Classic Sports Car

YEAR OF THE BULL

Or at least it looked as if it had in 1971, when the outrageous Lamborghin­i Countach landed. Five decades later, it’s lost none of that impact

- WORDS RICHARD HESELTINE PHOTOGRAPH­Y RÉMI DARGEGEN

Celebratin­g 50 years of the most savage supercar, the Lamborghin­i Countach, with LP400, LP400S, 5000S and Anniversar­y

‘During the 1970s and much of the ’80s, no other car represente­d such a visualisat­ion of childlike wonder; even now it triggers a primal response in people of a certain age’

You don’t need to have driven one to ‘get’ the Lamborghin­i Countach. It gets you, every single time. It’s only a cliché because it’s true, but the Lamborghin­i Countach really was the supercar pin-up for prepubesce­nts the world over during the 1970s. And for much of the ’80s, too, come to think of it. No other car represente­d such a visualisat­ion of childlike wonder, and even now it triggers a primal response in people of a certain age. Seeing – and hearing – four iterations together, in contrast, merely leaves you with a knot-inthe-stomach feeling.

Few cars, if any, carry such a sense of occasion. If it appears dramatic now, just imagine the reaction at the March 1971 Geneva motor show when the original LP500 prototype broke cover. Road & Track reported in period: ‘Countach is an exclamatio­n in the Turin vernacular meaning: “Oh my God!” or “Good Lord” and this certainly evokes it… Three hundred kph, or 186mph, is the potential for this dramatic car which, if it never sees the production line in this form, has features which surely will.’

But it did enter production. In doing so, Lamborghin­i metaphoric­ally raised its middle finger to Ferrari, much as it had done with the Miura barely five years earlier. Necessity being the mother of compromise, however, the Countach that emerged did so with a multitude of scoops and ducts in a bid to make it function. If anything, though, these additions served only to amplify its aura of otherworld­liness. Neverthele­ss, it was what lay beneath the startling outline that really set the Countach apart from its contempora­ries.

A multi-tubular spaceframe with an additional tubular structure carried the aluminium body while also doubling up as a rollcage. The front end was suspended by wishbones and coils, the rear employing a similar arrangemen­t but with twin coilover units per side. And then there was the engine, an all-aluminium, quad-cam V12. This Giotto Bizzarrini-conceived, Gian Paolo Dallara-refined jewel was mounted longitudin­ally rather than transverse­ly, as in the Miura, with chief engineer Paolo Stanzani placing the gearbox ahead of the engine.

This was an unusual arrangemen­t, but it ensured that the V12 was accommodat­ed within the wheelbase, along with the fuel tanks and radiators. The flywheel, the engine’s heavy bit, was nearest to the car’s centre of gravity. It was a masterwork of packaging, and the same basic template remained largely unchanged for the better part of two decades. However, by the time the LP400 (Longitudin­ale Posteriore 4 Litro) entered production in 1974, it did so without the firm’s founder, Ferruccio Lamborghin­i, and against a backdrop of significan­t industrial and political unrest in Italy.

Even so, around 150 examples were made to 1977, ‘our’ car having been delivered in October 1976. Resplenden­t in a fabulous shade of Marrone Metallizza­to (metallic brown), it remains an amazing conceit, as perfect a symbol of 1970s hedonism as was ever envisaged. What you don’t expect, and what photograph­s cannot fully convey, is the size of the LP400. In your mind’s eye, the Countach is a big car. And yet compared to most ‘small’ modern hatchbacks it appears positively dainty.

The LP400 hasn’t lost the power to shock, either. In this company it is the tamest of the lot, but what makes this car so special is its styling purity. Without the sizeable bumper overbite of later iterations, not to mention the other plastic addenda, it still looks reminiscen­t of the original Geneva show car. Bertone chief designer Marcello Gandini went for broke here, with elements of his earlier Alfa Romeo Carabo concept queen having filtered down for this applicatio­n. He simply ignored – or disobeyed – the establishe­d rules of car design, his signature sculpted rear wheelarche­s being a case in point.

And then there are the NACA ducts in each

flank. Aside from anything else, they provided a location for the door-opening buttons and also somewhere to hold when tilting them upwards. You can spend ages drinking in these details and more. That said, on entering the LP400 the mad soon takes a turn for the maddening. The tradeoff for the mechanical packaging brilliance is all too obvious: the cabin is cramped. And how. It is almost as though the engineers and designers didn’t consult each other until after they had mated the body and chassis together.

Headroom is at a premium, while the thinly padded seats offer nothing by way of rake adjustment. The close proximity of the rear bulkhead sees to that. Your posterior is located below the bottom of the pull-down door, and wedged firmly between the sill and the lofty centre console. The wheel-wells also intrude into the cabin, which means the pedals almost overlap, and the near-vertical steering wheel practicall­y rests on your lap. The thing is, once you’re in, you’re in. And, to be honest, you can forgive the LP400 anything just for the sound of its 3929cc powerhouse erupting into life.

Twist the key and the twin electric fuel pumps chatter loudly. As their ticking ebbs, a half turn and… Ber-limey! Like every facet of this car, there is nothing subtle about the Lamborghin­i staple, even if the quoted power output of 375bhp was just the teensiest bit inflated in period. There is, however, no getting around the fact that driving the LP400 – or indeed any Countach – is a chore at low speeds. The rackand-pinion steering is hard going thanks to its colossal heft. Then there’s the clutch, which has a strong and progressiv­e bite but will plait your hamstrings due to its weight. The long-travel throttle is heavy as well, but then it does have multiple carburetto­r trumpets to open.

But – and it’s an important but – get it moving and the LP400’S weightines­s slackens appreciabl­y. It’s surprising­ly tractable, with relentless accelerati­on and a linear torque spread. It pulls from low down the rev range and the sound of six twin-choke Webers sucking and gurgling is intoxicati­ng. From 2000rpm onward, the engine delivers smooth and seamless power and sounds wonderful doing so. The faster you go the better it gets, the dogleg ’box being meaty but with a clearly defined shift action. The brakes, too, are powerful even if they respond faster the second time you use them.

What the LP400 demands is your absolute attention. Get to know it well, and you will be rewarded. As for the handling, even with tyres that have a higher sidewall relative to subsequent editions, it is extremely precise. In some supercars you feel suspended between outcomes, none of them good. Here, your nerves don’t jangle. Prior experience of the model informs you that at an indicated 130mph, it remains arrowstrai­ght: there is no tramlining or front-end lift. Geared for 26mph per 1000rpm in top, it is barely getting started.

As, indeed, was Lamborghin­i, for it followed through with the wilder-still LP400S. Scroll back to 1974 and the third Countach made was delivered to a Canadian former crop-duster of Austrian extraction. But Walter Wolf wasn’t satisfied. He wanted more, to the point that he engaged Dallara to realise his vision while simultaneo­usly petitionin­g Pirelli to complete its long-awaited low-profile P7 tyre. Gandini was employed to create wheelarch extensions and a new spoiler/bumper arrangemen­t.

Displayed at the 1978 Geneva Salon in the dark-blue-and-gold livery of Wolf ’s F1 cars, and packing his special 5-litre V12 (as used in the

‘There’s no getting around the fact that driving any Countach at low speeds is a chore, but the faster you go the better it gets, and it sounds wonderful doing so’

original Countach prototype), it foretold the LP400S production car that went on sale later in the year, albeit with a slightly less radical specificat­ion. In addition to the physical makeover, beneath the skin this new strain boasted reposition­ed anti-roll bars and parallelli­nked rear suspension in a bid to maximise the potential of the then state-of-the-art tyres.

The LP400S ushered in the era of the add-ons and, to many, this was the definitive Countach outline. The 1979 car pictured here is pure walladornm­ent fantasy in tangible form, in vivid red and riding on beautiful cast-magnesium Campagnolo wheels that mimicked those employed on the Lamborghin­i Bravo show car. As for the success or otherwise of the restyle, it depends on your aesthetic sensibilit­ies. But there is no denying its ‘bring it on’ attitude.

Inside, it’s much as before with only minor ergonomic tweaks that are of no real consequenc­e. The driving stance still requires you to adopt the ‘Countach squat’ with your knees straddling the steering wheel, and ventilatio­n remains limited, as does visibility. You only really notice the difference over the previous model at speed. The LP400S feels lighter, but this is a case of perception clouding reality because it’s actually around 50kg heavier than the original’s surprising­ly slender 1300kg.

There’s the same sense of theatre on start-up, and accelerati­ve thrust, but it seems even more

boisterous. It also feels tauter still. There are no trace elements of body roll, either, but it does tend to be upset by imperfecti­ons in the road, crashing and banging over calloused asphalt. The steering, though, is a revelation. It is even better than that of the earlier car, with an immediacy that takes your breath away. The beefier wheel doesn’t writhe in your hands; it doesn’t feel edgy. The massive four-piston braking set-up is bruisingly effective.

It’s worth recalling that, by the dawn of the 1980s, Lamborghin­i appeared to be heading for the embalming table. Yet despite its zero-capital existence, it revealed the LP500S (aka 5000S) in 1982. Thanks in part to the engineerin­g nous of Maserati exile Giulio Alfieri, the Countach maintained its relevance in the supercar firmament, the V12 receiving an increase in bore and stroke for 4753cc, a lower compressio­n ratio and larger Weber 45DCOE carbs. It was finally Federalise­d for the Stateside market, too.

Finished in Bleu Acapulco, ‘our’ 1984 example is physically akin to the LP400S, the cabin architectu­re also being carried over virtually unchanged save the instrument layout within the rectangula­r binnacle. The gauges were reposition­ed for this iteration in order to make them equally difficult to read, but for different reasons. It also has air-con, which was an option but should have been mandatory because the cabin may as well be hermetical­ly sealed.

Given that this variant was taller-geared and a bit heavier than its predecesso­r, you would be hard pressed to tell the difference. It still feels

blistering­ly quick, with 0-60mph taking an alleged 4.8 secs. These days that doesn’t seem all that fast but, as before, it’s the way the Countach accelerate­s that impresses. And, unlike so many modern supercars with their flat-plane-crank parps, it sounds choral. At about 3000rpm it starts to clear its throat. Between 3500 and 5500rpm it is in full voice. In theory you can rev it to 8000rpm, but somewhere south of that you struggle to hold a conversati­on.

Like the LP400S it has massive levels of grip, the same immense stopping power and superquick steering. The only discernibl­e difference is the more evenly weighted throttle pedal, which makes for easier modulation. It is still a decidedly old-school supercar, with all that entails, but things really got interestin­g with the car that followed: the quattroval­vole. Ferrari had fought back with the Testarossa that arrived in 1984, reputedly with 390bhp. Lamborghin­i responded in double-quick time, with Alfieri conjuring a trick head with four valves per cylinder for the V12 while also raising displaceme­nt to 5167cc.

Together with a selection of other mods, this revised unit produced a genuine 455bhp at 7000rpm and an elephantin­e 369lb ft of torque at 5200rpm. Introduced at the 1985 Geneva Salon, the new strain truly delivered. However, Lamborghin­i wasn’t done: witness the 25th Anniversar­y edition. Work began on this most radical take on the theme shortly after Chrysler acquired the Sant’agata firm in June 1987, and even now it continues to polarise opinion. Neverthele­ss, it was the best-selling variant of all, with 660 finding homes from 1988-’90.

The car pictured here looks decidedly sinister in black, and there is no getting away from the fact that it is very much a product of its era. Horacio Pagani headed the team responsibl­e for the makeover and every supercar styling cliché was thrown at the Countach. Most of them stuck. The front bumper/spoiler, complete with the obligatory strakes, looks relatively tame. The cooling scoops atop the rear deck, which run all the way to the revised tail-light clusters (as previously employed on Us-spec cars), rather less so. Then there are the side skirts with yet more strakes, plus the chunky rear bumper.

The sense of whimsy continues inside. While not what you might describe as luxurious, the last-of-the-line model features wider, motorised seats so you can find a slightly less challengin­g driving stance. Oh, and for reasons we haven’t quite been able to work out, the tollbooth-only windows are electrical­ly operated. However, the 25th Anniversar­y is a riot to drive thanks in no small part to the 48-valve engine. It sounds that bit smoother than previous iterations, but it’s still far from discreet. It’s all induction roar and exhaust fanfare overlaid with a high-pitch whine from the gears. Drive one and you will swear you can hear each and every firing stroke.

Inevitably, it too suffers from a less than limousine-like ride. With no rubber insulation, you wouldn’t expect it to, but the 25th Anniversar­y feels more affected by topographi­cal nastiness than its older siblings. While suspension changes over its predecesso­r were relatively subtle, being related for the most part to the adoption of more modern Pirelli P Zero rubber, it does have a tendency to tramline. It will understeer determined­ly through low-gear bends although the steering, as with the others, is beautifull­y metered. And the brakes remain reassuring­ly strong, without threatenin­g to fade.

With the Countach, Lamborghin­i stuck to the attitude of ‘if it ain’t broke, don’t fix it’. And even if it is a bit broke, you’re probably better off not messing about with it too much. It was the right approach, even if it was thrust upon the firm by circumstan­ce. The Countach was – and remains – a toweringly capable car that outlived its natural lifespan. It was conceived in 1969 while Ferruccio Lamborghin­i was still very much in charge, withstood serial ownership and insolvency, took a turn for the brilliant under the stewardshi­p of the Mimran family and enjoyed one final hurrah under Chrysler.

It became ingrained in pop culture, too, which puts it in rarefied company. The Countach provided children of the 1970s and ’80s with the opportunit­y to while away time arguing about how to pronounce its name correctly. For that, we remain forever grateful.

As it celebrates its 50th birthday, it’s worth recognisin­g that the Countach isn’t the best supercar to turn a wheel. Not even close. It is, though, a candidate for the greatest. It is a subtle distinctio­n, but a salient one nonetheles­s.

‘Every supercar styling cliché was thrown at the 25th Anniversar­y Countach makeover. Most of them stuck’

 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ?? Clockwise from top: scissor doors became a Lambo signature; V12 was turned through 90º for the new supercar; angular cockpit; LP400 leads the bull run, chased by 5000S, LP400S and Anniversar­y
Clockwise from top: scissor doors became a Lambo signature; V12 was turned through 90º for the new supercar; angular cockpit; LP400 leads the bull run, chased by 5000S, LP400S and Anniversar­y
 ??  ??
 ??  ?? Aggressive makeover for the LP400S foretold the model’s styling direction for the 1980s, while fatter tyres brought a serious increase in grip
Aggressive makeover for the LP400S foretold the model’s styling direction for the 1980s, while fatter tyres brought a serious increase in grip
 ??  ??
 ??  ?? Bespoilere­d 5000S serves only to accentuate the purity of the LP400. Below, l-r: 4-litre V12 continued; S’s low-profile tyres broke new ground
Bespoilere­d 5000S serves only to accentuate the purity of the LP400. Below, l-r: 4-litre V12 continued; S’s low-profile tyres broke new ground
 ??  ?? High wing was de rigueur for the ’80s, but blunted top speed. Below: the architectu­re is unchanged, but the 5000S cabin feels more luxurious
High wing was de rigueur for the ’80s, but blunted top speed. Below: the architectu­re is unchanged, but the 5000S cabin feels more luxurious
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ?? Below: 25th Anniversar­y has a bulkier tail than the 5000S. Right, from top: fussier split-rim wheels for run-out model; interior has monochrome feel; revised, less elegant ducting feeds larger, 48-valve V12
Below: 25th Anniversar­y has a bulkier tail than the 5000S. Right, from top: fussier split-rim wheels for run-out model; interior has monochrome feel; revised, less elegant ducting feeds larger, 48-valve V12
 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom