Computer Active (UK)

A phone that makes all the wrong calls

Terrible performanc­e and features all rolled into 1

-

Screen and cameras are poor, while the battery won’t let you use either for very long anyway

In a world where iphones cost a grand and have names you can’t pronounce, it’s refreshing to see a smartphone for 70 quid that’s just called ‘1’. Then again, Alcatel is French (though now part of Nokia), so is it ‘one’ or ‘un’? Let’s just admit that it doesn’t really matter, because you’re not going to be asking for one. Or un.

The 1 has a tall 18:9 screen, like all this year’s top phones. That’s where the similariti­es end. This screen format started with the iphone X, which kept the overall shape of a convention­al phone but stretched the screen all the way to the edges, eliminatin­g the empty areas above and below.

However, Alcatel’s screen doesn’t go all the way to the edge – there are still sizeable borders at the top and bottom, and a fair bit of space at the sides, too. That would make the whole thing unusually large, except that it isn’t: it’s a compact model, comparable to an iphone SE. So in fact the screen is unusually small.

That’s really just as well, because it’s made up of just 960x480 pixels, which isn’t sharp even at this size. To dispel any remaining hopes, it’s dim, with narrow viewing angles, picks up fingerprin­ts quickly, and covers just 71 per cent of the SRGB colour range, inaccurate­ly. Set into the area above it is a sub-standard selfie camera, which, like the rubbish main camera on the back, uses software fakery to inflate its low megapixel count (just 2 and 5 megapixels respective­ly). The only positive feature of the silver, black or blue plastic case is that it pops off so you can swap the battery, which ran out after playing our test video for just 6 hours 30 minutes.

Although the 1 has an adequately fast processor, it runs Android Go, a limited version designed to cope with slow processors. And despite that, it still felt slow. We’re confused. Actually, we’re not: this is just a terrible phone. Motorola’s £119 Moto E5 (see our review, Issue 538) is so much better in every way that it’s well worth the extra £49.

SPECIFICAT­IONS

5in 960x480-pixel screen • 5-megapixel rear camera • 8-megapixel front camera • 8GB flash storage • Microsd card slot • 802.11n Wi-fi • Bluetooth 4.2 • 3G/4G • 138x66x9.8mm (HXWXD) • 145g • One-year warranty www.snipca.com/29381

VERDICT You could say this phone has a certain ‘je ne sais quoi’, because we don’t know what would make anyone buy it ★ ★★★★ ALTERNATIV­E Motorola Moto E5 £119 19 Yes, it costs more, but this is a far better 18:9 phone with a battery that lasted nearly 20 hours

 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom