Daily Mail

You can crush a country but not the people’s spirit

EAT THE BUDDHA by Barbara Demick (Granta £18.99, 272pp)

- IVO DAWNAY

The very word ‘Tibet’ has romantic, resonance. The ‘Roof of the World’ conjures the vast snowy wastes of the high himalayan plateau, populated by yaks, nomadic herders, yetis and Buddhist lamas in russet robes, capable of levitation and clairvoyan­ce.

Alas, there is a very different side to modern-day Tibet, a place of police checkpoint­s, arbitrary arrests and punishment beatings; of a sullen second-class citizenry subdued by a Chinese state equipped with advanced biometric data, facial recognitio­n technology and, it is said, millions of closed-circuit cameras — one for every two citizens.

Tibet, a former empire itself, was incorporat­ed in 1950 into communist China by force majeure as an autonomous region of the People’s Republic. Today it is autonomous in name only.

It is also the world centre for selfimmola­tion — suicide as a political gesture, with the protester dousing themselves with petrol and lighting a match. Since 2009, 159 Tibetans have chosen this excruciati­ngly painful death to demand autonomy for Tibet and the return of revered spiritual leader the Dalai Lama.

Barbara Demick’s eat The Buddha focuses on Ngaba, a small city on the eastern side of the Tibetan plateau where two-thirds of the suicides have taken place. To tell her story, the former Los Angeles Times Beijing correspond­ent homes in on the lives of its ordinary citizens.

By spinning their oral histories into a single narrative, she captures not just the events, but how they affect the daily lives of her protagonis­ts. Woven between is a history of Tibet and its dramatic, tragic story of the past six decades.

She starts in 1958 with Gonpo, a sevenyearo­ld Tibetan aristocrat’s daughter, who returns home to find Chinese troops outside. her parents are sent into exile — and to early deaths. We follow her through to her 60s, first as an enthusiast­ic Communist, through her exile in the Cultural Revolution, her happy marriage to a Chinese man and, finally, her role as an adviser to the Dalai Lama in exile in India.

There is also Tsegyam, an academic radicalise­d by his love of Tibetan history, who becomes the Dalai Lama’s private secretary; and Tsepey, a good-time boy politicise­d by the clampdown after rioting in 2008 who escaped to Shenzhen miles away, was then found and escaped again.

Demick does not dodge uncomforta­ble facts. Several of her subjects start out enthusiast­ic for the materialis­m the

Chinese economic miracle brought. Even today some exiled Tibetans are drifting back, lured by the comfortabl­e life China can provide.

To do so means accepting the daily indignitie­s of Chinese racism, the bureaucrat­ic barriers to Tibetan advancemen­t and Beijing’s demonisati­on of the beloved Dalai Lama. It was these realities that first hardened Tibetan hearts and fostered a dogged resistance which, handled differentl­y, may never have built up.

Time and again one is struck by the gentleness of Tibetan culture — rooted in a Buddhism characteri­sed by non-violence and compassion. (Suicide as rebellion is deemed acceptable as it harms no one but the practition­er. Elsewhere, a prayer is said over a fly, drowned in a bowl of soup.)

Today, there are regrets too over President Xi Jinping’s hardline assimilati­on strategy. His more liberal father was sympatheti­c to the Tibetan cause, Demick writes, and for decades wore a watch given to him by the young Dalai Lama.

This remarkable book offers a unique insight into Tibet’s plight, allowing the reader to understand what it is like for its people to be tossed about in a political storm they neither want nor understand.

Demick’s title references the ravenous Maoist cadres who, during 1934’s Long March, ate the flour and sugar Buddhas made by Tibetans as votive offerings — symbolic of the cultural cataclysm to come.

‘All revolution­s devour their children,’ as the old saying has it. But who was to know, back then, that the next meal on the Chinese revolution­ary menu would be the Tibetan people themselves?

 ??  ?? Serene scene: But Tibet is held in thrall
Serene scene: But Tibet is held in thrall

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom