Daily Mail

Cladding tax to raise £2bn over decade

Sunak targets major developers’ profits

- By John Stevens and Miles Dilworth

RISHI Sunak will slap a new tax on the big housebuild­ers to help fix the cladding scandal in next week’s Budget.

The Chancellor will target the developers to recoup around £2billion of the cost of removing the dangerous materials from high-rise buildings.

He will announce that the levy on the profits of the most lucrative firms will come into force from next year.

It is a victory for the Daily Mail, which has led the way in calling on ministers to repair unsafe homes.

This newspaper’s End The Cladding Scandal campaign has demanded that the firms responsibl­e for the crisis should be made to pay their fair share.

The Residentia­l Property Developer Tax will be imposed on UK housebuild­ers that make profits of more than £25million a year.

It is understood the levy will be set by Mr Sunak at between 3 and 5 per cent on profits above this threshold.

It is expected to raise around £200million a year – which would amount to £2billion over the ten years it is due to be in place – clawing back some of the cost to taxpayers of fixing the problem.

Mr Sunak wants the firms to cough up as redress for building hundreds of thousands of flats and homes with unsafe cladding. He believes they will benefit from confidence being restored in the housing market.

Ministers have pledged £5.1billion to help end the safety crisis in the wake of the Grenfell Tower fire in west London, which killed 72 people in June 2017. Hundreds of thousands of flat owners have faced the threat of bills of up to £150,000 each because their homes are wrapped in unsafe cladding.

The Government announced earlier this year that it will fund the cost of replacing unsafe cladding for leaseholde­rs in England in residentia­l blocks that are at least 18 metres high, which is six storeys.

Those in low and medium-rise blocks will pay a maximum of £50 a month for ‘long-term, low-interest’ loan to help them replace their cladding.

The country’s biggest housebuild­ers make significan­tly more than £25million a year, with Persimmon, Berkeley, Taylor Wimpey and Barratt Homes reporting pretax profits of £784million, £504million, £492million and £264million respective­ly last year.

In February, Barratt chief David Thomas said the company would ‘support a fair, prospectiv­e levy as part of any way of easing the burden on homeowners without threatenin­g the future supply of much-needed new homes’.

John Tutte, chairman of Redrow, said a levy raising around £200million a year would not be ‘a massive amount’ for the industry to pay.

Emma Byrne, from the End Our Cladding Scandal campaign, last night suggested the developers should face a more punitive tax.

She said: ‘£2billion over ten years is a drop in the ocean for them. They can easily afford to pay many multiples of this risible amount – it is a simple point of fairness that the Government forces them to fix the mess they have created.

‘Many of those caught up in this scandal bought homes that should never have passed building regulation­s in the first place – yet it is they who stand to be bankrupted to make their homes safe.

‘Since the Grenfell Tower tragedy, seven developers have recorded combined profits of more than £15billion and ten executives have personally received a mindboggli­ng £708million.’

The tax on developers will be announced by Mr Sunak in his Budget on Wednesday. The Treasury declined to comment.

IF a car – or even a kettle – had a design defect, the manufactur­er would be obliged to mend it for free.

So it’s scandalous that greedy building companies have shirked responsibi­lity for repairing potential fire-trap homes.

But in a victory for the Mail, ministers will force these sharks to pay £2billion in tax to fix dangerous cladding that has trapped blameless leaseholde­rs in a living hell.

even so, this is a pittance compared to the total bill – and the vast taxpayer-backed profits the firms have pocketed.

For destroying homebuyers’ dreams, developers should be told to stump up the lot – not allowed to wriggle off the hook.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom