Daily Mail

Firms pull ads from YouTube over videos watched by paedophile­s

- By Katherine Rushton Media and Technology Editor

NESTLE and Disney have pulled their adverts from YouTube after it emerged that paedophile­s are using the Google-owned platform to prey on young girls.

Epic, the computer games company behind Fortnite, and health food brand Dr Oetker also removed their adverts from the website.

They took action after it was revealed that predators are routinely using the website to watch scantily-clad children – usually pre-pubescent girls – performing on camera.

Children are posting innocent videos of themselves doing gymnastics or performing dance routines, only for paedophile­s to hijack them and post sexual comments below.

They often declare what they would like to do to the children in question, or address the youngsters directly and ask them to perform sex acts.

Disturbing­ly, the paedophile­s also use the comments section of these videos as a message board, where they share details of private messaging groups where they can communicat­e undetected.

They even direct each other to what they see as the most titillatin­g moments on the videos, posting ‘timestamps’ that link to their favourite moments.

The timestamps are automatica­lly turned into links, so that other perverts can see these moments without watching the full videos.

The scale of the problem has been laid bare by YouTuber Matt Watson, who has lambasted Google for profiting from a ‘soft core paedophili­a ring’ on its network. YouTube makes money from the paedophile activity by selling advertisin­g space next to the hijacked videos.

YouTube typically hands a slice of the revenues from these commercial­s to the person that posted the video, while the rest helps to inflate Google’s own profits.

In 2017, Google had to quell another advertisin­g revolt by promising brands that it would disable the comments on videos that it identified as of potential interest to predators.

It also pledged to shut down the accounts that made the sexual comments. However, yesterday it was clear that the problem was still rife.

One video seen by the Mail purported to show a girl aged around ten, with cerebral palsy, receiving a medical massage. Below the film – which has been watched more than two million times since it was posted last summer – dozens of users have made sexual comments.

Mr Watson – who posts videos under the name MattsWhatI­tIs – said he does not want ‘another cent’ from YouTube.

In a 20-minute video posted on Sunday, he showed how, after just five clicks on YouTube, he ended up being bombarded with supposedly innocent posts by young children that have been hijacked by vile predators. ‘ Once you are in this ... there is nothing but more videos of little girls,’ Mr Watson said in his video.

He said the comments and many of the videos he flagged have now been removed from the website.

However, many of the accounts used by the predators are still active, and it took reporters at this newspaper a matter of minutes to find other examples of the same behaviour.

Yesterday, YouTube insisted that it has ‘ clear policies’ banning this ‘abhorrent’ material and said it has stepped up its crackdown.

It has disabled comments on tens of millions of videos featuring minors, and reviewed and deleted inappropri­ate comments from other videos. It has also closed 400 user accounts because of the comments they left on other people’s videos.

A Nestle spokesman said the firm had decided to ‘pause’ its advertisin­g on YouTube.

‘We will revise our decision upon completion of current measures being taken,’ she said.

Epic Games said it had stopped its adverts from appearing on YouTube while it waits to hear what actions it will take to ‘eliminate this type of content from their service.’

‘Abhorrent material’

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom