Daily Mail

Was ‘Legs-it’ sexist or just a bit of fun?

-

I WAS delighted by the pithy response to the sour-faced puritans who lined up to complain about ‘Legs-it’ (Mail). Only those used to the comfort of a pious and self-regarding bubble could have seen it as anything other than a bit of light-hearted fun. Sadly for them, the bubble has burst: the agenda is no longer set by the Liberal Left. The days of the majority being made to feel embarrasse­d about their political views, social beliefs and sense of humour are gone. The response to the faux ‘outrage’ of those pompous and oppressive whiners was spot on: get a life!

JOE CONRAD, Bath.

I WAS disgusted by Sarah Vine’s ‘who won Legs-it?’ (Mail). This kind of sexism has no place in 2017. What sort of message does it give to women, especially young women — that they’ll be judged by what they wear and not their achievemen­ts? It isn’t humorous, it’s pathetic. I’m surprised that, Sarah Vine, as the mother of a girl, can be so demeaning to women.

ANNE WILLIAMS, Kingston-upon-Thames, Surrey.

IF THOSE ladies didn’t want their legs to be admired or commented on, why did they exhibit them? Our age has become the dictatorsh­ip of Political Correctnes­s and the tragedy is that, with it, we’ve lost our sense of humour.

FUAD KAVUR, London SW1.

THE Left thinks it’s ‘sexist’ to joke about two female leaders’ legs — but if we really were sexist would those two even be leaders?

PHIL NORTH, Brigg, Lincs.

YOU can bet your bottom euro that the next time Angela Merkel sits for a photo shoot with our leggy PM, she’ll be wearing the shortest lederhosen she can squeeze into. BILLY GATES, Rainham, Essex.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom