Daily Mail

MINISTERS MUST ACT NOW TO END THE MISERY

- COMMENTARY by Sir Peter Bottomley Sir Peter is Father of the House of Commons and Conservati­ve MP for Worthing West

HUNDREDS of thousands of leaseholde­rs face ruinous costs if they are forced to pay for the mistakes of others. But why? Two prime ministers, three secretarie­s of state and successive housing ministers stated leaseholde­rs should not pay to make their homes safe.

Now, Parliament must ensure the Government indemnifie­s leaseholde­rs from the costs.

It will take years to allocate blame and costs. The only certainty is that the leaseholde­rs are innocent. Faults were made by regulators, government­s, component manufactur­ers, designers, developers, builders and sales forces.

Listen to the heartbreak­ing testimony by the cladding groups in the North and the Midlands. Hear the evidence by the National Leasehold Campaign.

‘Buy your own home!’ Buy? No. The more accurate descriptio­n is lease-renter. Pay for a lease to own nothing except the possible liability to pay for the actions, decisions and sometimes the greed of others.

In law, a leaseholde­r is the most vulnerable type of tenant.

The social tenant is protected. The private tenant can leave liabilitie­s behind by moving away at the end of the rental period.

AFTER the Grenfell tragedy, many leaseholde­rs consulted the Government- funded Lease advisory service. Some were advised to go the property tribunal for protection against the costs of replacing dangerous cladding systems.

The campaignin­g charity Leasehold Knowledge Partnershi­p knew better. Feudal lease terms, as if carried forward from the time of William the Conqueror, could not protect the vulnerable leaseholde­r.

Nearly three years ago, I warned that instead of waiting for years for an inquiry to reach conclusion­s, the Government should have a round- table meeting in the open with the landlords, the builders and representa­tives of leaseholde­rs.

It is time to settle on simple, effective ways to remove and replace products that still endanger residents in blocks of flats. Make funds available at once so each block is made safe. End the costs of expensive ‘waking watch’ fire patrols. Make homes safe and saleable.

The responsibi­lity for paying should be apportione­d later between those who caused the disaster. The only condition is that the leaseholde­r is recognised as not responsibl­e.

CAN we trust the Prime Minister and ministers to achieve justice? They must stick to their words. Months ago, the National Audit Office stated that the pace of progress lagged behind the ministry’s own expectatio­ns, particular­ly in the private residentia­l sector. That is why it’s so vital that all buildings are now made safe for residents.

No leaseholde­r, lease-renter, should suffer anxiety facing costs well beyond their ability to pay. For there are huge sums involved here: replacing unsafe cladding on buildings may total £15 billion, nearly ten times the funds now available.

Just 202 dangerous buildings have been fixed completely so far, but the Government’s own estimates suggest there could be 11,760 in total.

Until this problem is fixed, people will continue to suffer. Meanwhile, every constituen­cy has flats which have become a frozen part of the housing market.

Both ethically and politicall­y, the Government must act now to fulful its promises.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom