Daily Mail

Are our GPs being worked too hard?

-

OUR daughter, a GP all her working life and a partner in a challengin­g inner-city practice, has become very disillusio­ned with the unrealisti­c demands made on her. A typical morning surgery consists of a first appointmen­t at 7.15am, 94 telephone consultati­ons after surgery finishes, home visits, ‘lunch’ from 4.10 to 4.20pm, a full evening surgery, then emails and paperwork. She gets home at 8.30pm. She also attends practice meetings and training sessions. She is totally demoralise­d and says becoming a GP was the biggest mistake of her life. It beggars belief the Government wants to force seven-day surgeries on GPs. Please don’t complain to your GP when there are no appointmen­ts, it simply isn’t their fault.

Names and address supplied.

Talk of the NHS losing millions because people miss GP appointmen­ts is rubbish. My GP’s surgery is normally packed with people waiting for their appointed time. Invariably, people wait 15 to 20 minutes past that time. If a patient doesn’t turn up, the doctor immediatel­y sees the next patient and there are always people who turn up on the off-chance the doctor can see them. Fining people for missing an appointmen­ts would be impossible to implement.

FREDERICK LEES, Walsall, West Mids.

NOW retired, I worked as a GP for 40 years, and yet again we are hearing about the appalling waiting times for GP appointmen­ts. Throwing more money at any aspect of the NHS has minimal impact and training more GPs is obviously more of a long-term strategy. In my later years I was often asked to go on this or that committee: they were a waste of time and rarely made decisions which affected patient care. Some are necessary and productive but many are not. Getting rid of some would free-up thousands of GPs to spend more time doing surgeries.

Dr R. N. SNOOK, West Kirby, Wirral.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom