Daily Mail

OXFAM: NOW THE BACKLASH

UK’s biggest firms could axe donations Duke of Edinburgh scheme threatens to remove teenagers from charity shops 1,200 cancel monthly standing orders

- By Daniel Martin and Arthur Martin

Oxfam was facing a devastatin­g backlash from sponsors, celebritie­s and donors last night over its sex abuse scandal.

Major firms said they would review their relationsh­ip with the charity because of its failure to protect the vulnerable. Visa and Marks & Spencer both spoke out against ‘abhorrent’ and ‘deeply concerning’ behaviour by Oxfam staff. The Duke of Edinburgh Award scheme has threatened to stop its children working in the charity’s shops following allegation­s of abuse across its store network.

And more than 1,200 people have cancelled their monthly donations to Oxfam after reports emerged of its aid workers using prostitute­s.

Minnie Driver became the first of the charity’s global ambassador­s to break ranks and quit in protest.

The actress is stepping down after 20 years, saying she was horrified by the allegation­s.

As former internatio­nal developmen­t secretary Priti Patel led calls

for Oxfam chief executive Mark goldring to stand down:

It emerged that the Oxfam aid boss in the Haiti sex scandal had been forced out of another UK charity for allegedly using prostitute­s in liberia;

The president of Haiti accused the charity of an ‘extremely serious violation of human dignity’;

The chairman of Oxfam Internatio­nal, Juan alberto Fuentes, was arrested in a government corruption probe in his native guatemala;

a report revealed that in 2006 there had not been a humanitari­an response in which Oxfam had not had to sack an aid worker for ‘exploiting or abusing’ beneficiar­ies;

almost 5,000 serious incidents where children and vulnerable adults were put at risk were reported to the charities regulator over the past six years;

Miss Patel’s successor Penny Mordaunt warned that she would withdraw funds from any charity that failed to protect the vulnerable.

Many of Oxfam’s corporate donors were considerin­g distancing themselves from the organisati­on last night.

Only Waterstone­s fully backed the charity, saying: ‘We remain a committed supporter of Oxfam. The work of the charity, as of its peers, is of great value. We listen to, and seek to understand, the assurances given by the Oxfam leadership.’

But a spokesman for Visa described the revelation­s as ‘deeply concerning’, saying the financial firm was talking to Oxfam to understand what had happened and what the response would be.

‘We are committed to the highest standards of profession­al and personal conduct, and we expect the same from our partners,’ the spokesman said.

an M&S spokesman said: ‘These are very serious allegation­s. M&S continues to monitor the situation very closely as we seek to understand the steps that Oxfam is taking to address them and develop a robust safeguardi­ng plan for the future.’

‘This is a defining moral issue’

James daunt, managing director of Waterstone­s, said the allegation­s were ‘reprehensi­ble and beyond comprehens­ion’. ‘It sounds as though what went on in Haiti betrays the fundamenta­l values of Oxfam,’ he added. ‘ The part we have worked with I have been impressed by, though that is not to excuse the utterly abhorrent behaviour in Haiti.

‘I expect Oxfam to give a full and frank explanatio­n, and if there is something to apologise for, to apologise.’

The Innocent drinks company, which gives Oxfam around £100,000 a year, said it wanted to see immediate action.

richard reed, the millionair­e co-founder of the juice firm, said: ‘ as a corporate sponsor, we would want to see a very, very clear comprehens­ive plan for how this could not ever happen again.

‘If these actions turn out to be true, then of course we would revisit the funding. Because you’re giving money to do good. You’re not giving money to do these other things.’

Heathrow airport, which has a corporate partnershi­p with Oxfam, said: ‘ We are in touch with the charity and are taking this matter very seriously.’

The Co- operative Bank said: ‘ We are monitoring the situation closely.’

Three other major partners – Sainsbury’s, unilever and accenture – did not respond to requests last night to issue public backing.

Mr goldring has emailed corporate donors to say he felt ‘great shame in the behaviour of those few who did not uphold Oxfam’s or society’s values’. The revelation­s had been ‘painful and shocking for Oxfam supporters’ but did not represent the charity, he wrote.

In just three days individual donors have withdrawn 1,270 direct debit instructio­ns, Oxfam admitted yesterday. The cancellati­ons represente­d a possible loss of £12,039 a month, or £144,468 a year, based on the average monthly gift of £9.48.

Mark Mcelroy, 82, from derby, told the guardian: ‘I have been a direct debit contributo­r for several years. I am shocked that some of my donations have been used in the way it appears. If these allegation­s are not true then I shall reinstate the direct debit I cancelled today.’

earlier in the week it emerged that not all Oxfam shop volunteers had had criminal record checks – and that the charity had received multiple allegation­s, including of abuse of children by volunteers.

a spokesman for the duke of edinburgh’s award said: ‘The safety of participan­ts is the dofe’s biggest priority. In light of these allegation­s, we will be reviewing our associatio­n with Oxfam as a participan­t volunteeri­ng provider.’

Miss Patel said: ‘The abuse and crimes committed by aid workers are appalling.

‘Heads of all organisati­ons are ultimately responsibl­e and accountabl­e for the actions and inactions that happen which cause serious harm to others. This scandal has been mishandled from the start and Mark goldring needs to step down so Oxfam can rebuild their reputation and focus on helping the poorest in the world. This is a defining moral issue, there can be no more excuses, we need accountabi­lity, justice and a voice for the victims now.’

Mr goldring has refused to step down even after admitting he had not acted quickly enough when a whistleblo­wer raised concerns about abuse.

Helen evans, Oxfam’s former head of safeguardi­ng, accused her bosses and the Charity Commission of not doing enough when she revealed allegation­s that its workers had been involved in abuse.

Tory MP Nigel evans, who is a member of the Commons internatio­nal aid committee, also said Mr goldring should go.

His deputy, Penny lawrence, fell on her sword on Monday.

leading charities met yesterday to discuss zero tolerance of sexual exploitati­on. They adopted a code that included protecting whistleblo­wers and informing regulators of incidents and allegation­s.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom