Daily Mail

Facebook in dock

Web giant refuses to take down child abuse images – then reports BBC journalist to police for sending them the pictures

- By Katherine Rushton Media and Technology Editor

FACEBOOK was in the dock last night over its refusal to remove dozens of disturbing sexualised images of children. MPs vowed to make the social network’s bosses explain their ‘appalling’ failure after it said that a string of offensive pictures did not breach its community standards.

The site’s moderators approved numerous photograph­s of under-16s posing provocativ­ely, as well as stolen images of children published on a Facebook page called ‘hot xxxx schoolgirl­s’.

One image appeared to be a freeze-frame from a child abuse video.

Many of the images were posted on private Facebook groups aimed at paedophile­s eager to share content. They were often accompanie­d by obscene comments and – in one case – a specific request to share ‘child pornograph­y’.

The BBC used Facebook’s reporting button to raise the alarm about 100 of these sexualised images of children – automatica­lly sending them to the social network’s moderators for inspection.

But despite repeated pledges by Facebook to remove ‘ any sexual content involving minors’, the moderators only agreed to remove 18 of them. It said the other 82 could stay. The technology giant only agreed to remove them all when the whistleblo­wing journalist, Angus Crawford, contacted Facebook executives. Facebook asked the reporter to send over the photograph­s he thought were problemati­c – then reported him to the police for doing so.

One MP said it was extraordin­ary that the BBC had been reported when it was trying to ‘help clean up the network’.

Yesterday, Facebook admitted its moderators made a mistake but repeatedly refused to explain what went wrong. It simply issued a statement from its policy director Simon Milner confirming that the images had now gone.

‘We have carefully reviewed the content referred to us and have now removed all items that were illegal or against our standards. This content is no longer on our platform. We take this matter extremely seriously and we continue to improve our reporting and take- down measures. Facebook has been recognised as one of the best platforms on the internet for child safety,’ he said.

MPs and charities condemned Facebook’s failures as unacceptab­le and called for action against it. They also urged the police to prosecute the social network over any illegal images on its website, and suggested a change in the law to make it harder for such companies to ignore dangerous content.

An NSPCC spokesman said: ‘Facebook’s failure to remove illegal content from its website is appalling and violates the agreements they have in place to protect children. It also raises the question of what content they consider to be inappropri­ate and dangerous to children.’

Anne Longfield, the Children’s Commission­er for England, said Facebook’s behaviour was ‘deeply disappoint­ing and deeply disturbing’.

‘I find it hard to believe that individual­s at Facebook had seen these images and made a decision that they were okay and hadn’t breached their community rules,’ she said. ‘They were very explicit, they were very sexualised photos of children and some of them clearly had been taken without the children knowing.’ Labour MP Helen Goodman, a former shadow culture minister, said Facebook – and not the BBC journalist – should answer to the police.

‘It sounds as if these images are in breach of legislatio­n and so I think it’s a law-enforcemen­t issue,’ she said.

Tory MP Damian Collins vowed to haul Facebook bosses before the powerful culture, media and sport select committee, which he chairs. ‘We need to understand what has gone wrong,’ he said. ‘Facebook has a social responsibi­lity to tackle this.’

He added that there could be grounds for ‘creating a new offence of knowingly failing to act’.

Labour’s Chris Matheson, another member of the culture committee, said: ‘ Facebook’s response is unbelievab­le. There should be zero tolerance of any sexualised images of children, let alone images of sex abuse.’

The National Crime Agency, which runs the Child Exploitati­on and Online Protection Centre (CEOP), said it is ‘vital’ social media platforms report and remove indecent content. The agency would not disclose whether it is investigat­ing the BBC or the whistleblo­wing journalist.

Mr Milner said: ‘It is against the law for anyone to distribute images of child exploitati­on. When the BBC sent us such images we followed our industry’s standard practice and reported them to CEOP. We also reported the child exploitati­on images that had been shared on our own platform.

‘This matter is now in the hands of the authoritie­s.’

‘They were very explicit’

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom