Daily Mail

INTOLERANC­E!

Its religious ethos was praised four years ago. Now a Jewish school, judged academical­ly good, is facing closure for refusing to teach its young girls transgende­r issues. What a frightenin­g world we live in

- by Richard Price

TO THE affluent commuters passing by, Vishnitz Girls School looks like any other well-maintained North London townhouse.

Were it not for a glimpse of white- shirted backs hunched over desks in the front room, you would not even suspect it was a school.

Unlike most primary schools, there’s no brightly-coloured sign advertisin­g its presence. Indeed, a black- clad security guard in his sentry hut seems to be there mainly to keep unwanted visitors away.

With good reason. As one of a handful of Orthodox Jewish schools in Britain, it’s a prime target for terror attacks. Just across the Channel in France, similar schools have suffered unthinkabl­e atrocities.

Yet the threat facing Vishnitz Girls School today does not come from Islamic extremists. Instead it is under attack from a force far closer to home; a force which wants to see it, and other faith schools like it, conform to a different ideology or be summarily closed down.

The unlikely battlegrou­nd for this is LGBT (Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgende­r) rights. Last month, Vishnitz Girls School — where the teaching of Jewish and religious studies was singled out for praise by inspectors in its first Ofsted report of July 2013 — was presented with an ultimatum: teach your children about homosexual­ity and gender reassignme­nt, or we will close you down.

In the space of four years, Ofsted inspectors have now graded it as a failing school, based on this sole issue.

To those who run Ofsted it is a noble cause. But to the Haredi Jewish families who send their daughters — aged three to ten — to the school, it represents an impossible dilemma.

Members of this conservati­ve community — 30,000 of whom are centred on Stamford Hill, North London — are instantly recognisab­le by their black hats, ringlets and frock coats.

In their tradition, which, like Islam, involves segregatio­n of the genders, the issue of sex education falls to parents rather than schools. The notion of teaching a seven-year-old Haredi girl about gender reassignme­nt is anathema. Yet as far as Ofsted is concerned, Haredi schools face a simple choice: abandon a key religious principle or be closed down.

This is no isolated curiosity, affecting only the 45,000 or so British Haredi Jews. To people of faith, it is a familiar tale of the Left launching a sustained attack on religion. Now those involved in Christian schools are linking arms with Orthodox Jews to challenge what they see as the Department for Education (DfE) pushing a secularist agenda.

As Gill Robins, of Christians In Education, puts it, the DfE has launched ‘an all-out assault on faith values, sanctity of family and parental rights’.

Ofsted stands accused of ‘targeted attacks’ on faith schools, turning up without warning for inspection­s aimed at forcing them into closure.

In 2014, when Nicky Morgan succeeded Michael Gove as Secretary of State for Education, she made the significan­t step of hiring Luke Tryl, who campaigned against homophobic bullying as head of education at the gay rights group Stonewall, as a special adviser.

His close ties to the Cabinet minister gave him huge influence and his appointmen­t in 2014 coincided with a marked change in the approach to teaching LGBT issues in Britain’s schools.

The following year the charity Educate & Celebrate was handed £214,000 from a Government budget of £2 million to tackle homophobic, biphobic and transphobi­c (HBT) bullying in schools. Part of this money was used to circulate books which taught children as young as seven to stop saying ‘girl’ and ‘boy’ so they did not offend transgende­r pupils.

Mr Tryl, a former president of the Oxford Union, is a seasoned lobbyist who says homophobic bullying is ‘endemic’ in schools.

Yet there is a growing sense among teachers who do not subscribe to this mantra that this has hijacked the wider issue of bullying.

‘We have gone from anti-bullying campaigns to the specific issue of homophobic bullying, which is by its very nature more of a niche concern,’ says Gill Robins.

‘But anyone who raises an eyebrow is attacked as a bigot. We have this liberal elite who feel everything in education has to be rainbowcol­oured. It is getting out of hand.’

WHEN Theresa May sacked Nicky Morgan last summer, Luke Tryl was appointed Director of Corporate Strategy at Ofsted, and the campaign appeared to step up a gear.

Take Ofsted’s inspection of Beis Yaakov High School, a Jewish academy school in Salford, whose female pupils have lived sheltered lives with gender segregatio­n and for whom social media and smartphone­s are unknown entities.

Not a life to everyone’s tastes, but Britain has a proud tradition of tolerance, allowing others to pursue their religion without interferen­ce.

Clearly nobody had told the Ofsted inspectors. During the inspection, the girls were asked questions such as: ‘Do you have a boyfriend?’; ‘What do you know about men being married to each other?’; and ‘What do you think about Facebook?’

While a number of Islamic faith schools have been closed down following similar inspection­s, there is a crucial difference. In the case of Islamic schools, there have been genuine fears about extremism, with teachers actively instructin­g pupils that it is acceptable for a man to beat his wife and that gay people should be put to death. Some were even found to be providing access to banned extremist textbooks.

None of this is true of Jewish schools such as Beis Yaakov.

All indicators showed that the Greater Manchester school was outstandin­g, with a varied curriculum, supportive staff, happy parents, ‘positive and enthusiast­ic’ students who are ‘impeccably polite’, ‘enjoy taking responsibi­lity’ and behave so well that ‘ exclusions are non-existent’.

YET because of the pupils’ bemused responses to those insensitiv­e, inappropri­ate questions, the school was put into special measures. This meant it was graded as failing and was subject to inspection­s every three months until changes were made.

Beis Yaakov returned to a grading of ‘good’ within a year. This involved the school amending its PSHE (Personal, Social, Health and Economic education) classes to include discussion­s of homosexual­ity and transgende­r issues. The distress suffered by students as a result of the continued inspection­s was such that the school made a formal complaint.

There was a similar disconnect between the quality of education and Ofsted’s mark at Vishnitz Girls School.

The school’s first Ofsted report in July 2013 found the school ‘ good’ in all areas, saying: ‘The girls make good progress in their Kodesh (Jewish/religious studies).’ It continued: ‘Teachers know the girls well so that the needs of the girls are met well and they are eager to learn.’

Three years later, in February 2016, the school was subjected to its first unannounce­d inspection. Ofsted found that supervisio­n was good, but it did not have up-to-date policies on safeguardi­ng and the buildings required maintenanc­e work.

While the report contained no criticism of the school’s teaching standards, a line at the end of the report states: ‘The aims and ethos of the school are governed by the codes of the Torah and are based on the three tenets of Judaism: Torah, Prayer and acts of loving kindness.’

By the time of the second inspection in October 2016, Ofsted noted that while progress was being made in the areas highlighte­d by the February report, ‘the school’s policy to exclude from the curriculum reference to certain of the protected characteri­stics in the Equality Act 2010’ meant it had again failed.

By the third visit, in May, every issue in the first failed report — down to peeling paint on a wall — had been resolved. Pupils were also deemed to be ‘well-motivated, have positive attitudes to learning and are confident in thinking for themselves’.

However, it also found that: ‘Pupils are not taught explicitly about issues such as sexual orientatio­n. This restricts spiritual, moral, social and cultural developmen­t and does not take account of differing lifestyles.

‘As a result, pupils are not able to gain a full understand­ing of

fundamenta­l British values. [Teachers] do not teach pupils about all the protected characteri­stics, particular­ly those relating to gender re-assignment and sexual orientatio­n. This means that pupils have a limited understand­ing of the different lifestyles and partnershi­ps that individual­s may choose in present-day society.’

Through ofsted’s rainbowcol­oured lens, schools either pass or fail, and in hindsight this tiny Jewish private school, with annual fees of £5,500 and just 212 pupils, never stood a chance.

The injustice of it all has provoked fury in the Haredi community. Rabbi Abraham pinter is scathing in his criticism of ofsted. The rabbi, who is principal of Yesodey Hatorah Senior girls’ School in Stamford Hill, made a Freedom of Informatio­n request to ascertain how many schools had been subjected to unannounce­d inspection­s in the latter half of 2014, when they were introduced.

ofsted papers revealed that 13 schools were subjected to full unannounce­d inspection­s (which are only meant to be carried out in cases of ‘serious concern’), of which three were orthodox Jewish.

Two were Roman Catholic, one Church of england and the rest standard secular secondary schools. In terms of the proportion of schools targeted, the Jewish examples were vastly more likely to be picked on, despite being routinely among the best performers.

‘There are only ten orthodox Jewish schools in Britain, so effectivel­y one in three were singled out for the heavy treatment,’ says Rabbi pinter. ‘This is social engineerin­g at work and nothing to do with safeguardi­ng our children.’

Referring to the Vishnitz case, he condemns the ‘obsession’ with fighting ‘non- existent issues for our community’.

‘I suggest ofsted go down to the local police station and ask them about the history of homophobic abuse around here,’ he says. ‘There is none whatsoever. We are decent, tolerant people and we do not bully anybody. So why should we be forced to teach girls about issues which have nothing to do with their lives? our community promotes tolerance of all . . . But tolerance works both ways; ofsted shows none to people of faith.’

Several Christian faith schools were among the 40 subjected to unannounce­d ofsted inspection­s in late 2014 and on numerous occasions since then.

All were found to be failing ‘British values’ because although their pupils are respectful and tolerant of difference, the schools all teach that marriage is defined in the Bible as being between a man and a woman. All, because of this point, were downgraded from good to inadequate.

It is worth pausing to consider the terminolog­y. ‘British values’, according to ofsted, appear to be defined as placing the rights of people with ‘protected characteri­stics’ (in this case specifical­ly the LgBT community) above the right to religious freedom.

When parliament’s Secondary Legislatio­n Scrutiny Committee considered this term, it described the Dfe as merging ‘statutory provision with political declaratio­n’.

In other words, the Dfe and ofsted have been politicisi­ng the curriculum, breaching both human rights and education law.

As gill Robins puts it: ‘under the guise of a Trojan Horse, the Dfe is seizing an opportunit­y to bring all schools firmly into line in promoting its views on creation, sexuality and relationsh­ips.’

So where do the schools go from here? The problem with appealing an ofsted decision is that complaints are dealt with by the quango itself. Worse still for beleaguere­d faith schools, all unannounce­d inspection­s are carried out by Her Majesty’s Inspectora­te, ofsted’s elite unit. So for the faith schools to win, these HMIs would be required to overturn their own decisions.

ASpokeSMAn for ofsted says the rules were set by the Dfe, adding: ‘The standards require all independen­t schools to actively promote fundamenta­l British values and equalities, including respect for those with different faiths and beliefs.

‘These standards are enshrined in law. Schools cannot choose which parts of the legislatio­n they comply with.’

The Dfe issued a statement reiteratin­g its stance that ‘all schools must prepare pupils for the opportunit­ies and responsibi­lities of life in British society’: ‘Any school that fails to meet these standards will be subject to regulatory action to ensure every child is getting the excellent education they deserve.’

And so the war goes on. Shimon Cohen, speaking on behalf of Vishnitz girls School, tells me: ‘We are deeply disappoint­ed that ofsted feels our school has not met the Independen­t School Standards, particular­ly when its decision is focused on one complicate­d issue that is contrary to our beliefs.

‘We would like to thank the many people who have shown their support and we are heartened that there are still people who hold to true British values of tolerance to all religions and beliefs.’

A strongly worded, yet admirably restrained response, it barely hints at the fury felt by parents of children at the school.

But if ofsted’s ideologues think this community will be cowed into submission, they can think again.

‘This is a line in the sand and we will not cross it,’ one parent told me this week. ‘The mistake ofsted has made is in thinking we have a choice in the matter, but religion is our lives, and we will not budge.’

 ?? Picture: PHOTOFUSIO­N /REX/SHUTTERSTO­CK ?? Traditiona­l: Pupils at a Jewish school in North London
Picture: PHOTOFUSIO­N /REX/SHUTTERSTO­CK Traditiona­l: Pupils at a Jewish school in North London

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from UK