Energy drinks ‘may be no worse for kids than coffee’

HEALTH experts have found little evidence that caffeine- based energy drinks pose a greater threat to children’s health and behaviour than coffee, tea or chocolate.

A discussion paper produced by the Government’s Committee on Toxicity has called into question Theresa May’s plan to ban sales of the high- caffeine drinks, such as Red Bull, to youngsters.

In August, the Prime Minister announced plans for a ban on sales to under 16s – and potentially under 18s – following concerns raised by some health campaigners, including Jamie Oliver, and teachers.

Critics claim the drinks fuel disruptive, ‘risky’ behaviour, which harms learning and can also lead to sleep problems. But the paper questions whether the problems may actually be a reflection of the way teenagers normally behave ‘arising from biological and social development’. And it says

‘Questions the conclusions’

the fact the drinks are often mixed with alcohol ‘may lead to exacerbation of “risky” behaviours’. It was presented to the committee’s expert members this week, and they will use it to decide whether to advise the Government to go-ahead with the ban.

The paper includes details of many research projects from around the world which appear to have identified harmful effects, but it questions the reliability of the conclusions.

It says children’s greatest exposure to caffeine is through coffee, tea and chocolate, rather than energy drinks. And it points out that there is 80mg of caffeine in a standard 250ml can of energy drink, while a standard cup of coffee from a high street chain is likely to contain more than 95mg.

The paper says there may be concerns about heavy consumption of the drinks for those suffering from pre- existing medical conditions as Long QT Syndrome, which is linked to fast, chaotic heartbeats. But it questions whether there is good evidence to show a link to bad behaviour or health issues in all young people.