Daily Mail

TIC-TAC MAN WHO BLEW THROUGH THE BETTING RING LIKE A WINDSTORM

- SPECIALIST CORRESPOND­ENT OF THE YEAR by JONATHAN McEVOY

THERE were two John McCriricks, predictabl­y enough for somebody who clowned in public. One centred on the extravagan­t performanc­e he presented to television audiences: madcappery dressed up in a deerstalke­r hat. But behind it lay a serious journalist, every newspaper open on his desk in race-track press rooms or before breakfast at his mews house in Primrose Hill.

To the end, he was cutting out clippings of stories to augment his rich bank of racing knowledge. These were the remnants of the award-winning reporter he had been, which, in turn, was the foundation block for the revolution he wrought in TV coverage during 30 years at the top.

Beneath the brash hollering for which he won avid admirers, there was a more sensitive side, one that felt mortally slighted by his marginalis­ation by the TV people who had once clamoured for his services. Society’s mores had changed, but his act had not.

If anything, the McCririck persona developed into a caricature of itself, not least on his ill-begotten forays into reality television. His critics cried chauvinism. And so, time caught up with the great jester a few years before he died yesterday aged 79.

But, in his bellowing prime, McCririck blew through the betting ring like a windstorm. He was the original antidote to racing’s staid broadcasti­ng exemplars: the incomparab­le Sir Peter O’Sullevan’s mellifluou­s illuminati­ons in the commentary box and the immaculate diction of Julian Wilson in front of camera.

Like Wilson, McCririck went to Harrow. He left with three O-Levels, as many, he noted, as John Major. He sought a career in the diplomatic service but he was somehow deemed unsuitable.

‘Essentiall­y,’ he once said, ‘my old school educated chaps like me to go out into the big world and

administer vast tracts of the empire and sentence a few natives to death. The only problem was that by the time they’d finished with us there was no empire to administer, so here I am, dear boy, on the rails at Cheltenham.’

Where the BBC’s Wilson stood for officer-class asperity, McCririck was the people’s representa­tive. Before him, betting was merely tolerated by television racing as a necessary evil but one that sullied the Sport of Kings. The odds were handed down sniffily by a voiceover man with the aid of bald captions, noses held all round.

But McCririck, street- smart with rapier wit and a savage delight when the bookmakers took a beating, rewrote the rules.

He was a natural in front of the camera, his charisma zooming straight through the lens. That was first evident in the early Eighties when he was invited by ITV to do a piece at Newmarket on the art of tic-tac semaphore used by bookmakers.

He was soon signed up and tic-tacing like a dervish. He came with insight garnered at the

Sporting Life, where he won national honours as specialist and campaignin­g journalist of the year in consecutiv­e years in the late Seventies, and as a sub-editor on Grandstand.

Now he was in his natural metier, the ‘betting jungle’, the term he coined for his excitable workplace. He cut that distinctiv­e appearance: giant sideburns, an array of hats, outlandish suits, two gold wrist watches and three rings on either hand with giant horseshoes on each so big he must have needed help steering them on.

‘I picked up some tic-tac when I was a bookmaker but never mastered it,’ he said. ‘That’s why I’m a failed bookmaker. The public haven’t spotted it yet but the real experts just fall about laughing.’

Not that he ever showed the ‘experts’ too much respect. Once at Chester, he was angry to see the bookmakers in the centre of the course offering odds shorter than those in the enclosure. He thought this exploitati­on of the once-a-year punter less versed in turf accountanc­y and took a camera with him as he challenged the offending bookies face to face.

And if heckled by beery racegoers, his alert mind came back with a nimble retort, or simply: ‘Grow up!’

Nobody in television operated so often in the middle of the masses.

‘Come racing,’ was his yelp of tthe evangelist. His colleagues on

Channel 4 Racing were regularly asked what McCririck was really like. Brough Scott said: ‘You see tthe saner side of him.’

AWAY from the microphone, McCririck the journalist was full of ideas for the show. And, back at home, where he lived in a house of upper-middleclas­s gentility, he barked orders to his wife, aka ‘ Booby’, from a throne-like armchair, where he held court while smoking a Cuban cigar with cats and his beloved Labradors at his feet.

He called his wife ‘Booby’ — she had the moniker proudly on her business card — after the bird that ‘flaps and squawks’. However, the notion of a downtrodde­n wife of 47 years was misplaced, and one she refuted in the interviews she gave in his defence when he was arraigned for perceived chauvinism.

Jenny, her real name, was tough; often the ‘straight man’ in the double act they presented for the cause of public notoriety.

I can attest to his kindness to new faces at the races. Others talk of his generosity to the young. But these qualities counted for little when his weakness for a giant pay cheque lured him on to

Celebrity Big Brother and shows of even more dubious merit.

On Big Brother, he refused to talk for two days when denied the Diet Coke he craved. Silence? A first, his colleagues laughed, if only. And the sight of him in giant Y-fronts was surely one of the greatest abominatio­ns of early 21st Century television. It was incongruou­s that this loner, the

public extrovert who lived an essentiall­y private life, a creature of habit with his annual holidays to Florida and Arizona, should welcome a camera held up to his every living moment.

And doubly so, when, unlike some of the unknowns with whom he shared the house, he had no need to create celebrity, being a figure of national recognitio­n.

This detour was part of his inexorable slip towards television rejection. He was dropped unceremoni­ously by Channel 4, sacked over the phone in 2012, no tribute to them or due respect to him.

He was devastated. He howled, ‘age discrimina­tion’, and took his employers to court for £3million. Channel 4 insisted he had been dropped for being ‘offensive’ and ‘disgusting’. The tribunal agreed, finding against him: ‘All the evidence is that Mr McCririck’s pantomime persona, together with his bigoted and male chauvinist views, were unpalatabl­e to a wider audience.’

Where he had once been TV’s go-to man for the well- crafted soundbite on any given racing matter, he was gradually ostracised by all media outlets. He turned up at races ready for action, yet was increasing­ly unused. He never learned to live without the red light.

Whenever possible, he plugged his hobby horses, the Tory free marketeer keen on banning the whip, but the manner of his argument had lost its old dexterity.

Such pleasures as he took in his dotage were three-fold. He delighted when Channel 4 lost their racing rights to ITV, was chuffed by Brexit and delirious about Trump’s presidenti­al win.

Lionised, derided, but never ignored, John McCririck died one of racing’s best-known figures, alongside Frankie Dettori, and behind only the Queen.

TIME CAUGHT UP WITH THE GREAT JESTER A FEW YEARS BEFORE HE DIED

 ?? PA/GETTY IMAGES ?? Trailblaze­r: McCririck with the 1983 Thames TV racing team of (from left) Graham Goode, John Oaksey, Brough Scott, Judith Chalmers and Derek Thompson, and (above) in his usual flamboyant form at Royal Ascot in 2017
PA/GETTY IMAGES Trailblaze­r: McCririck with the 1983 Thames TV racing team of (from left) Graham Goode, John Oaksey, Brough Scott, Judith Chalmers and Derek Thompson, and (above) in his usual flamboyant form at Royal Ascot in 2017
 ??  ??
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom