Daily Mail

Why it would be ludicrous for FA to ban Richarliso­n

-

FOR a start, they are not flares. Everton may be living in fear that Richarliso­n could receive an FA ban at the worst possible time, for his celebratio­ns during the win over Chelsea, but that would be a ludicrous over-reaction. Richarliso­n did not throw a flare into the crowd because flares are lit and have heat. They could cause a burn, a genuine injury. Richarliso­n would have to be daft to pick up a flare with his bare hand. It might as well be a firework. What he threw was a coloured smoke canister. They are popular at football grounds right now and can be purchased on Amazon for a tenner. ‘Ideal for parties, weddings, birthdays,’ it says. One came on when Richarliso­n scored, so he cheerfully chucked it back. Not a flare; a harmless cylinder emitting blue smoke. It’s still not smart. But one landed near him when Everton scored against Leicester, too, and he just looked at it with a wry smile. This suggests a lesson has been learned. He won’t do it again. And what he did in the first place wasn’t so terrible. It’s a warning, a word; nothing more.

 ?? GETTY IMAGES ?? Passion play: Richarliso­n gets caught up in the moment
GETTY IMAGES Passion play: Richarliso­n gets caught up in the moment

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom