Daily Mail

Dangers of not getting every last drop from your drip

Up to a third of medicine could be left in the tube if the IV line is removed too soon

- By RACHEL ELLIS

Ensuring sick patients receive the full dose of the medication they have been prescribed may sound like a basic prerequisi­te of medical care. Yet underdosin­g — as it is medically known — is a significan­t problem in the NHS that could be putting patients at risk, according to some experts.

it can occur when hospital patients are given drugs intravenou­sly.

Once the bag of solution has emptied, it is removed along with the tube through which the liquid is infused into the patient, and both are thrown away.

But, inevitably, some liquid containing the medication will remain inside the tube, especially when the IV kit (or set, as it is also known) relies on gravity — without liquid in the bag, there is nothing to push the remainder in the tube into the patient.

under guidelines, doctors and nurses are meant to ‘flush’ the tube with saline so the patient doesn’t miss out on the residual dose. This should be done for all intravenou­s (IV) drugs, including antibiotic­s and painkiller­s (but is not necessary for hydration fluids).

To flush the line once an IV infusion has finished, a new small bag of saline (50100ml) should be attached to the drip and the infusion started again, to push any residual medication into the patient.

The national infusion and Vascular Access society (NIVAS), which represents healthcare workers involved in the administra­tion of IV drugs and vascular access, issued the new guidance in February 2021 after two studies last year suggested up to a third of the dose of medication could be lost if the line is not flushed.

While line-flushing is standard practice in cancer care and paediatric­s, on other wards ‘it is rarely done’, according to rachel Dixon, an enteral nurse specialist and a former NHS infusion manager, who has brought the largely unrecognis­ed issue of underdosin­g to the attention of NHS England.

‘The view seems to be that when the IV bag has emptied, the full dose has been given. But that isn’t the case,’ she says. ‘A proportion of it will still be in the tube and, if this is not flushed, the patient won’t get the full dose.

‘We should be giving drugs as prescribed, not as we fancy; we should be throwing away saline, not medication. This bad practice is a country-wide problem.’

A 2018 study across six department­s in a large UK teaching hospital found that overall, 74 per cent of IV sets were not flushed over the course of a week. This rose to 99 per cent on surgical wards, 80 per cent on critical care and high-dependency units, and 89 per cent on the emergency admission unit.

none of the IV sets containing painkiller­s and antibiotic­s was flushed — and ‘almost one third’ had antibiotic­s still in them, with up to 21 per cent of the dose being thrown out, said the researcher­s.

Oncology was the only department where all IV sets were flushed, according to the study in the British Journal of nursing.

ANOTHER UK study, published in the journal JAC — Antimicrob­ial resistance in August last year, estimated up to 33 per cent of antibiotic­s may be lost; while a u.s. study, published in the Journal of infusion nursing also last year, found it was 35 per cent.

The potential impact of underdosin­g is far-reaching. ‘if patients don’t receive the prescribed dose of medication, it may impact on their recovery times, which means a longer, more costly stay in hospital,’ says rachel Dixon, pointing to reports of underdosin­g being a cause of treatment failure in patients with malaria.

In its guidance, NIVAS admits that ‘flushing IV infusion sets in adult patients is rare’. Between 20ml and 30ml of drug solution may be lost, it says, which could be ‘half the dose of a 50ml bag’, adds rachel.

Under the new guidelines, medical staff are advised to flush the lines and use a new IV set for each different drug.

In 2017, NHS England issued a Patient safety Alert warning that a patient’s IV line should be flushed or removed at the end of each surgical procedure to prevent any residual anaestheti­c or sedative drugs being inadverten­tly given to the same patient later, causing ‘muscle paralysis, unconsciou­sness and respirator­y and cardiac failure’.

Between 2014 and 2017, 58 such incidents were reported.

In one case, a young woman, known only as Kathryn, was temporaril­y paralysed and went into respirator­y arrest after residual anaestheti­c drugs — given to her during an operation to remove her appendix in 2015 — were not flushed from the cannula before antibiotic­s were put through the same tube a few hours later.

‘When the nurse administer­ed antibiotic­s, this flushed the paralysing agent into me,’ she said later. ‘i felt this rush go through my body and everything started to seize up. it really panicked me and i could feel the air coming out of my lungs. i was conscious but completely paralysed — i couldn’t open my eyes or communicat­e.

‘Within an hour the anaestheti­st who had made the error came and sat by my bedside,’ she said. ‘He was devastated. it was a very costly mistake for both of us.’

Kathryn was later diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder.

According to Andrew Barton, chair of NIVAS and editor of the guidelines, improvemen­ts in the design of IV kit mean the residual volume is likely to be much less than the recent studies suggest — even less than 5 per cent, he says.

reflecting on the problem, he told good Health: ‘unfortunat­ely, for some reason it had become common practice over the past 20 years to discard IV sets from the general adult population without flushing the line which may contain residual medication. no one was aware this was happening.

‘We know line-flushing does occur in high-risk areas such as cancer, critical care and paediatric­s, for example. it is now down to hospitals to assess other wards and change practice accordingl­y.’

FlusHing Iv sets has time and cost implicatio­ns (because hospitals would need additional bags of saline), and may carry a risk of overloadin­g the patient with fluid (though this can be prevented by using the right amount of saline).

in addition, disconnect­ing and restarting an IV device to administer the ‘washout’ saline can increase the risk of infection.

some believe this may be less of an issue with antibiotic­s. For the 245,000 people diagnosed with sepsis each year in the UK, IV antibiotic­s are key to recovery.

Dr ron Daniels, head of the UK sepsis Trust, says: ‘some patients may miss out on 5 to 10 per cent of their dose of drugs if no line-flushing takes place, which is technicall­y illegal as it is a prescribed medication,’ he says.

‘We support the use of safe, effective line-flushing. However, antibiotic doses are very general, so losing 5 or 10 per cent probably won’t transform patient care.’

Andrew Barton agrees: ‘When a patient is on IV antibiotic­s we take blood to check how they are responding to antibiotic­s and adjust the dose accordingl­y.

‘We need to do more research into this issue, but i am confident this is not a massive scandal.’

But rachel Dixon insists action is needed to stamp out the practice: ‘Oncology and paediatric­s get it, but it seems to be a blind spot for other department­s.

‘We need the same consistent approach across all of the NHS so that patients receive the dose of medication they were prescribed. Otherwise some people will change their ways, but others won’t.’

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom