Daily Mail

Why DO you need diversity training to give a jab?

- By Professor Martin Marshall Professor Marshall is chairman of the Royal College of General Practition­ers

Amid a worsening death toll, soaring infections, and intense pressure on the NHS, the Covid crisis could hardly appear more grim. But as the new year begins, the vaccinatio­n programme provides genuine hope that the disease could be conquered.

This crucial initiative was given a huge boost on Wednesday by the approval of the Oxford-AstraZenec­a vaccine, which is a game- changer because it’s easier to produce, store and distribute than other types.

Based on a potential rate of two million jabs a week once the programme is fully operationa­l, it is possible that no fewer than 30million people could be vaccinated by the summer, providing real immunity across the nation.

However, that uplifting prospect will only be realised if there are sufficient vaccinator­s to deliver the huge number of jabs required. The task is far too big for the NHS workforce, which is struggling to cope with the burden of Covid alongside its other responsibi­lities.

So the programme will have to rely on a large number of volunteers to meet this colossal challenge. The good news is that there is an army of retired medical personnel eager to help, including not just former GPs, but also surgeons, physicians and nurses. indeed, when the Covid pandemic began, more than 40,000 of these experience­d profession­als applied to return to the NHS so they could assist in the response.

The bad news is that there are worrying signs that this precious resource is being hampered by the Government and NHS management, just when it could be utilized to dramatic effect – and the problem appears to be in excessive bureaucrac­y.

instead of welcoming back skilled, dedicated former staff, officialdo­m seems to be smothering the whole recruitmen­t process in dispiritin­g layers of red tape.

Rather than thinking creatively, a boxticking mentality is thwarting would-be NHS returnees, with potentiall­y serious consequenc­es for patients.

Applicants are required to provide at least 21 pieces of documentat­ion to prove they have undertaken training in a range of fields, many of which have nothing to do with the vaccinatio­n programme.

Some checks, of course, are needed. After all, the NHS does not want to hire people who don’t know what they’re doing. in particular, any volunteer vaccinator must be able to react effectivel­y to cases of either a severe allergic reaction or a cardiac arrest.

But some of these bureaucrat­ic demands are ridiculous, such as the requiremen­t to be certified in ‘fire safety’, ‘conflict resolution’, or ‘preventing radicalisa­tion’.

in the midst of the present desperate crisis, it makes little sense to require exmedical profession­als to provide documentar­y evidence that they have undertaken instructio­n in ‘equality, diversity and human rights’ or ‘data security awareness’ in order to deliver vaccinatio­ns. What we need from NHS bosses to ensure the success of the vaccine programme is a sense of urgency.

instead, there is still the fixation with the checklist, as highlighte­d by this standard from NHS Profession­als, the body in charge of human resources, to vaccinator applicants: ‘We have a stringent recruitmen­t process in place in order to recruit a wide array of individual­s from a variety of background­s.’

This is a moment not for the usual laborious stringency, but for dynamic pragmatism, and it is the skills of individual­s that should be the priority here.

i fear that the heavy-handed approach is not just underminin­g the goodwill of applicants, but is acting as a worrying deterrent to badly needed recruitmen­t.

Some retired doctors have already expressed disillusio­n, like dr Brian Cooper from Bromsgrove, who was approved to help in the pandemic in April, but then heard nothing until he was called to an ‘uninformat­ive’ Zoom meeting in November, after which there was silence again. ‘There seems an inability of the NHS to ease its red tape regulation­s,’ he says.

Another potential volunteer complained that after spending two days on his applicatio­n, ‘i am beginning to lose the will to continue’.

it would be a tragedy if all this medical expertise were to be lost. Some argue that the logjam in recruitmen­t reflects a worrying lack of foresight when an efficient voluntary workforce should have been organised months ago.

BuTi actually think a bigger problem is over-planning, where managers envisaged their ideal structure and then stuck rigidly to their recruitmen­t procedures. At present, there are probably just enough vaccinator­s in view of the limited supplies. But all that will change over the next four weeks as the Oxford jab becomes widely available.

As well as the Covid vaccinatio­n programme, GPs have a host of other vital duties, including the expanded flu vaccinatio­n programme, child immunisati­on, and the ‘business as usual’ care, such as support for people with long-term conditions, and chronic illnesses. indeed, the advent of Covid means that GPs’ burdens need to be relieved not expanded.

The Government and NHS has to get the vaccinatio­n programme right – and time is running short. The recruitmen­t of volunteers must be speeded up.

Box-ticking officials might worry about supposed risks, but the real risk is that the disease could continue to rage if there are insufficie­nt vaccinator­s.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom