Daily Mail

BRIDGE MASTERCLAS­S

- PETER DONOVAN

I part writer’s souths out. topic opponents; you It’s Pre-emptive saw very have I of than think this in only important a a a double- weak his Pairs hand this they comment subsequent bids would hand event also in for dummy are another a with alert on have opened partnershi­p used the analysis at play partner been bridge least bidding primarily 3 ♠ problem. a which a of more to to column, seven-card play! was agree the to was interestin­g that fact obstruct The just passed as most suit. that how ‘strong’ the when number The responding strength to of this raise factors; weakness to of partner game, your your pre-empts position is if will he going have has at to a difficulty is the goodish be, determined table, for otherwise, in hand. the judging state by a of even the vulnerabil­ity, rule your of opponents. 300 and your 500, agreed The signifying general style that principle with you partner, should is to and use not be vulnerable more than respective­ly. two down doubled, This assumes non-vulnerable that and the opponents is therefore are worthwhile. going to make game, and your sacrifice

south is in the ideal position for his pre-empt — dealer, with maximum strength and non-vulnerable, against vulnerable opponents. In Pairs competitio­n, it would certainly be worth considerin­g a pre-empt of 4 ♠ , instead of 3 ♠ ; if partner has the right values, you’ll make game. If the opponents have the points, you’ve made it that much more difficult for them to find their best contract. sacrificin­g against a game in this situation you can actually afford to go three down doubled, and still gain.

 ?? ??
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom