Daily Mail

Hammond the Brexit saboteur must go, top Tories demand

- By Daniel Martin Policy Editor

PHILIP Hammond faced calls to quit last night as Tory grandees accused him of trying to ‘sabotage’ Brexit with a dire warning about the consequenc­es of failing to reach a deal.

The Chancellor’s gloomy prediction came shortly after his colleague Dominic Raab, the Brexit Secretary, tried to play down the risks of leaving the European Union without a trade agreement.

Mr Hammond’s interventi­on angered No 10, which did not clear his analysis, and Brexiteers accused him of relaunchin­g Project Fear while underminin­g the Government’s Brexit strategy.

In a letter released on Thursday, the Chancellor said a no-deal Brexit could hit growth of the country’s GDP by as much as 10 per cent and cost the economy £80billion in extra borrowing.

Hours earlier, Mr Raab struck a more upbeat tone when he unveiled the Government’s preparatio­ns for a no-deal exit. He suggested most consumers would not even notice the effects.

Last night Tory peer Lord Tebbit said: ‘Philip Hammond should either accept the result of the referendum, as the Government has, or he should go.

‘He is not accepting collective responsibi­lity of the Government. This Government was elected on the promise it would honour the outcome of the referendum. It does not appear he accepts that.’

He added: ‘This letter is another page in the book of fear which has been proved false by events. There’s no reason to think this instalment will be any different.’

Former chancellor Lord Lawson added: ‘Philip Hammond has always been trying to sabotage Brexit and this is nothing new.

‘I’ve said before the Prime Minister would do well to move him to another job but I don’t think she is strong enough to do so.

‘This letter contains a totally absurd projection based on assessing the economy just on terms of trade and not other matters which are very significan­t. It’s not worth the paper it is written on. Philip Hammond has had an agenda and he is pursuing it.’

Tory MP Marcus Fysh also hinted that Mr Hammond should Warning: Philip Hammond be sacked, tweeting: ‘Seems the Cabinet hasn’t yet bothered to sort out the Treasury’s substandar­d work.

‘This is proof it is nothing but scaremonge­ring and it’s shocking the proponents are still in post.’

A Downing Street source said Mr Hammond’s analysis was ‘preliminar­y and very much a work in progress’, adding that No 10 ‘does not clear ministers’ correspond­ence with fellow MPs’.

Shadow Chancellor John McDonnell said Mr Hammond’s letter and its timing amounted to a Brexit ‘hand grenade’.

Tory MP Nadine Dorries said: ‘Philip Hammond will do anything in his power to stop Brexit.

‘The timing of his interventi­on and his underminin­g of Dominic Rabb, proves he is working against the wishes of 17.4million people who voted for Brexit. The fact that he is still Chancellor is probably an indication that No 10 is not as committed to Brexit as they would like us to believe.’

Her colleague Simon Clarke told Radio 4’s World At One programme that Mr Hammond’s interventi­on had weakened the Government’s position.

He said: ‘The Government’s position is that no deal is not what is being worked towards and we want a good deal with the EU that is in everyone’s interests.

‘But equally, it cannot be a deal at any price and no deal remains a perfectly viable option. And here we have the Chancellor making it very clear that in his eyes it isn’t.

‘That is not a helpful interventi­on – it absolutely goes against the spirit of what the Government is trying to negotiate. It weakens our country’s position in these negotiatio­ns.’ He added: ‘I hope it is the last time we have this ridiculous game of constantly trying to scare the British people into backtracki­ng on a decision we made two years ago.’

But Cabinet Office minister David Lidington defended the Chancellor, telling Radio 4’ s Today programme: ‘This is provisiona­l analysis that the Treasury published back in January and I think all Philip was doing was simply referring back to that in response to a senior MP.’

He said a no- deal Brexit was ‘not a desirable objective’.

The row came after World Trade Organisati­on director-general Roberto Azevedo said a no-deal Brexit would ‘not be the end of the world’, atlhough he warned that it would not be ‘a walk in the park either’.

EEYORE HAMMOND LAUNCHES PROJECT FEAR (Pt2) From yesterday’s Mail

WHAT on Earth was Philip Hammond playing at?

For a few short hours on Thursday, the Government was having a rare good day on Brexit. The first tranche of preparatio­n papers for no deal had been released, and, thankfully, fears they would be stuffed full of scaremonge­ring proved unfounded.

Brexit Secretary Dominic Raab – who is growing in stature with every day – made a thoughtful and measured speech. His ‘overriding priority’ was to secure a good deal with the EU and he was confident agreement could be found. But of course, he added, a responsibl­e government has to plan for every eventualit­y.

For good measure, he gently chided Brussels officials, urging them to look beyond preserving their political project to the ‘lives and livelihood­s’ of people in this country and on the Continent.

So far, so good. Then suddenly, enter stage left: Eeyore the donkey, with a great braying Remoan.

In a letter to Treasury committee chairman and arch-priestess of Remain Nicky Morgan, the Chancellor claimed ‘no deal’ could wipe nearly 10 per cent off GDP over 15 years, and saddle Britain with £80billion of extra borrowing.

Without bothering to consult No 10, or indeed Mr Raab – who has every right to be furious – the Chancellor thus destroyed his Cabinet colleague’s careful work and put a bomb under fragile Tory unity.

But to what end? Surely he must know that after George Osborne’s Project Fear guesswork unravelled, no one takes such doom-mongering seriously. This, after all, is the department that claimed a vote for Leave would deliver an ‘immediate and profound economic shock’ and send unemployme­nt spiralling.

In reality, Treasury coffers have enjoyed their biggest monthly budget surplus for 18 years and the jobs market is booming.

No, the Mail can only assume this was an act of sabotage, designed to enrage Tory Brexiteers and undermine their case for moving to World Trade Organisati­on terms. If so, Mr Hammond is deeply misguided.

To put our cards on the table, the Mail has never endorsed ‘no deal’. This paper, like Mrs May, wants a strong deal to preserve economic and security ties after Brexit, and we accept that in the short term, leaving without a deal would be painful and messy.

But the ineluctabl­e truth is that we must be ready to take that step. Principall­y because – as the most basic negotiatin­g tactics dictate – such preparatio­ns encourage the EU to offer us a good deal.

So all Mr Hammond has done is undermine our negotiator­s, and just when preening Brussels commissar Michel Barnier is showing signs of softening his red lines, under pressure from member states who desperatel­y want to preserve access to British markets.

Not for the first time, the Mail urges Mr Hammond to restrain his inner Eeyore, observe a period of silence – and let our negotiator­s get on with the job.

 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom