Daily Mail

DAY PRINCE CHARLES TRIED TO HALT A WAR

Book quotes US envoy on how Prince rang to ask for Afghan invasion delay

- By Sam Greenhill Chief Reporter Turn to Page 2

PRINCE Charles tried to halt the American invasion of Afghanista­n to ‘honour’ Ramadan. He made the plea to the US ambassador to London four weeks into the huge military

operation launched after the 9/11 terror attacks.

The startled envoy asked the prince, ‘Sir, are you really serious?’ according to a book being serialised from today by the Daily Mail. Charles’s interventi­on appears to have come behind the back of then prime minister Tony Blair.

Last night an officer who led UK forces in Afghanista­n said the prince’s request was absurd. Critics described it as grossly irresponsi­ble. Politician­s in the UK

are used to the prince trying to meddle in policy and his handwritte­n ‘ black spider memos’ are legendary.

Twenty thousand American and British troops were ordered to Afghanista­n by George W Bush and Mr Blair in October 2001 because the ruling Taliban had refused to give up Al Qaeda leader Osama Bin Laden.

Around a month into the offensive – and two weeks before the start of the Muslim holy month of Ramadan – Charles placed an ‘urgent call’ to William Farish, Washington’s ambassador to London.

Interviewe­d for the new biography of Charles, Mr Farish recalled: ‘Prince Charles asked me if it would be possible to stop the invasion to honour Ramadan, and if I could convey that request to President Bush.’

The ambassador explained it would be rather difficult to halt a military invasion already in full swing, but the prince allegedly protested: ‘ But Americans can do anything!’

The envoy asked: ‘Sir, are you really serious?’ and the heir to the throne replied, ‘Yes I am’.

The extraordin­ary exchange is revealed in Prince Charles: The Passions And Paradoxes Of An Improbable Life by Sally Bedell Smith. The respected historian based the biography on interviews with more than 300 friends, family and associates of the prince.

Three days after the 9/11 attacks, Charles, the Queen and Mr Blair stood shoulder to shoulder with Americans including Mr Farish at St Paul’s Cathedral for a service of remembranc­e.

The invasion was launched less than a month later on October 7, with Mr Blair declaring that ‘the stability of the world’ depended on it.

Yet at the start of November the prince was allegedly trying to thwart government policy.

‘I am somewhat surprised that Prince Charles should attempt to get involved in a military operation,’ said Colonel Richard Kemp, who subsequent­ly commanded British forces in Afghanista­n.

‘Obviously that is not what he is there for.

‘He shouldn’t have attempted to interfere at all, and let alone on the basis of Ramadan.

‘If anything, a military commander should exploit opportunit­ies like Ramadan rather than be controlled by a reli- gious festival. It shows a surprising lack of judgment, that he felt it was his place to meddle like that, and the idea that on the basis of Prince Charles’s personal opinion, the UK would dictate American military operations is just absurd. There was no option. Afghanista­n was harbouring terrorists who had launched a devastatin­g attack on the US. Who was Prince Charles to intervene?’

Graham Smith, of the antimonarc­hy campaign group Republic, said: ‘How can we tolerate a future head of state who behaves in such an irresponsi­ble unprofessi­onal manner?

‘This is one of the most serious cases of royal meddling that’s come to light. It is grossly irresponsi­ble to be interferin­g in such a serious and delicate situation and in one of the UK’s most important internatio­nal relationsh­ips.

‘People will have strong feelings about the invasion, but none of the controvers­y justifies Charles’s interferen­ce. He must be told to back off.

‘We elect a government to handle our internatio­nal relationsh­ips. Charles’s unwanted interventi­on only risks damaging our reputation and relationsh­ips with our allies.’

Mrs Bedell Smith recalls that US defence secretary Donald Rumsfeld had noted that Muslims themselves waged war in the holy month – Iran and Iraq eight times during their conflict in the 1980s, and Egyptian president Anwar Sadat in his

‘Not what he is there for’

1973 attack on Israel. She said Mr Rumsfeld added: ‘The Taliban and Al Qaeda are unlikely to take a holiday.’

Now back in America, Mr Farish, 78, was unavailabl­e for comment last night.

The book also claims that Charles tried in vain to influence Margaret Thatcher.

The confrontat­ion came in 1985, when the prince was fretting that Tory policies meant he would ‘inherit the throne of a divided Britain’.

The prime minister was ‘so incensed she called Buckingham Palace to complain’ demanding to know what was going on. Charles was said to be flabbergas­ted that Mrs Thatcher could tell him: ‘I run this country, not you, sir.’

 ??  ?? Meeting: Charles and then US envoy William Farish in 00
Meeting: Charles and then US envoy William Farish in 00

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom