Daily Mail

Charity STILL trying to ‘guilt trip’ mums into natural births

Despite obsession blamed for unnecessar­y deaths...

- By Tom Kelly and Miles Dilworth

Britain’s biggest childbirth charity has continued to ‘guilttrip’ women into natural births despite the obsession being blamed for unnecessar­y deaths, the Daily Mail can reveal.

the national Childbirth trust (nCt) also deleted articles proclaimin­g ‘natural’ labour left mothers more ‘satisfied’ days before the Ockenden report into the biggest maternity scandal in nHs history.

the nCt, which received over £1million from government grants and contracts last year, runs fee-paying antenatal courses for more than 90,000 mostly middle-class parents-to-be every year.

For many first-time mothers, these classes are a key source of informatio­n. But women who recently attended courses said some teachers remained fixated with natural births and made them feel any interventi­on, even taking paracetamo­l, was shameful.

Others said the nCt made them feel they had ‘failed’ because they had lifesaving caesarean, with one told by a teacher to ‘mourn’ her emergency C-section. the nCt was a driving force against what it saw as the over-medicalisa­tion of labour.

Last month the Ockenden report found the avoidable deaths of 201 babies and nine mothers at shrewsbury and telford nHs trust were in part due to women being refused a caesarean.

Following the report, the nCt said it had changed its policy in 2019 so that it no longer promoted ‘one way over another’ for childbirth.

But rebecca Matthews, an education lecturer who is completing a PhD on birth trauma, said mothers who went to nCt courses last year said they were encouraged to avoid induction and interventi­ons as they would lead to a ‘cascade of interventi­ons’, and were not prepared for the risks of vaginal birth. she added: ‘the nCt is a multimilli­on pound charity which does some excellent work, but they are actively promoting – along with many other antenatal organisati­ons – vaginal childbirth without interventi­on as risk-free and stigmatisi­ng all other modes of birth.’

Clarabella Gray, of the infant Feeding alliance campaign, attended the nCt antenatal course in 2019 and took a refresher in 2021.

she said: ‘it concerns me that mothers are potentiall­y being left with some form of psychologi­cal or physical trauma due to their birth experience­s being hugely mismatched from the rhetoric of influentia­l organisati­ons, such as the nCt.’

On Mumsnet, a woman claimed her nCt teacher told her group: ‘if a doctor as much as looks into your labour room, that will be enough to disrupt your hormones and for labour to stall.’

the charity had articles on its website until at least March 6 saying: ‘You are more likely to feel satisfied with spontaneou­s vaginal delivery than if you have your labour induced or accelerate­d...’

One linked to what it called the royal College of Midwives’ (rCM) ‘campaign for normal birth’ website. the rCM dropped this campaign in 2017, acknowledg­ing it could have been ‘misleading’.

since 2017 the nCt has secured around £2.5million from government contracts and £1.1million from grants.

an nCt spokesman said: ‘We are not here to promote one way over another, but to ensure parents have access to evidence-based informatio­n and a network of peer and specialist support.’ she said antenatal course content was ‘extensivel­y reviewed and refreshed’ in 2019 and should now cover all birth methods.

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom