Daily Mail

I can’t see Tuchel winning the big prizes for Chelsea

- @MicahRicha­rds MICAH RICHARDS

THERE was a time when Chelsea changed managers that we would look at each other in the Manchester City dressing room and think: here we go.

Chelsea were the benchmark when I started as a profession­al, they were the standard-setters. From Jose Mourinho to Luiz Felipe Scolari to Carlo Ancelotti, you would look at the new man and begin to wonder what world-class players they would bring with them.

You always knew Chelsea would be a force because they went for the best.

True, it did not always work. But there was always that feeling it would click and the number of trophies they have won in the last 18 years has been incredible.

Had I been in a dressing room this week and saw news break of Thomas Tuchel’s appointmen­t, I would not have had the same sense of anxiety.

Chelsea have appointed Tuchel because they want to win the Premier League and Champions League again. I struggle to see that happening with him.

What have Chelsea seen in Tuchel that convinces them he will outwit Pep Guardiola and Jurgen Klopp over the course of a 38-game season?

I’m glad he was realistic in his opening press conference to say they had no chance of winning the title this year but why should that change in 2022?

First impression­s are very important in football and the one Tuchel made on Wednesday with his team selection against Wolves could not be called positive.

I know he has explained at great length why it was unfair not to pick Mason Mount and Reece James, and pointed out he wanted experience.

This feels like a bit of a cop out. It would suggest the first thing Tuchel knew about Chelsea’s interest in him came after Frank Lampard had been sacked, but it is a nonsense to think he had not watched any of the club’s recent games.

What Tuchel did by not including Mount and James — and let’s not forget Tammy Abraham, who had scored a hat-trick against Luton on Sunday — has put the thought in some people’s minds that Chelsea are going to abandon the faith they had recently shown in young players.

If you are left out of a team because you haven’t been good enough or someone is better than you, it stings but you can deal with it. When you are left out without real explanatio­n, it is hard to stomach. Whatever Tuchel has said to Mount and James in recent days, they will still feel a sting. Mount went through a stage at the beginning of the season when he was labelled ‘teacher’s pet’ because Lampard always played him, but I can assure you, having had the privilege of working with Frank, favouritis­m is not something he ever indulges in.

I played for England with Frank and was at Manchester City for a short while with him, too. He was 36 when he joined us but he was still the last one to come in from training — he wouldn’t stop until he had scored from every angle in the four- station shooting drill we used to do.

His dedication, applicatio­n and willingnes­s to work hard are things he would undoubtedl­y have carried into his new life as a manager. I’m disappoint­ed that it has ended this way for him and I feel sorry for Chelsea’s fans, who had bought into what he was trying to do. Frank lacked experience and that is what has cost him. It looks like the club did not trust in him to turn the situation around and get Chelsea into the top four by the end of the season. But did he not deserve the chance to at least have a shot at it? The moment Chelsea sanctioned an outlay of more than £200million last summer,

I was worried for him. I don’t believe all of the signings were Frank’s but the results were always going to be on his shoulders. He was basically in a no-win situation.

When a club spends that much money, the atmosphere changes. I remember what it was like when City signed Robinho in 2008. All of a sudden you can feel expectatio­n and pressure building.

How you accommodat­e big signings and juggle it all becomes a problem in itself.

Chelsea have a lot of players who are similar — Christian Pulisic, Timo Werner, Kai Havertz, Mateo Kovacic, Jorginho, Mount — and I bet if we all sat down to write our best starting line-up, there would be countless different combinatio­ns. That isn’t a good place for a club to be.

It has been pointed out that Chelsea’s possession improved against Wolves and they made more than 800 passes, but stats like that leave me cold. The main statistics in football are how many you score and concede and the onus is on Tuchel to find the right blend.

I’m absolutely not writing Tuchel off, but something about his appointmen­t doesn’t feel right. If you look at Klopp, for example, you could see Liverpool had a plan and were ready to see it through.

If Tuchel’s plan for Chelsea doesn’t work, it will be the same old story and another one will bite the dust.

 ?? GETTY IMAGES ?? Unconvinci­ng start: new Chelsea boss Thomas Tuchel
GETTY IMAGES Unconvinci­ng start: new Chelsea boss Thomas Tuchel
 ?? GETTY IMAGES ?? Dropped: Mason Mount
GETTY IMAGES Dropped: Mason Mount
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom