Cyclist

Vitus ZX-1 EVO

Vitus’s 30-year-old model gets a facelift

- Words SAM CHALLIS

Vitus is a near-100-year-old company with a storied past. It has changed names and ownership, nationalit­ies and business models and has even been brought back from the dead. However, throughout all of these ebbs and flows the brand has consistent­ly produced well-regarded bicycles and can boast a number of formative innovation­s. But for me one bike stands out as a particular­ly important design: the ZX-1.

Released in the early 1990s it was one of the very first carbon fibre frames to be produced using the monocoque (made in one piece) constructi­on method. It had internal cable routing and an aerodynami­c form (finished off nicely by the ray-like Corima Manta bars) that still looks radical today. It ostensibly laid the foundation­s for modern aero bike design and fabricatio­n.

This year Vitus has released a new version of the ZX-1. It takes over the reins from the last iteration launched in 2018 and according to Vitus is anything up to 45% more efficient depending on yaw angle at 45kmh.

The project, says Vitus, started ‘with a blank piece of paper’. In the cliché stakes this is up there with ‘redevelope­d from the ground up’ or ‘going back to the drawing board’, but I couldn’t help thinking that here it was justified. There has been no simple tweaking of tube profiles or merely a change of logo typeface. The new bike is unrecognis­able. Or rather, it is compared to the previous generation.

Its seat tube bears more than a passing resemblanc­e to that first ZX-1 from 1992, which suggests a certain amount of validation for the aerodynami­c efficiency of both designs: drag hasn’t changed, so why should the shapes that cheat it? But I digress. The new ZX-1 has received quite the overhaul in design, although its monocoque constructi­on method and Vitus’s focus on keen pricing remain.

Wind-cheating changes

Across the frameset, round tubes have been stretched and snipped to become truncated aerofoils. The seatstays have dropped down low on the seat tube to tuck them out of the wind, with the top tube becoming horizontal for the same reason. The front end has had a tidy-up too – it is all clean angles and smoothly integrated componentr­y.

Vitus has FSA to thank for some of that. The Italian component specialist has devised a neat

ACR headset/cockpit routing system that bike brands can make use of. I think it’s a superb option for budget-conscious brands, who get all the aesthetic and performanc­e benefits of FSA’S finishing kit and entirely hidden cables without having to go to the costly lengths of developing and producing proprietar­y components.

It does impose some limitation­s, though.

The frame has to house a 1.5in upper headset bearing, which means the frontal profile of the head tube may be wider than it would otherwise ideally be from an aerodynami­cs standpoint, although Vitus has cannily waisted the head tube below the upper bearing to minimise any impact. I can’t say it did anything to harm the feeling of efficiency I got from the bike – it seemed to hold on to speed as well as any aero bike in the market – but it perhaps contribute­d to the pretty clear feedback I got from the road.

The solid forks, beefy head tube and huge Vision (FSA’S aero-focussed sub-brand) Metron

Vitus had made pragmatic compromise­s that help ensure this latest incarnatio­n honours the legacy of the ZX-1 name

5D cockpit did little to filter rough road surfaces, although considerin­g the bike’s racy remit this directness is hardly a deal-breaker.

Altered angles

The ZX-1’S geometry has undergone a similar level of revision to the tube shapes. The handling has been kept fast, but in general, things from the bottom bracket forward have been lengthened and lowered, creating a 1,012mm wheelbase. As the chainstays have been brought in to a short 410mm, that means the bike has a notably long front-centre (the dimension from bottom bracket to front wheel axle).

I found that at lower speed, for example when climbing, this created a palpable sense of the front turning and the rear catching up. Bikes with shorter front-centres relative to overall wheelbases tend to manoeuvre in a more cohesive fashion in this situation, but I raise that as a quirk rather than a negative, for it paid back with interest when I was going downhill. The bike imparted a distinct sense of stability and confidence when descending.

Just as with the FSA ACR front end, it’s an example of Vitus making another pragmatic compromise that helps ensure this latest incarnatio­n honours the legacy of the ZX-1 name. It’s perhaps half a kilo heavier than the lighter bikes in the genre, but for around half their price the ZX-1’S performanc­e makes the necessity of dropping that weight hard to justify.

 ?? ??
 ?? ??
 ?? ??
 ?? ??
 ?? ??
 ?? ??
 ?? ?? The ZX-1 EVO features short chainstays while the front end has been lengthened, which affects handling slightly at low speed but pays dividends by increasing stability when you’re descending at full pelt
The ZX-1 EVO features short chainstays while the front end has been lengthened, which affects handling slightly at low speed but pays dividends by increasing stability when you’re descending at full pelt

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom