Daily Mail

15MILLION REASONS TO THINK AGAIN, BARCLAYS!

That’s how many times its savers made cash withdrawal­s from post offices in a year. So why IS the bank banning them?

- By Tom Witherow Business Correspond­ent

FURIOUS customers last night savaged Barclays for axeing cash withdrawal­s at post offices.

Around 15million transactio­ns were carried out last year – 41,000 a day – yet the bank is to end the vital service from January. This will leave its customers with longer journeys to access their savings at fast-disappeari­ng cash machines and high street branches.

The Mail has been inundated with letters and emails from customers threatenin­g to desert Barclays.

And an online petition calling for the decision to be reversed has already attracted 4,000 signatures.

MPs told Barclays boss Jes Staley to perform a ‘rapid U-turn’ yesterday.

Anger at the move has been amplified by the bank’s programme of closures. Bosses have shut 481 branches since 2015, leaving many communitie­s reliant on post offices.

Barclays will reportedly save only

£7million a year from the decision. This compares with a £3.5billion profit last year and the £7.2million Mr Staley has been paid in the past two years.

Wendy Dale, 65, a Barclays customer of 40 years from Broome, Worcesters­hire, said: ‘I’m incensed, Barclays are being hugely arrogant and contemptuo­us of their customers. They must reverse their decision or I will move bank.’

Rachel Reeves, the Labour chairman of the Commons business committee, said: ‘The outcry which has followed this inexcusabl­e decision should jolt Barclays into coming to their senses and ensure they do the right thing by performing a rapid U-turn on this policy.

‘Stopping customers accessing their own money from post offices is a dreadful move from Barclays and they should read the writing on the wall and reverse their decision.’

Peter Hall of the National Federation of Sub-Postmaster­s said Barclays had claimed customers would not be inconvenie­nced – and this was ‘deliberate­ly misleading or desperatel­y misguided’.

He added: ‘In a great many cases, there simply will be no alternativ­e solution for these customers. It is not too late to reverse it before they see an exodus of customers.’

Barclays customers will still be able to deposit cheques and cash and check their balances at post offices but they will no longer be able to withdraw money using their debit card. At present they can take out up to £300 a day over the counter.

Responding to criticism of its plan, the bank has said it would ring-fence 100 rural branches and partner with 200 local retailers to provide a cashback service.

But James Lowman of the Associatio­n of Convenienc­e Stores, which represents over 33,000 local shops, said: ‘Retailers should not be expected to have to take on additional services just because banks don’t want to benefit their customers by providing a cash machine or withdrawal service at the post office.’

In the case of one town – Grassingto­n in North Yorkshire – Barclays customers will now not be able to access their savings because the last branch has shut and there is no cash machine.

When the bank closed in May, Barclays placated customers by telling them they would still be able to access banking services at the post office 70 yards away – a promise that lasted only 137 days.

Pauline Clanchy, 77, from Bisbrooke, near Uppingham, Rutland, said: ‘They’re putting profit before customer service, I’m annoyed especially after our local Barclays branch closed down.

‘There’s no bus service in our village and we’re starting to feel isolated. I’m considerin­g moving bank if they don’t reverse their decision. To go to the nearest branch is a 20-mile round trip.’

John Moorhouse, from Shipham in Somerset, called the cash withdrawal­s ban a ‘retrograde step’. He said: ‘All the local Barclays banks closed years ago, the nearest ones now being in Westonsupe­r-Mare, a 24-mile round trip, and Bristol, a 32-mile round trip.’

The withdrawal ban is expected to affect tens of thousands of Barclays customers in rural areas even though, ‘subject to arrangemen­t’, they will still be able to withdraw cash by cheque.

A deal known as the ‘banking framework’ allows customers of 28 high street banks to withdraw and deposit cash and pay in cheques at post offices. The network processed five million cash deposits on behalf of Barclays last year.

The contract between the Post Office and banks lasts until 2022. It provides vital income for struggling postmaster­s, who receive commission each time they carry out banking services.

The Mail has been campaignin­g to protect local post offices and maintain access to cash for the vulnerable or isolated. High streets lost 3,300 bank branches, around a third of the network, between January 2015 and August 2019.

A Barclays spokesman said: ‘Our commitment means none of our customers will be without access to cash. Despite removing cash withdrawal­s, our financial contributi­on to the Post Office for the banking framework will actually increase in 2020.’

John Mann, a Labour member of the Commons Treasury committee, said: ‘Barclays are out of touch with the public mood. When cash machines and branches have been removed, the post office remains a key part of the financial infrastruc­ture.’

IS ‘ customer service’ a misnomer to Barclays? Not content with shutting countless branches and free- to- use cashpoint machines, the bank has now banned account holders from withdrawin­g money from post offices.

It’s not as if this disgracefu­l measure affects only one man and his dog. Last year, loyal customers used the network for 15million transactio­ns. Tin- eared Barclays bosses may fixate on ‘cashless’ online banking to maximise their gargantuan profits.

But for many, especially the elderly in remote communitie­s, notes and coins are indispensa­ble. Furthermor­e, losing business will threaten the future of post offices already stricken by financial hardship.

In the crash, the banks treated customers with disdain. A decade on, it’s happening again. Irresponsi­ble and contemptuo­us, Barclays’ decision must be reversed.

 ??  ?? From the Mail: October 8
From the Mail: October 8

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom