Daily Mail

NOT A MONEY TREE — BUT A MAGIC FOREST THAT WOULD RUIN US

- By Alex Brummer CITY EDITOR

LABOUR wants to spend £400billion on a radical green agenda and investment splurge. It would spend an estimated £200billion nationalis­ing rail, utilities and Royal Mail. And John McDonnell aims to seize 10 per cent of every firm with more than 250 staff and hand it to workers – at a cost of £300billion. The total is not far off £1trillion. Labour appears intent on financial suicide...

What is McDonnell proposing?

THE party will set up three huge funds to organise, manage and enforce its spending spree. First, there will be a social transforma­tion Fund loaded with £150billion of borrowed money for schools, hospitals, care homes and council houses over five years. the second is a national transforma­tion Fund – so far uncosted – to make sure the regions receive their share of the booty.

thirdly, a Green transforma­tion Fund will invest in sustainabl­e energy over the next decade. this is to include £60billion of funding to make every house greener through the use of insulation, solar and wind power and energy choices other than fossil fuels. the ambition of what these three funds aim to carry out is mind boggling, the bureaucrac­y looks like something out of the soviets’ ‘central committee’ rule book, and the cost is staggering. instead of borrowing £25billion a year the UK would double it to £55billion, forcing up national debt (which is currently falling) and destroying the hard-earned stability of the last decade.

the plan may look wonderful on paper. But the practicali­ties seem insurmount­able. Building developmen­t plans could be caught up in the planning process for months and finding enough people to do the skilled building jobs required would be all but impossible. Work on crossrail in London began in 2009. A decade later it is still far from being delivered, precisely because of these capacity and technical constraint­s.

A charter for jobsworths

LABOUR plans to break up the treasury (actually one of Whitehall’s smallest department­s) and devolve powers to the regions. it is planning to open ‘offices of government’ in every region to be staffed by civil servants

moved outside London. Their priorities will be set by a Sustainabl­e Investment Board which will decide how much should be funnelled through something called Local Transforma­tion Funds.

These will, in turn, report to an Executive Board, which will be accountabl­e to a General Assembly. Labour has give us no costings for these trusts, boards, quangos and assemblies, or acknowledg­ed civil servants may not want to be shifted out of Whitehall. There is no informatio­n on how governance problems and conflicts of interest – notorious at local government levels – will be avoided. The plan reads like a recipe for red tape and a charter for jobsworths.

Who’s going to pay for it?

NO specific tax policies have been released by Labour, although it has made plain it plans to soak billionair­es, including Britain’s richest man Sir Jim Ratcliffe and the Duke of Westminste­r.

It also wants to impose higher income taxes on anyone earning more than £50,000 and to raise corporatio­n taxes. But even so, it will have little chance of funding its spend, spend, spend proposals. This means much of what it plans to do will be on credit – the equivalent of payday lending for government.

McDonnell proposes some accounting tricks such as classifyin­g assets in the hands of the National Transforma­tion Fund as a benefit rather than a cost.

Its operations will be directly financed by issuing ten-year government bonds. But who would buy such bonds, unless mandated to do so by government, is left unsaid. This is important as government bonds in badly run economies, from Venezuela to Argentina, are regarded by markets as almost worthless. And McDonnell’s only fiscal rule is borrowing for investment will be excluded from fiscal targets – which essentiall­y means the sky is the limit.

McDonnell hasn’t just discovered a magic money tree, but a whole money forest.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom