Daily Mail

BOGOF ban scrapped to tackle rising cost of living

- By Harriet Line Chief Political Correspond­ent

THE ban on ‘buy one, get one free’ (BOGOF) deals for unhealthy foods has been delayed by a year to help families struggling with the cost of living crisis.

Plans to introduce a 9pm watershed for junk food advertisin­g have also been postponed and could be ditched altogether pending a consultati­on.

But the U-turn was quickly condemned by health campaigner­s and obesity experts who accused Boris Johnson of ‘playing politics’ with children’s health.

The Prime Minister announced a crackdown on Britain’s bulging waistlines in 2020 after his battle with coronaviru­s which he admitted was exacerbate­d by being overweight.

But he has since acknowledg­ed that the policy had ‘nanny state’ overtones and has come under pressure from ministers to ditch it in light of the cost of living crisis.

The curbs on BOGOF and three-for-two deals on unhealthy food – as well as restrictio­ns on free refills for soft drinks – were due to come into force in October.

Under the plans, junk food giants were also to be banned from advertisin­g online and on TV before 9pm from January next year.

But the Department for Health last night announced that it would delay the plans to allow ministers to ‘review and monitor’ the impact of the restrictio­ns on the cost of living.

However, rules banning unhealthy foods from being promoted in key areas of shops, like checkouts and aisle ends, will still come into force that month.

Public health minister Maggie Throup said: ‘We’re committed to doing everything we can to help people live healthier lives. Pausing restrictio­ns on deals like “buy one get one free” will allow us to understand its impact on consumers in light of an unpreceden­ted global economic situation.’

The announceme­nt was welcomed by the Food and Drink Federation, which said it would give them more time to prepare for the change in law.

Kate Halliwell, the body’s chief scientific officer, said: ‘At a time when both families and our manufactur­ers are struggling with high inflation, it makes sense to delay the restrictio­ns on volume promotions as it risked further stretching already pressed household budgets.’

However, the move was heavily criticised by obesity experts last night. Professor Rachel Batterham, from University College London, said the U-turn was ‘incredibly disappoint­ing’.

She added: ‘Many have cited the cost of living crisis as a reason to keep buy one get one free deals but research is clear – they do not save us money, they simply encourage us to spend more of it.

‘Delaying the 9pm watershed for advertisin­g unhealthy foods will leave our children vulnerable to developing long-term unhealthy eating habits.’

Caroline Cerny, from the Obesity Health Alliance, said: ‘This is a shocking Uturn by the Government that will have severe ramificati­ons for children’s health and fatally undermine any further efforts to address health disparitie­s.

‘Child obesity is at a devastatin­g all-time high and research shows restrictin­g junk food adverts on TV alone would significan­tly reduce the number of children with excess weight.’

Michelle Mitchell, chief executive of Cancer Research UK, added: ‘These measures would help create a healthier food environmen­t and reduce obesity – the second biggest preventabl­e cause of cancer. Claims that these delays will help address the cost of living crisis are grossly misleading.’

Urging the Government to reconsider its decision, she added: ‘These marketing pressures add up – both financiall­y and in terms of weight gain.’

Barbara Crowther, of the Children’s Food Campaign, said that the delay could threaten the UK’s target to halve childhood obesity by 2030. She added: ‘Boris is playing politics with our children’s health.’

‘Playing politics with health’

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom