Daily Mail

A letter that should never have arrived

-

IN SEPTEMBER, Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS) wrote to my husband saying that following a review of NatWest Life’s selling procedures, it was offering a £2,832.56 ex-gratia payment in respect of a High Income Bond. Unfortunat­ely, my husband had died ten months earlier and his bank, NatWest (part of RBS), was notified of his death. When I told RBS this, they asked for the probate and death certificat­e. I was then told that because the payment was ex-gratia and was not an admission of liability for misselling, it was, therefore, personal only to the policyhold­er. They have not even returned the death certificat­e. I AM not at all clear about the distinctio­n that RBS is making between a liability and a nonliabili­ty which, nonetheles­s, warrants a payout. RBS says: ‘ It is possible that the policyhold­er may have assumed, incorrectl­y, that there would have been a greater benefit — and that it was in that capacity that we felt an offer was appropriat­e.’

And if such a payment were appropriat­e for a living policyhold­er, why is it inappropri­ate to make the payment into the estate of a dead policyhold­er?

What I am clear about is that RBS was at fault in sending out this letter months after you had notified your bank of your husband’s death. In the circumstan­ces, RBS has done the decent thing.

It has reconsider­ed its decision and will pay you the ex- gratia payment — nearly £ 2,900 — in respect of your late husband’s bond purchase. LAST October, I paid £220.25 for Rod Stewart concert tickets, using my NatWest Mastercard. Unfortunat­ely, the concert was postponed and we couldn’t go on the reschedule­d date. Meanwhile I had closed the creditcard account I had used to buy the tickets so did not receive my refund. Ticketmast­er is adamant that they can only make a refund to the card used for the bookings.

P. W., Leicester. THIS chain of events is an unfortunat­e mix-up rather than anything sinister.

But it does reveal the difficulti­es when staff are not empowered to tackle unusual cases.

I am glad to say that the company is putting into place some new procedures to ensure this doesn’t happen again.

Following my request, Ticketmast­er has confirmed that a refund of £ 220.25, payable by cheque, is being organised and it will also be sending you a £ 25 Ticketmast­er gift voucher by way of apology for the delay in returning your money.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom