Cycling Weekly

Doctor Hutch

The Doc muses on the chaos and carnage of that pre-season rite of passage, the (un)reliabilit­y trial

- Doctorhutc­h_cycling@timeinc.com

It is reliabilit­y trial season. If you’re unclear on what a reliabilit­y trial is, you are not alone. I’ve done at least a dozen over the years, and I’m still hazy on the matter.

I know they’re supposed to be a chance to demonstrat­e your reliabilit­y. There is meant to be some stuff about checkpoint­s and target average speeds. But most of the ones I’ve ever done were just a burn-up — an unlicensed race with no marshals, no commissair­es and, practicall­y speaking, no rules.

They’re not all like that. Some are worse. Some are there to simply make you unhappy through whatever means necessary. It’s the “trial” bit you need to worry about, not the “reliabilit­y” bit.

My friend Bernard was once permitted to organise a reliabilit­y trial. I don’t know why we allowed this — I think the irony of him being the world’s least reliable man appealed to us. It started well — two riders crashed after 200 yards. But only one of them broke a collarbone and had to abandon the ride. He was the lucky one.

After a few miles, we arrived at a closed road. Bernard looked not at all surprised — perhaps because it was on his regular commute. “Oh my goodness,” he said. “What shall we do now?”

He looked about in mock bafflement. Then he said, “Down there – a shortcut.” He pointed at a muddy bridle path, steeply downhill. One or two of us reluctantl­y started to tiptoe down it on foot, slipping and sliding.

“Are you cyclists or pedestrian­s?” cried Bernard, setting off down the path on his bike.

“Pedestrian­s, please, let us be pedestrian­s,” I muttered.

One of Bernard’s talents is riding road bikes over the most unsuitable terrain. It’s a combinatio­n of his perpetuall­y half-inflated tyres and a centre of gravity that would embarrass a Weeble. He slithered off down the path, skidding into ruts, never quite in control, but never falling over either.

But the rest of us fell over. All of us. The lucky landed in soft mud. The unlucky on rocks. Several abandoned the ride to limp home. One of us landed on a nice soft dog turd then, attempting to wash it off in the stream at the bottom of the hill, managed to fall in complete with bike. He rang his wife and demanded rescue. As many as could fit in a car waited with him, but I wasn’t quick enough.

Bernard had lured us into his web of mud. His pace was relentless. “Come on,” he shouted, in exactly the manner he hates when others shout it at him.

As the path dropped along a gully, we met a convoy of 4x4s coming the other way, driven by men in no mood to share. We had to scramble out of the way, up the banks and into the nettles.

Finally, we emerged onto a road. Those that were left looked like the survivors of a natural disaster, all except Bernard. “Tramps!” shouted a middle-aged woman in the next village, while her teenage daughter threw lumps of mud at us, as if mud held any more fears. “Good morning to you too,

“Bernard had lured us into his web of mud. His pace was relentless”

madam,” Bernard replied.

When I got home, mud fell off my kit as I got undressed, splatterin­g over most of the bathroom. The remaining mud clogged the washing machine, which flooded the kitchen, lifting all the floor tiles I’d stuck down with the wrong adhesive, and ruining the new hall carpet.

Mrs. Doc arrived in the midst of the clear up operation.

“Bernard’s reliabilit­y trial went a bit feral,” I said.

“You went on a ride organised by Bernard? Are you sick in the head, or something?” said Mrs. Doc.

“I suppose I wanted to show how reliable I was,” I said.

Mrs. Doc assessed the devastatio­n. “Mission accomplish­ed,”she said.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??
 ??  ?? If anything, Bernard proved to be reliably unreliable
If anything, Bernard proved to be reliably unreliable

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom