MPs ‘should be paid four times as much as average worker’
Watchdog’s reform could see wages rise to £92,000
MPS could see their pay soar by 40 per cent to almost £ 92,000 under proposals floated by the parliamentary watchdog.
The idea, coming after the Westminster expenses scandal and in the midst of pay freezes across much of the country, immediately ran into a hail of criticism.
Among many proposals for a shake-up of MPs’ pay and pensions, the Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority suggested MPs could earn four times the national average wage. That would see their pay increase from the £65,738 to £91,936.
It also suggests MPs should give up their gold-plated final salary pensions and contribute far more to their retirement pots.
IPSA chairman Sir Ian Kennedy said that in return for the pensions cut, MPs could receive higher pay. A consultation document, unveiled by the watchsions.’ dog yesterday, suggested this could be done by linking pay to national earnings – with future rises pegged to an external factor, such as inflation or economic growth. Although the watchdog floated the idea of salaries at four times the average wage, a multiple of three is more likely, which would see salaries rise 5 per cent to £68,952.
Other suggestions include MPs being paid in proportion to the number of hours they work in the Commons and their constituency, or receiving a performance-related salary. But Labour MP John Mann said there was ‘no case whatsoever’ for MPs getting a pay increase when public sector workers had their wages frozen.
He added: ‘Frankly, this IPSA organisation has lost its marbles by suggesting different pay rates for different kinds of MP and big pay increases. It’s a load of nonsense.’
And Matthew Sinclair, of the TaxPayers’ Alliance, said: ‘Most taxpayers earn much less than MPs and don’t get gold-plated pensions.
‘They won’t be impressed by the idea that politicians need even higher pay to compensate them for more realistic pen-
‘Very little public appetite for this’
A spokesman for IPSA said: ‘These are ideas that have been put to us by the public, and we are consulting on them. Is four times the national average earnings the right number?
‘Or should it be three, two, five, one? We want to see what people think about this.’ IPSA’s consultation document suggests MPs, who have had a pay freeze for the past three years, should have a small 1 per cent rise over the next two years – in line with the public sector.
But it also says that, in future, a new way of calculating salaries should be set up, by pegging pay to some external indicators.
An MP’s current pay of £65,738 is equivalent to between 2.5 and 2.9 times the level of annual average earnings, depending on the choice of index.
However, the document said research commissioned by IPSA found there is ‘very little appetite’ among the public for increases in MPs’ pay, and most people think the current level of £65,736 is ‘broadly fair’.
IPSA also pointed out that MPs are paid less than their counterparts in other countries. Four countries pay their MPs more than £100,000 a year – Italy, the US, Australia and Japan.
The average across the countries surveyed was £86,237 – 31 per cent higher than the salary given to Westminster MPs.
Comment – Page 14