Sports Car

WHEN MERC MET MCLAREN

Mercedes’ millennial collaborat­ion with Mclaren had a difficult birth; has the passing of time cured its identity crisis?

- WORDS GREG MACLEMAN PHOTOGRAPH­Y WILL WILLIAMS

Woking brainpower meets Stuttgart muscle in the SLR coupé and Roadster

What do Fernando Alonso, Kanye West and Paris Hilton have in common, aside from being filthy rich? Not very much, with the probable exception that all three, at some point, counted a Mercedes-benz SLR Mclaren as their everyday driver; a car with the power to captivate Formula One champions, rap stars and reality television socialites, but one that over the years accumulate­d – at best – mixed reviews. Not least from its designer, whose sense of pride in the project stemmed mostly from the car’s safety credential­s. Hardly a ringing endorsemen­t for one of the most technicall­y sophistica­ted supercars of the period. So how did a car with such promise fail to set the world alight? It all began with the Vision SLR concept, which first broke cover at the 1999 Detroit motor show…

‘Tomorrow’s Silver Arrow’ served three main purposes for Mercedes. The first was to embody a new design language that could lead the firm into the new millennium, giving direction to the forthcomin­g R129 SL replacemen­t, the R230,

that arrived in 2001. The second was as a testbed for new technologi­es, and the third was to form the basis of a new Benz supercar, the SLR.

In creating the Vision SLR, Mercedes stylists unashamedl­y looked to the past, mating design cues from the original 300SLR – campaigned so successful­ly throughout the ’50s by the likes of Fangio, Moss and Kling – with some cuttingedg­e technology developed from the firm’s F1 engine programme. Externally, the Vision SLR concept’s lineage was clear to see, with its long bonnet and front overhang, straked side vents and curved rear end bringing to mind the original roadgoing 300SLR Coupé, not to mention its electrical­ly operated 75º butterfly doors. The low front spoiler with its twin ribs, meanwhile, echoed the Mclaren-mercedes Grand Prix cars that had just delivered Mika Häkkinen the 1998 F1 World Drivers’ Championsh­ip, and would do the same the following year.

The concept’s 5.4-litre V8 engine was relatively convention­al, borrowed as it was from the S-class, but beneath the sloop-like bodywork lay a number of innovation­s that would go on to appear in both the R230 SL and the SLR. The first to make the transition from concept to road car was the Vision’s trick electro-hydraulic braking, dubbed ‘Sensotroni­c Brake Control’ by the time it made full production in 2001. Using a series of microcontr­ollers, the system precisely calculated the correct braking pressure for any given situation and offered exceptiona­l stopping power thanks to fibre-reinforced ceramic discs capable of withstandi­ng extreme heat. The concept’s party piece, however, was without a doubt its chassis, which was constructe­d using fibre composites and aluminium, giving the car not only exceptiona­l torsional rigidity, but also reduced weight – by as much as 40% compared to a convention­al steel monocoque.

Gordon Murray at Mclaren Cars was charged with taking the Vision SLR concept from motor show to showroom, but while the car was undeniably a technologi­cal tour de force, he quickly realised that it made much more sense as a design study than it did a prototype. Murray’s original pitch to Mercedes had been for a rearengine­d V8 supercar, and instead he found himself tasked with building a world-beater within the constraint­s of the original Vision design; it might have looked incredible, but was obviously more grand tourer than supercar.

‘Much more binds these two iterations than separates them – it’s like looking at a pair of twins who have outgrown their phase of dressing exactly alike’

A team of just 36 created the Mclaren F1 but, with the resources and backing of such a major manufactur­er, 450 people were thrown at the SLR project. They wasted no time in addressing the concept’s most obvious flaws, shifting the front-mounted V8 back in the chassis as far as was possible – 39.4in behind the front bumper and 19.7in aft of the axle line – and lowering the position of the fuel tank. Murray had no control over the styling, but had always been a fan of active aerodynami­cs: the concept’s rounded tail was altered to be higher and flatter, increasing downforce, while an electronic­ally activated spoiler was added that rose by 10º at 59mph, increasing downforce, and by 65º under heavy braking, reminiscen­t of the air brakes used on the original SLRS. The underside of the car was also tweaked to give a flat underbody, with a purposeful, race-inspired rear diffuser. The changes contribute­d to a weight distributi­on of 49:51 front to back but, though well balanced, the SLR tipped the scales at 1768kg – a far cry from the lightweigh­t 1138kg Mclaren F1.

The Vision’s chassis was carried over to the production model. At its core was a terrifical­ly strong carbon-composite cell that surrounded its occupants, with carbon crumple zones both fore and aft – the first time this had ever been done in a series-production model. Usually hand-laid, the carbon process was modernised by Mclaren with robots knitting, sewing, weaving and braiding the complex fibre structures at a purpose-built production facility in Woking.

Like the original SLR the new super-gt used an eight-cylinder powerplant, this time Mercedes’ familiar 5439cc all-alloy V8 mated to a five-speed automatic gearbox, though in the four years from concept to production power rose by some 69bhp. Higher compressio­n and a Lysholm-type twin-screw supercharg­er took the unit up to 626bhp – 1bhp shy of the Mclaren F1, perhaps, but enough to comfortabl­y exceed the performanc­e expectatio­ns of the 1999 show car. Despite its heft, the SLR could blast to 60mph in just 3.8 secs and carry on to a dizzying top speed in excess of 200mph.

The only way to truly understand the SLR’S performanc­e is to test it away from public roads, so we arrive at the test track having driven ‘our’ black Roadster – the open version that arrived four years after the coupé original – cross-country from Historics Auctioneer­s. Guy Tedder

draws up in DD Classics’ silver tin-top, giving a chance to compare notes. It quickly becomes clear that much more binds these two iterations than separates them; it’s like looking at a pair of twins who have outgrown their phase of dressing exactly alike. Though they weren’t born at the same time, both were built at the same facility, with Roadster production beginning in 2007 as the coupé’s began to wind down.

Everything from the glass down is the same, from the frameless doors that hinge on the windscreen to the optional 19in turbine-style wheels. The only visible difference is the soft-top, which unhooks manually before folding neatly into the rear shelf at the push of a button. It’s a slick operator despite its inability to self-lock, with elbow grease apparently saving a precious 6kg.

Like its 300SL ancestor, both coupé and Roadster are impossible to enter while retaining your dignity. Paris Hilton managed it by virtue of being thinner than a spray-tanned toothpick, but for the rest of us climbing aboard remains a challenge. In the end, you’ll probably settle on throwing yourself over the high sill arse-first and hoping the rest follows – something like a hermit crab retreating into his shell. That achieved, the cabin is a pleasant place to be – if a little cramped for a car boasting such large external dimensions – and anyone who’s driven a contempora­ry SL will immediatel­y feel at home. The carbonfibr­e buckets are fairly uncompromi­sing, yet somehow manage to be comfortabl­e at the same time, and the driving position is good, with a commanding view of the SLR’S intimidati­ngly long bonnet stretching out before you like the bow of a ship. Inside, the two are almost indistingu­ishable, with the exception of the ‘Touchshift’ buttons for changing gear in the earlier car. The roadster has convention­al paddles, which prove much more intuitive when pressing on and easier to find if the wheel isn’t centred.

Hailing from a time when technology hadn’t quite kept step with designers’ ambitions, the SLR requires you to insert the ignition key before thumbing the starter, which is mounted on top of the gearlever beneath a flip-up cover. It all seems a bit gimmicky until you try it for the first time: it’s near impossible not to imagine you’re firing the cannons of a fighter jet as the 90º V8 explodes into life with a menacing rumble. The 5.4-litre mill doesn’t sound particular­ly tuneful, but there’s a definite appeal to its

thuggish beat, even at idle. The twin side-exit exhausts sited just ahead of the doors – again bringing to mind the original SLR – contribute to the sense of theatre and give this aggressive GT the swagger of a cruiserwei­ght boxer.

Having both Roadster and coupé examples together is a rare treat, and perhaps the best way to witness the full-on aural assault of the SLR. We stick to the Roadster and follow Tedder onto the circuit, easing past the coned pitlane before planting the throttle to give chase. In an instant it’s clear that the SLR Mclaren is going to be a handful, its cold tyres fishtailin­g on the damp road surface through the first bend. It feels an order of magnitude faster than the 476bhp SL55 – more than could ever be exploited on public roads – so the track gives us a good chance to test its limits in relative safety (though the trees lining either side of the road offer a gentle reminder not to push your luck). Kickdown is immense, provided you modulate the throttle slightly to keep the back end in check, and the SLR accelerate­s with unbelievab­le urgency.

It really is indecently quick, the sort of pace that raises the hairs on the back of your neck, but almost as intoxicati­ng is the drama created by the thunderous exhausts and the insistent whine of the screaming 23,000rpm supercharg­er.

Devastatin­gly fast in a straight line, the SLR feels every bit an overpowere­d hot rod, yet it also behaves itself in corners, the convention­al coil-sprung double wishbones working hard to keep the car’s bulk in check. It performs admirably, with plenty of mechanical grip and – once you come to terms with the power delivery – a composed ride. It’s only when you begin to get towards the limits that the SLR fails to inspire confidence. The steering, which was understand­ably lifeless during our low-speed slog across west London, doesn’t improve quite enough at pace, feeling somewhat dull and disconnect­ed from the road despite being heavy. The brakes, which proved a squealing frustratio­n at mundane speeds, come to life as they generate heat, but still leave you longing for slightly more reassuring pedal feel.

Convention­al logic would have you assume that the open version of almost any car will be heavier, more flexible and less focused than its closed cousin, but only one of those statements holds true for the SLR. The soft-top is heavier, but only to the tune of 57kg. In every other regard there’s little compromise thanks to the use of the same carbon tub as the coupé, which makes it one of the stiffest road cars Mercedes has ever produced. There’s practicall­y nothing to choose between the pair in terms of performanc­e, but the coupé is a more relaxed and refined place to be, the lack of buffeting encouragin­g greater speeds. Raise the Roadster’s roof and the playing field levels once again; such is its quality that it’s almost as comfortabl­e as the coupé. As a result, the convertibl­e wins the day: you essentiall­y get two cars for the price of one.

The SLR might not have been exactly what Murray intended, and contempora­ry reviews weren’t as glowing as they could have been. But time is the great healer, and with its passing what were once seen as flaws and compromise­s eventually turn into something much more valuable than impeccable handling or flawless aerodynami­cs: they become character. And that is something the SLR has in spades.

‘The starter is mounted on top of the gearlever beneath a flip-up cover, and it’s almost impossible not to imagine you’re firing the cannons of a fighter jet as the 90º V8 explodes into life with a menacing rumble’

Thanks to Historics Auctioneer­s, which is offering the Roadster by private treaty (www.historics.co.uk), and DD Classics, where the coupé is for sale (www.ddclassics.com)

 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ?? Clockwise from main: just like the ’50s 300SL, the SLR Roadster kicked off as the coupé began to wane; the big Merc corners remarkably well for a car of its size; the supercharg­ed V8 makes a thunderous 626bhp
Clockwise from main: just like the ’50s 300SL, the SLR Roadster kicked off as the coupé began to wane; the big Merc corners remarkably well for a car of its size; the supercharg­ed V8 makes a thunderous 626bhp
 ??  ??
 ??  ?? Clockwise from above: red hide adds a splash of colour, but SLR doesn’t feel as special as some supercars from within; Mclaren name added lustre, but SLR wasn’t the Woking firm’s F1 reborn; jewel-like LED tail-lights; neat rump topped by spoiler-cum-airbrake
Clockwise from above: red hide adds a splash of colour, but SLR doesn’t feel as special as some supercars from within; Mclaren name added lustre, but SLR wasn’t the Woking firm’s F1 reborn; jewel-like LED tail-lights; neat rump topped by spoiler-cum-airbrake
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ?? With the same carbon tub as the coupé, the Roadster offers a similar driving experience – albeit with an awful lot of wind in the hair. Below: superb hood tops the SLR as snugly as a tight-fitting skull cap
With the same carbon tub as the coupé, the Roadster offers a similar driving experience – albeit with an awful lot of wind in the hair. Below: superb hood tops the SLR as snugly as a tight-fitting skull cap
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom