Daily Mail

THRESHING MACHINE

City chewed up and spat out by Liverpool’s

- IAN LADYMAN Football Editor at Anfield

WHEN Mo Salah stooped to head Andrew Robertson’s cross into the net in the 13th minute, a Manchester City fan in a sheepskin coat behind the goal put his head in his hands.

On the touchline, City manager Pep Guardiola wore that look he tends to save for visits to Anfield. They both knew what everybody else here knew.

It was over almost before it had properly got started. Again.

Once again City had come to Anfield fully prepped and ready. The plan was set. Once again they found themselves blinded by the lights of Liverpool’s dazzling early football, cut to ribbons by the Premier League leaders’ rapier counter-attacking thrusts.

Everything that followed — everything good that City did in this game — took place in the context of those first 13 minutes. City knew it was coming. They know how Liverpool start games, they know how they play. But at times it must be like trying to move out of the way of a steam train only to find that your laces are tied to the tracks.

There was controvers­y here. VAR was front and centre again. Trent Alexander-Arnold could not have complained had he been pulled up for handball a minute before Liverpool’s first goal. Had City scored first, this game could have turned out differentl­y.

But that does not detract from the remarkable fact that City and their gilded coach Guardiola have still — after three-and-a-half years of trying — not found a way of dealing with what waits for them when they step out on to the field at Anfield.

Of this City team, the left back Angelino and deep midfielder Rodri had not experience­d this before. They must have wondered what the fuss was all about.

Now they know. Once Liverpool find a gear, they move forwards like a threshing machine. It doesn’t take them long to win a game and it didn’t take long here.

Guardiola has tried most things now. Last season his team sat as deep as a Guardiola side will ever sit and would have snatched victory in a tight game had they not missed a late penalty. Here they sought to dominate possession and for long periods they did so. Much of what City did was impressive. When Guardiola said after the game his team had played well, it was easy to understand what he meant.

But playing against this Liverpool team can be a unique experience in that even when much of what you do is right, things can still go horribly wrong. That is how it was for City here.

If we want to pick at things, we can ask why Guardiola chose his best central midfielder to play in defence. We could ask why he has allowed himself to be saddled with a back-up goalkeeper who, no matter his reputation, is not suited to the frenetic nature of English football.

But City didn’t lose here because of Fernandinh­o or Claudio Bravo. They lost because Liverpool no longer believe they can fail at Anfield. Whatever it is that Jurgen Klopp’s players have once their wheels start to turn, we could all do with some. If they could bottle it, we would be in the queue.

This was not a complete Liverpool performanc­e. They would have liked to have controlled the game’s rhythm a little more, would have liked a little more control of the ball.

However, Liverpool’s football in bursts was devastatin­g.devastatin­g City were slightly culpable in the build-up to the first goal. Sergio Aguero stopped playing as he appealed for the handball against AlexanderA­rnold, then Ilkay Gundogan cleared poorly to the feet of goalscorer Fabinho.

Later on, Gundogan erred again, failing to track Jordan Henderson dutifully enough as the Liverpool captain reached the byline to cross superbly for Sadio Mane to score.

The second goal? That one was unstoppabl­e and one of the finest this stadium has seen.

Some may remember a sweeping move that went Johnson-HeighwayMc­Dermott as Liverpool beat Tottenham 7-0 in 1978. This one went Alexander-Arnold-RobertsonS­alah and was every bit as good. McDermott’s goal, incidental­ly,

was his team’s seventh. It was decoration. Salah’s was fundamenta­l to the result and there is a difference.

Wounded so badly so early, City’s response was positive. They may argue that little things didn’t go their way. Angelino struck a post while Aguero maybe should have scored when played clear.

A goal to City at 2-0 and they would have had a major say in this game. As it was, their solitary goal came too late.

All that was left beyond that was the theatre and there was plenty of it. Guardiola looked like a man caught up in the most excitable game of charades ever as he gestured to Liverpool supporters that his team should have had two penalties. He was wrong about the second one. Klopp, meanwhile, strode the touchline like a chap who had just discovered he had missed the last bus home. Agitated.

Full-time told the whole story, though. As Klopp rallied the Kop with successive pumps of his fist, Guardiola was gesturing to the officials as he started the walk down the players’ tunnel.

Hearing the noise of the crowd, Guardiola looked back over his shoulder and it was hard to understand why.

He has, after all, seen it all before.

 ??  ?? How Sportsmail highlighte­d the dangermen who could decide ththe bibig clashlh iin Saturday’sStd’ paper
How Sportsmail highlighte­d the dangermen who could decide ththe bibig clashlh iin Saturday’sStd’ paper
 ??  ?? Swtich the play: Alexander-Arnold uses his left foot to fire a fine crossfield ball
Swtich the play: Alexander-Arnold uses his left foot to fire a fine crossfield ball
 ??  ?? On the charge: Robertson is released down the left by the pass
On the charge: Robertson is released down the left by the pass
 ??  ??
 ??  ?? Heads we win: the Liverpool forward guides the ball home from the cross with Fernandinh­o helpless
Heads we win: the Liverpool forward guides the ball home from the cross with Fernandinh­o helpless
 ?? SKY SPORTS ?? Pinpoint: his cross is inch-perfect, with Salah (top) shown to be just onside
SKY SPORTS Pinpoint: his cross is inch-perfect, with Salah (top) shown to be just onside
 ??  ?? left by the pass
left by the pass

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom