Daily Mail

BREXIT BLOOD LETTING!

We knew the referendum battle was vicious. But a startlingl­y candid diary by the pugnacious tycoon who helped bankroll Leave reveals it was FAR more toxic than anyone thought ... and his worst venom is aimed at his OWN SIDE

-

JUST when you thought there was nothing new to say about how the EU referendum was won and lost, along come the rumbustiou­s diaries of belligeren­t multimilli­onaire businessma­n Arron Banks — one of the chief architects of the Brexit campaign. TONY RENNELL leafs through their pages, overflowin­g with venom and farce, to uncover the often hilarious truth about what went on behind the scenes of the Leave movement . . .

OUTSIDE the world of Westminste­r and big business, few people will have heard of Arron Banks, but his influence on the outcome of June’s in-out vote could not have been more crucial. A roguish, larger -than-life multi-millionair­e based in Bristol, he came swashbuckl­ing into the Brexit campaign in July last year at the request of beleaguere­d Ukip leader Nigel Farage. Banks seized the opportunit­y with relish. A fervent believer in the benefits to Britain of leaving the EU, he made it clear he was prepared to put his money where his mouth was. He would pitch in several million pounds — small beer for a tycoon said to be worth well over £100 million.

He’d made that wealth from the insurance business, beginning as a junior underwrite­r at Lloyd’s before branching out on his own. Starting with just a desk and two phones, he went on to make a fortune.

These days he also owns a bank in the Isle of Man as well as several diamond mines in South Africa.

Banks, 50, has nothing but con - tempt for politician­s as a breed, and believes most of the popula - tion feel the same.

Instinctiv­ely confrontat­ional, the sort of troublemak­er who can’t see a lawn without gleefully parking his tanks on it, during the referendum battle, he fell out with virtually everyone, from the space agency Nasa (who po-facedly accused him of using a quote from astronaut Tim Peake out of context) to Victoria Beckham. He didn’t care.

It goes without saying that those in the Remain campaign were appalled by him. T o them, he was the devil incarnate, denounced as a racist and a bigot.

But influentia­l political figures in the Leave camp also virulently opposed to him, even though they were ostensibly on the same side as him and wanting the same result.

Get back in your box and leave it to the profession­als, was their snooty message when he came on the scene. ‘Get lost’ was the polite version of his response.

‘These guys are political to the core and don ’t give a flying f*** about anyone who doesn’t hang out at the Cinnamon Club, that fancy curry house in W estminster. We should not let them drag us down.’

In his eyes, he had two great virtues that they lacked. The first was a clear - sighted instinct for what mattered to real people, rather than to the politician­s they had come to distrust after years of being ignored on what they, and he, saw as the key issue — controllin­g immigratio­n.

THE second was that he was not afraid to tell it as it was. No holding back or pussy-footing. That is abundantly clear in his rollicking , raucous and irreverent diaries. They show that the referendum campaign was at times so chaotic and farcical as to make a Carry On film look seriously grown up.

His attacks on politician­s in the Leave campaign are so wickedly scathing you can’t help but laugh. He dismisses Nigel Lawson, former Chancellor under Thatcher and regarded by many as Leave’s intellectu­al heavyweigh­t — as ‘a wax - work from a dusty crypt — where did they dig him up?’

Chris Grayling, the then Leader of the House, now T ransport Secre - tary, is the ‘greyest of the grey’ who sends Banks into ‘a mini coma ’. William Hague is a ‘flop’ as Foreign Secretary, and as for Boris John - son, Banks is contemptuo­usly dismissive: ‘Not a real Brexiteer . This is an In- or- Out situation; Shake-It-All-About isn ’t on the ballot paper.’

Banks pulls no punches and offers no olive branches. everyone gets a good kicking as his diaries lay bare the bitter infighting among the Leave camp.

Mainstream Leavers were hellbent on downplayin­g two issues — immigratio­n and Farage. They saw both as divisive and wanted them air-brushed out of the campaign. But to Banks, they were sure -fire vote-winners.

And so began a bitter battle for the heart and soul of the Brexit campaign, in which he deployed what he freely confessed to be ‘mischief, mayhem and guerrilla warfare’ at every turn to achieve victory for what he believed was right for the people of Britain.

He was deliberate­ly ‘ blunt, edgy and controvers­ial’ in making his case. He planned Brexit The Movie, a Brexit rock concert and stunts galore — anything to create a stir . His team took every opportunit­y to send out mischievou­s tweets winding up the opposition.

But he was also well- organised and business -like in signing up support for his organisati­on, Leave.eU, through new media such as Facebook and Twitter as well as Press and TV. He set up call-centres to poll and persuade, being practical, not just posturing.

Meanwhile, he was fending off enemies from within the Leave campaign, beginning notably with Douglas Carswell, the only remaining Ukip MP after the 2015 general election, who had defected from the Tories and was for ever having nasty spats with Farage.

Banks believed Carswell was not a genuine ‘Kipper’ but essentiall­y a Tory plant keeping tabs on what Ukip was up to and trying to deflect it from creating too much mischief.

He claims Carswell defected to Ukip only after the promise of ‘a hefty sum of money’ from Ukip as compensati­on (with a guarantee also that his family would be ‘looked after’) if, in the ensuing by-election he lost the Clacton seat which he’d held for many years as a Tory.

CARSWELL, in the event, won in Ukip colours, but, Banks added: ‘He’s been nothing but a pain in the backside since’. He also claims that Carswell, who had access to top - secret Ukip polling informatio­n, leaked it to the Conservati­ves.

Carswell has denied the allegation, saying: ‘There is no basis in these claims whatsoever.’ The two men clashed spectacula­rly at a Ukip conference and Banks mischie - vously briefed the P ress that Carswell was probably autistic (for which he later apologised).

Nor did relations improve when Carswell’s name was ludicrousl­y linked to a sensationa­l newspaper story about a supposed attempt to assassinat­e Farage by loosening the wheel nuts of his car . Natu - rally, it was utterly unfounded.

On the political front, Carswell was chief among those Leavers insisting that Farage was an embarrassm­ent and should keep his head below the parapet.

So too did Vote Leave, an organisati­on set up by Matthew elliott, a seasoned political networker and Whitehall/Westminste­r insider, to be the principal mouthpiece of the Leave campaign.

elliott believed focusing on immigratio­n would drag the campaign into a fatal row about racism and xenophobia. He wanted to soft- pedal on this, making sovereignt­y the dominant issue of the referendum instead. B anks totally disagreed, but nonetheles­s invited elliott for drinks at his exclusive Mayfair club to discuss how they could work together . His ‘friendly tango’, as he put it, was fobbed off. Soon after , elliott announced he had £6 million-worth of backing and had lined up the support of seven Cabinet ministers.

‘Like that’s going to excite the average voter,’ was Banks’s sarcastic riposte, a clear indication of the division between him and what he reckoned was just a group of T ory toffs with no appeal to the grass - roots electorate. He was afraid they were going to blow the once -in-a-lifetime chance the Referendum gave of actually exiting the EU. He refused to bow out.

From that moment, Banks’s Leave.eU and Vote Leave were in a no-holds-barred mud-wrestling competitio­n to be Brexit top dog.

Banks thought his rivals were pedestrian, over - cautious and chaotic, with a lame message that

wouldn’t wash. ‘ P***- up and brewery come to mind,’ was his scathing verdict.

By contrast, he says in his diary, his team were hitting nearly 20 million people in a week, a third of the population, using social media.

‘We were creating an extraordin­ary mass movement, drawing in swathes of voters neglected by the main political parties.’ He was willing to court anyone and everyone — Labour supporters, trade unions and even old Lefties like Derek Hatton, the one-time Militant firebrand from Liverpool, on the grounds that ‘the EU is bad for workers’ rights’.

All the while, relations with Elliott’s Vote Leave were growing increasing­ly toxic, the war between them dirtier by the day.

Computers on both sides were said to have been hacked. Banks claimed he was being tailed by a private investigat­or and warned Elliott to watch out.

‘I have a business that specialise­s in personal security and counter intelligen­ce, using ex-MI5 and SAS operatives . . .’ He might have added that he had a Russian wife, Katya, who speaks six languages and once faced suggestion­s that she might be a spy.

Banks’s up-yours response to this allegation was to buy a personalis­ed number plate for the family Range Rover: ‘XMI5 SPY’.

Funny incidents verging on farce run through his diary. He convenes a meeting of Ukip supporters at his country estate on the outskirts of Bristol ( Old Down, which he bought in 2008 from musician Mike Oldfield of Tubular Bells fame) and veteran MEP Margot Parker trips and falls into the swimming pool in full billowing evening regalia.

‘There was a tremendous crash and we all turned to see a thrashing lump under the plastic cover.’ She was hauled out before she drowned.

Then there’s the moment when Farage, holidaying with Banks in Belize, has to be rescued from a sauna by an aide who physically fights off a local photograph­er trying to take a sneaky snap of the Ukip leader’s ‘tackle’.

And a meeting, last November, at the private residence of the Russian ambassador in London, keen for the inside track on Brexit, where Banks and sidekick Andy (Wiggy) Wigmore quaff vodka from a special batch of three bottles supposedly made exclusivel­y for Stalin.

After hours of talk and drink, says Banks, everyone was quite merry and diplomatic protocols were falling by the wayside. The ambassador revealed that he’d recently had a discussion with Foreign Secretary William Hague which had left him deeply unimpresse­d because Hague had told him Britain had no Plan B for Syria.

On their way out the ambassador gave them a gift of specially blended tea. ‘I hope it’s not radioactiv­e,’ mused Banks.

AT TIMES, being catapulted into this new world of power-brokers and celebritie­s became too much. At a star- studded reception in Washington, an over- excited and ogling ‘Wiggy’ tried to grab ‘selfies’ on his mobile phone — only for Helen Mirren to fob him off with a disdainful twitch of the nose and a Victoria’s Secret model in a slinky red dress to turn on her heel, ‘leaving him staring forlornly at her perky derrière’.

On a more serious note in Washington, an appalled Banks discovered during a meeting with a senior official of the State Department that the U.S. had ‘no contingenc­y plan for relations with the EU if we vote to leave.’ Apparently the British government had told the Americans not to bother. ‘ They say Brexit can’t possibly happen, so not to worry about it.’

In between all this political jetsetting, Banks somehow found time and energy to carry on his normal life to the full — flying off to check his diamond mines in South Africa and chancing on an eightcarat sparkler. To Kenya on a 2,500mile car rally in a beat-up banger. And to Switzerlan­d – ‘ No sign of the EU here and the Swiss seem to be coping just fine’ – for skiing with his family. (He has five children, three still living at home.)

Back home, for all the flamboyanc­e of his campaignin­g and his f***-you attitude to his critics, on serious issues, he stood his ground.

Accusation­s that he was a racist angered him ‘I take massive exception to this,’ he declares. ‘I fund multiple charities in South Africa, focusing on women and child poverty, and numerous educationa­l bursaries.’ He was hurt by ‘ these slurs’ and threatened to sue.

As for the charge of being antiimmigr­ant, he replied that it was

uncontroll­ed immigratio­n he was against, not immigrants per se, given that his own wife is Russian. He also took umbrage at the suggestion that Leavers like him wanted to ‘leave Europe’. Not true, he insisted.

Britain was geographic­ally and culturally part of Europe, and that was fine. It was the ‘political construct’ he wanted out of.

But the mud stuck. Despite piling up support, Banks lost the contest to be recognised as the official Leave organisati­on to oppose Remain. The Electoral Commission chose Elliott’s rival Vote Leave over his organisati­on.

He was furious, seeing it as an Establishm­ent stitch-up. ‘ We’ve been shafted,’ he complains. ‘It’s political corruption.’

And to drown his sorrows he went off on an almighty drinking session, ‘last stop a sleazy gay bar in Soho, the only place still open for business at 5am. I finally staggered back to Claridge’s at six.’

Farage argued that he should accept the decision and give up his separate campaign. Banks refused, insisting that Leave.EU would not quit the field. ‘In a way, we can be even more powerful now. We don’t have to pander to Cabinet ministers and can run the campaign the way we want.

‘Official approval is not our style anyway. Let the insiders stick together. We’re on the outside, where we belong.’

And so Banks and his Leave.EU organisati­on carried on just as before — buoyed up by David Cameron’s failure to negotiate a decent deal for Britain’s continued membership of the EU.

He was scathing about Cameron. ‘He’s back from Brussels but he didn’t even produce a hat, never mind a rabbit. He’s trying to claim we now have some kind of special status, but he’s got nothing, and he knows it. If he thinks this will win it for Remain, I want to know what he’s been smoking.’

As the campaign reached its climax, Banks was confident of victory, despite the fact that his Brexit movie bombed and his rock concert — which in his wildest fancy he’d seen as featuring Duran Duran, Shirley Bassey and Michael Caine arriving on stage in a Mini to The Who blasting out ‘We’re not gonna take it any more’ — never happened.

What mattered, however, was crosses on ballot papers, and the figures of signed-up support he was seeing stacked up. So did the feedback from all over the country.

Come June 23, Referendum Day, however, Farage was gloomy. ‘We’re going to lose. I can feel it in my waters,’ he kept saying.

This was typical Farage, who worried constantly that Banks had gone too far with some caper or other and might offend people unnecessar­ily. In one headlinegr­abbing event the week before, a fleet of fishing boats sailed up the Thames to demonstrat­e for Brexit outside the Houses of Parliament. There they were ambushed by a flotilla of Remainers led by a foulmouthe­d Bob Geldof.

DURING this confrontat­ion, Banks recalls, Farage was on board but hid below in case it all backfired. That day, ‘the Nelson touch distinctly failed him’, Banks records, whereas he himself was dancing with joy.

‘Salty Sea Dogs 3, Sneering Softies 0. We’d won a mass of free publicity and put fun and energy into a great cause.’And now it was crunch time. This is where it had all been going.

The polling stations were open. The nation was making up its mind. Banks tried to gee up Farage with his latest polling figures, but ‘years of political disappoint­ment had conditione­d him to expect the worst. He didn’t dare to believe it could be different this time’.

Just before the polls closed Farage told Sky News: ‘I think Remain just edged it.’ He was wrong. Six hours later, as Banks had predicted, Leave had won.

Banks savoured his victory, and bit back at the disgruntle­d losing Remain camp. ‘ These elites are shrieking because they can feel the power slipping away from them. Enough already!’

He dedicates his book ‘ To the 17.4 million’—– those who voted Out. But, from his account, you can’t help wondering if a more united Leave front might not have produced a far bigger number.

As for what happens next, he sets out his stall as unequivoca­lly as he did for the referendum itself.

‘My view is simple: we should stay tariff-free and let the EU do what they want, then introduce an immigratio­n cap of 50,000 with a £5,000 deposit from all newcomers. Britain’s economy would explode. We’d be Singapore on steroids.’

The Bad Boys Of Brexit: Tales Of Mischief, Mayhem And Guerrilla Warfare In The eU Referendum Campaign by Arron Banks is published by Biteback Publishing at £18.99. To buy a copy for £14.24 (offer valid until this Saturday) visit mailbooksh­op.co. uk or call 0844 571 0640 P&P is free on orders over £15.

 ??  ?? Swashbuckl­ing Brexiteers: Arron Banks, right, with Nigel Farage
Swashbuckl­ing Brexiteers: Arron Banks, right, with Nigel Farage
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom