Coin Collector

CROMWELL’S COMMONWEAL­TH

-

Dr Murray Andrews of the University of Worcester provides a guide to the coins used for the short-lived Commonweal­th of England, when there was no monarchy

On a cold winter’s afternoon on 30 January 1649 King Charles I was beheaded outside the Banqueting House at the Palace of Whitehall. This gruesome spectacle, watched by a packed crowd of onlookers (figure 1), came as a turning point after six harsh years of

Civil War, a conflict that saw brother fight brother in defence of King or Parliament. With Charles’ execution, Parliament had literally claimed a royalist scalp, and was able to reform the state as it saw fit. And reform it did: by the end of May 1649, the House of Commons had abolished the monarchy and House of Lords, and had declared itself the supreme authority of a new sovereign republic, the Commonweal­th of England.

In the eleven years until the restoratio­n of the monarchy in 1660, the Commonweal­th oversaw some of the most radical political transforma­tions in English history. Piece by piece, key pillars of the old English state were remodelled or dismantled in the name of the parliament­arian ‘Good Old Cause’. The coinage was no exception: long a symbol of royal power, it too was transforme­d under the Commonweal­th, and the many thousands of coins kept in museums and private collection­s offer glimpses into the history of this remarkable ‘English revolution’.

All change at the Mint

Control of the coinage was a priority of the Commonweal­th regime in early 1649. During the Civil War, Parliament held on to the Mint at the Tower of London, but made the unusual decision to continue striking coins bearing traditiona­l royal designs. Shillings struck at the Tower in 1645, for example (figure 2), bore a portrait bust of Charles I, circumscri­bed by the Latin legend CAROLVS D G MAG BRI FRA ET HIB REX, ‘Charles, by the grace of God, King of Great Britain, France, and Ireland’. The reverses, meanwhile, depicted a quartered shield bearing the royal arms, surrounded by the Latin legend CHRISTO AVSPICE REGNO, ‘I reign with Christ as my protector’. The maintenanc­e of a

Dr Murray Andrews of the University of Worcester provides a guide to the coins used during the short-lived Commonweal­th of England, when the nation existed without a monarchy following the Second English Civil War and the trial and execution of Charles I

royal coinage during this period could be viewed as a pragmatic compromise, a canny decision made before the outcome of the war had been decided. But it also reflected a deliberate political strategy adopted by parliament­arian loyalists. Throughout the 1640s, many presented their cause as a fight ‘for King and Parliament’, casting the King as the unwilling pup-pet of ‘evil councillor­s’.

Whatever their basis, by 1649 these arrangemen­ts no longer matched political reality: the new republican government demanded a coinage of its own. On 13 February, barely a fortnight after Charles’ execution, Parliament establishe­d a committee to reassess the Mint’s activities. Its tasks were twofold: on the one hand, it would consider the regulation of the Mint, while on the other it would prepare dies for a new Commonweal­th coinage. In this spirit, the committee spent the summer of 1649 examining Mint staff, dispensing of those who held any royalist sentiments. Some ‘old hands’ found themselves out of a job; among their number were the clerk of the irons, Thomas Swallow, the engraver Edward Wade, and the weigher Hamond Franklin.

Men granted offices at the Mint by patents from Charles I – for example, the comptrolle­r Henry Cogan, and the assay masters Andrew Palmer and Thomas Woodward – were dispossess­ed in a similar fashion. The vacant posts were filled by new men, many of whom had backed Parliament during the war. The office of master-worker, for example, went to Aaron Guerdain, a doctor from Jersey who had advocated for Parliament during the 1640s. Other posts went to military men. The new comptrolle­r, Thomas Barnardson, had supplied Parliament’s New Model Army with a regiment of foot soldiers during the siege of Colchester in 1648; the new teller and weigher, Henry Dumaresq, had commanded Jersey’s parliament­arian militia during the 1640s.

The coins of the Commonweal­th

In the autumn of 1649 Parliament ordered the Mint to issue new coins in the name of the Commonweal­th. The coinage was bimetallic, and comprised a range of denominati­ons in high-value gold (the unite, double-crown, and crown) as well as mid to low-value silver (the crown, halfcrown, shilling, sixpence, halfgroat, penny, and halfpenny). The designs of these coins differed radically from their royal predecesso­rs (figures 3-4). On the obverse, the royal bust was replaced by a shield emblazoned with the Cross of St George, sat within a wreath formed of a palm and olive branch. The reverses, meanwhile, depicted paired shields emblazoned with the Cross of St George and the Harp of Ireland. These changes of design were profoundly symbolic: England had rejected a royal coinage in favour of a national coinage, which would circulate in all those areas under English control.

But change was not limited to imagery. Latin legends were replaced by English legends: on the obverse, THE

COMMONWEAL­TH OF ENGLAND, and on the reverse GOD WITH VS. This was a calculated move designed to appeal to the Commonweal­th’s protestant backers. For many English protestant­s, particular­ly dissenters like the Levellers, Puritans, and Quakers, the official use of Latin was an unwelcome relic of ‘superstiti­ous Popery’. Its replacemen­t by a Godly message in plain English therefore symbolised the rejection of Catholicis­m, and a commitment to a ‘correct’ protestant outlook.

Despite embarking on a new coinage in its own name, there is no evidence that the Commonweal­th ever attempted to withdraw earlier royal coins from circulatio­n. This had the peculiar effect of producing a currency pool in which Commonweal­th coins circulated side-by-side with those of its deposed or deceased royalist predecesso­rs. The complex monetary situation that arose is illustrate­d by a hoard of nearly 1,600 silver coins buried near Blackfriar­s Bridge, London, in c.1660 and rediscover­ed in the mid-1990s. Less than a quarter of the coins in this hoard were Commonweal­th issues, the remainder consisting of earlier royalist coins, chiefly of Charles I.

Complexiti­es aside, archaeolog­ical and metal-detector finds suggest that Commonweal­th coins enjoyed a widespread circulatio­n in English towns and villages during the mid-17th century. This situation could hardly please the Commonweal­th’s royalist opponents, who denounced the coins as inferior products of an illegitima­te regime. Ridicule was a key weapon in the royalist arsenal. One quick-witted critic, the royalist Lord Lucas, observed that the conjoined shields on the reverse of Commonweal­th coins resembled a pair of breeches: ‘a fit stamp for the coin of the Rump’. Counterfei­ting, however, posed a more serious threat to the coinage than any royalist jibes, and on 17 July 1649 Parliament passed an Act making the counterfei­ting and clipping of coins a capital offence. These measures clearly had mixed success, for many examples of counterfei­t Commonweal­th coins have been uncovered in recent years (figure 5).

The coinage of the Protectora­te

Throughout its existence the Commonweal­th was riven by factional disputes, but none were quite as significan­t as those that arose in the early 1650s between Parliament and the New Model Army. Slow progress on constituti­onal reforms frustrated Army Grandees, including the decorated Lieutenant-General Oliver Cromwell (figure 6). Tensions between the parties came to a head in April 1653, when Parliament refused Cromwell’s demands to form a caretaker government of MPs and army representa­tives. Cromwell subsequent­ly marched his troops into the House of Commons, and forcibly dissolved Parliament. In July 1653 a new ‘Parliament of Saints’ was summoned, but this was equally incapable of resolving constituti­onal problems, and was itself dissolved on 8 December. One week later, the army’s Council of Officers unilateral­ly adopted a new constituti­on for the Commonweal­th. Known as the Instrument of Government, this constituti­on vested key executive powers in a single head of state: the Lord Protector, Oliver Cromwell.

Cromwell’s rule as Lord Protector transforme­d the Commonweal­th from a dysfunctio­nal parliament­ary

Commonweal­th coins enjoyed a widespread circulatio­n, a situation that didn't please royalist opponents, who denounced the coins as inferior

republic into a military dictatorsh­ip, ruled by a king in all but name. The scale of the political reversal was made clear in November 1656, when the Mint’s chief engraver, Thomas Simon, was instructed to prepare dies for gold and silver coins in Cromwell’s name. The designs of these coins echoed their royalist predecesso­rs (figure 7), depicting a laureate Cromwell on the obverse and a crowned quartered shield on the reverse. The legends, meanwhile, reverted from English to Latin: they now named OLIVAR D G R P ANG SCO ET HIB &c PRO, ‘Oliver, by the grace of God, Protector of the Republic of England, Scotland, Ireland, etc’, and proclaimed PAX QVAER-ITVR BELLO, ‘Peace through War’. The earliest of these coins, dated 1656, were struck at Drury House in 1657, using an innovative minting machine designed by the French moneyer Pierre Blondeau. Production ceased after Cromwell’s death at Whitehall on 3 September 1658, and few if any of the coins seem to have entered circulatio­n. Authentic specimens are now desirable collectors’ pieces, and command extraordin­ary prices at auction.

The end of the Commonweal­th coinage

On 3 September 1658 the title of Lord Protector passed to Oliver Cromwell’s eldest son, Richard. The succession was a poisoned chalice. Unlike his father, Richard Cromwell lacked military experience and supporters. Moreover, he inherited a state blighted by financial problems: by the time of his accession, the Commonweal­th was in the throes of economic depression, and was saddled by debts worth £2.5m. Richard’s attempts to resolve these problems drew the ire of Parliament and Army alike, and by May 1659 he had been effectivel­y ousted from power in a bloodless coup.

Political disputes thundered on in Richard’s wake, and in February 1660 a powerful military faction, headed by General George Monck, marched on London demanding a new political settlement. Monck and his followers believed that stability was only achievable under a restored monarchy, and to these ends worked with a strong royalist contingent in the new ‘Convention Parliament’ to secure the return of the exiled Charles

II. On 4 April 1660 Charles II issued his Declaratio­n of Breda, pledging to pardon all those who accepted his claim to the English throne. Parliament agreed to these terms, and by 29 May the King had returned to London, ready to receive his crown.

The restoratio­n of Charles II in 1660 signalled the end of the Commonweal­th era, and sealed the fate of its coinage. On 7 September 1661, Charles II issued a proclamati­on withdrawin­g all Commonweal­th coins from circulatio­n, a policy enforced with great rigour: in many cases, holes were punched through the old coins in an act of forcible demonetisa­tion (figure 8). Those specimens that escaped the melting pot are a material legacy of a revolution­ary England, a ‘world turned upside down’.

 ??  ??
 ??  ?? Above left: a 1652 allegory on Oliver Cromwell by Crispijn van de Passe. Cromwell is shown as a tyrant, oppressing the French, Dutch, Irish and Scots. He is mocked for his love of money; he is being crowned by a mythologic­al winged beast (a griffon), which convenient­ly produces gold coins from its backside (Rijksmuseu­m, www.rijksmuseu­m.nl)
Above right: a portrait of Oliver Cromwell, anonymous, c.1650
Above left: a 1652 allegory on Oliver Cromwell by Crispijn van de Passe. Cromwell is shown as a tyrant, oppressing the French, Dutch, Irish and Scots. He is mocked for his love of money; he is being crowned by a mythologic­al winged beast (a griffon), which convenient­ly produces gold coins from its backside (Rijksmuseu­m, www.rijksmuseu­m.nl) Above right: a portrait of Oliver Cromwell, anonymous, c.1650
 ??  ?? 1
1
 ??  ?? 3
3
 ??  ??
 ??  ?? 2
2
 ??  ?? 4
5
4 5
 ??  ?? 6
6
 ??  ??
 ??  ?? 7
7
 ??  ?? 8
8
 ??  ??
 ??  ?? Image credits:
Figure 1: Public domain; figure 2: © PAS/York Museums Trust, CC BY 2.0; figure 3: © PAS/Kent County Council, CC BY 2.0; figure 4: © PAS/Kent County Council, CC BY 2.0; figure 5 © PAS/ Northampto­nshire County Council, CC BY-SA 4.0; figure 6: Public domain; figure 7: Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0; figure 8: © PAS/Salisbury and South Wiltshire Museum, CC BY 2.0 licence
Image credits: Figure 1: Public domain; figure 2: © PAS/York Museums Trust, CC BY 2.0; figure 3: © PAS/Kent County Council, CC BY 2.0; figure 4: © PAS/Kent County Council, CC BY 2.0; figure 5 © PAS/ Northampto­nshire County Council, CC BY-SA 4.0; figure 6: Public domain; figure 7: Cleveland Museum of Art, CC0 1.0; figure 8: © PAS/Salisbury and South Wiltshire Museum, CC BY 2.0 licence

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom