Daily Mail

What a perfectly imperfect rascal!

Louis’s Jubilee high jinks left some tutting. But BEL MOONEY says it was a joyous relief to see scenes EVERY mother will recognise ...

- By Bel Mooney

HOW many times have you seen it happen? There you all are, at a wedding or some other important family occasion, and a small child kicks off. Oh dear. Grandad has just started his heartfelt speech at the Golden Wedding, Granny looks emotional, handkerchi­efs are out — and suddenly a bored four-year-old yells: ‘Noooo! Don’t want to!’

No efforts to shush the child’s squawks can possibly work. What real live four-year-old takes any notice when he or she just wants to throw off the posh clothes and play? So then you witness the tense faces of

the embarrasse­d parents as one or other finally scoops up the protesting offspring and heads for the door — or else hands over an iPad or phone to distract the little one.

If you’re a curmudgeon (and there’s plenty about) you probably think: ‘What a brat!’ But if you’re a parent or grandparen­t you’ll sympathise and murmur: ‘Oh, poor things . . .’ Because we’ve all been there. That’s why I was so delighted by the picture of Prince Louis sticking out his tongue at his mother, then cheekily reaching to put a hand over her mouth when (clearly) she must have told him to behave.

On seeing the image, my daughter Kitty, who has a girl aged nine and a boy of six, commented with real feeling: ‘Every mother knows that moment when your child

forces you to inhale the scent of grubby little boy’s hand — eau de

dirt! Watching it must have made the nation’s mothers breathe a sigh of relief.’

Yes, we all like to have the truth confirmed — that other people’s children and grandchild­ren can, at times, be just as trying as our own. Even the royals.

It’s so revealing that the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge yesterday released their own delighted message about the festivitie­s: ‘What a fantastic weekend of celebratio­ns. Seeing people across the nation coming together with family, friends and loved ones has been extremely special.

‘Thank you to everyone who turned out to show their gratitude to the Queen and her inspiring 70 years of leadership. From the crowds on The Mall to communitie­s hosting street parties up and down the country, we hope you had a weekend to remember.

‘We all had an incredible time, especially Louis . . .’

They are well aware Louis stole the show. And I bet he wore out his mother. No wonder a popular meme (that’s an image, often doctored, spread on social media) going the rounds is of Kate downing an exaggerate­dly enormous glass of wine.

She probably needed several. Coping with three children isn’t easy at the best of times, but for so long and in public? Knowing the eyes of the world are on you?

For her, there’s no option to swoop her brood away or keep them quiet with a digital device. Personally, as well as a glass of the

finest champagne, I would give her a parenting medal — for displaying non-stop fortitude under fire... even if she did have a little help from extended family.

How I loved the sight of jolly Uncle Mike Tindall intervenin­g from behind with a jokey: ‘I’m watching you.’ (Don’t mess with the big rugger player, Louis.)

AND just like Prince Charles, I’ve been the grandparen­t who tries to help matters by pulling a child for a cuddle on your welcoming lap — only to find the fidgety little darling soon gets restless and wants to escape your loving clutches. Kids, eh?

Still, how many times must Kate have glanced over to her husband with a mute plea: ‘Can’t you have Louis down your end for a bit?’

Meanwhile, the boy in question frowned and wriggled and gurned and then (like the sun after a shower) smiled with delight as a particular­ly mad, colourful puppet went by. In those moments he was

no longer a privileged Prince, he was Everyboy.

It occurred to me that this family seem, all in all, pretty ordinary. Parents who have raised three children will have recognised familiar roles being played out.

There’s the serious, oldest child, trying his best to look as if he’s in charge — but wishing he didn’t have to be. Then the confident middle child — sweetly bossy and

at ease with the family and the world. Finally, there’s the baby who can sometimes, if not always, get away with murder.

Child psychologi­sts have seen significan­ce in birth order. The first

child is thought to be conscienti­ous and cautious, the second more social and independen­t, while the last born can be more attention-seeking, possibly manipulati­ve, with a great sense of mischievou­s fun, but easily bored.

These difference­s can (it’s thought) have a profound effect well into later life.

With the first child parents are so anxious and want to do everything perfectly, but by the time a third one comes along you’re far more relaxed and unbothered about details that would have sent you into a flat spin years earlier.

Perfection, you realise, is simply not achievable. And that is what all those candid pictures of Louis and his older siblings have shown.

No matter how impossibly elegant the Duchess looks and how perfectly she carries out her demanding public role, in the end she is just another mum whose youngest son gives her a shove and kicks his sister.

That’s why I feel so grateful the couple chose to share their children with us over the magical days of the Queen’s Platinum Jubilee. How right that they didn’t hide them away — when to have done so would have made their lives much easier.

I love all the pictures. Charlotte trying to stop her over-enthusiast­ic little brother from waving too much in the carriage; George screwing up his face with the effort of staying silent and dignified.

Charlotte looking like any happy little girl as she mixed up a cake; George being poked in the ear by his sister’s flag.

And of course, Louis covering his ears as the planes roared overhead

— then pulling his whole face down

in a clownish expression of utter boredom. No wonder Kate laughed at his Frankie Howerd look.

Over the joyous four-day Jubilee we were able to observe a real family at play — but at work, too, since they were also enacting a public role which those three children cannot yet possibly understand.

George, Charlotte and Louis have a destiny — and sadly a part of that is to face criticism. I can’t be the only one to be utterly shocked at the kind of criticism levelled at little Louis on social media — yes, at a four-yearold who played up a little bit, as all children will.

Whatever you think about the monarchy, to target children is entirely unacceptab­le. To repeat the comments would be demeaning; it is enough to mention that a few meanminded people opined that the little boy needed more discipline (like what? A cane?) and that his mother is being given the kind of free pass as a parent which would never be given to the Duchess of Sussex.

Oh, for pity’s sake, let us leave the Sussexes out of the equation — which is, after all, what they most wanted and have chosen.

I know I’m in the majority when I say that witnessing the way the three Cambridge children coped with their public role at such a young age made me very proud of them and the way they are being raised.

Those three waving as the carriage bowled through streets thronged with wellwisher­s were being shown by the Royal Family (for nothing happens without discussion and the Queen’s permission) to be an essential part of the whole — that whole being the monarchy that we treasure.

It intrigues me that many people celebrate the Queen as an individual, as if she can be divided from the institutio­n into which she was born and which has sustained her throughout a long life of duty.

The Queen and the monarchy are indivisibl­e, and that is why that last, moving balcony appearance was so significan­t. You can’t truly celebrate Her Majesty without understand­ing the significan­ce of the succession, which means so much to her and the nation.

During the Trooping the Colour ceremony, it moved me to hear my son-in-law explain to his daughter: ‘That one will be the next king, and his son will be the king after that, and that little boy — he’s Prince George — will be king after that.’

That is why I believe it was so important that William and Kate ‘shared’ their family with us.

We could see the children had a jolly time, but also how much — in all their sweet and joyful responses and antics — they were just like children everywhere. Which means deeply loved.

 ?? ?? Family fun: Infectious joy from a happy, loved little boy and his beaming and rightly proud mum
Family fun: Infectious joy from a happy, loved little boy and his beaming and rightly proud mum
 ?? ?? ...and thumbs his nose at Mum when she asks him to behave
...and thumbs his nose at Mum when she asks him to behave
 ?? ?? No waving, Louis! The Prince at Trooping the Colour
No waving, Louis! The Prince at Trooping the Colour
 ?? ?? ...then he pokes his tongue out at Sunday’s pageant
...then he pokes his tongue out at Sunday’s pageant
 ?? ?? Don’t tell me off, Mummy: Cheeky Louis puts his hand over Kate’s mouth and gives her a stern look
Don’t tell me off, Mummy: Cheeky Louis puts his hand over Kate’s mouth and gives her a stern look
 ?? ?? V for Victory: Louis waves his arms in delight watching the brilliant Jubilee pageant
V for Victory: Louis waves his arms in delight watching the brilliant Jubilee pageant
 ?? ?? Plane crazy: He pulls a funny face watching the Jubilee flypast with Charlotte
Plane crazy: He pulls a funny face watching the Jubilee flypast with Charlotte
 ?? ?? . . . then, realising he’s gone too far, it’s time to kiss and make up
. . . then, realising he’s gone too far, it’s time to kiss and make up

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom