Daily Mail

Are these Britain’s most sexist surgeons?

From crude sexual remarks to crass misogyny, our dossier of offensive comments made to mesh surgery victims by their specialist­s begs the question . . .

- By JOHN NAISH

Carole Davies and her partner, Malcolm, looked at each other in shocked silent horror as her surgeon spoke to them. Be warned, his comments were deeply offensive and you may not wish to read them. Carole, 76, a mother of one from stevenage, Hertfordsh­ire, had endured weeks of agony after an NHs surgeon had inserted a polypropyl­ene mesh implant to treat a slight incontinen­ce problem. The mesh was meant to act as a scaffold to support her leaking bladder.

Carole, then 60 and a recently retired personnel administra­tor, had returned to see the surgeon with her partner seven weeks after the surgery. she was in tears as she explained her debilitati­ng pain.

‘i told the surgeon that i could feel the mesh cutting into me, which was agonising,’ Carole told Good Health.

‘But he ignored this and said everything was oK. He told me: “i just don’t understand how you could be in pain. i will refer you to a psychiatri­st.” Then he turned to Malcolm and said: “i’ve made her nice and tight for you.” ’

it was lewd and inappropri­ate but, as we can reveal, is shockingly by no means an isolated example — an insult, literally, not just to Carole but for many others, among the tens of thousands of British women who have suffered agonising complicati­ons from mesh-tape operations since they were first introduced in the late 1990s to treat incontinen­ce or prolapse.

To add insult to injury, these women often struggled for years to have their complaints taken seriously, while surgeons dismissed the idea that there was anything wrong.

after the Mail joined forces with campaignin­g group sling The Mesh to highlight the issue, the Government set up an inquiry, led by Baroness Cumberlege, in July 2018.

This led initially to a pause in the use of surgical mesh for the treatment of urinary incontinen­ce. The inquiry has since called for this pause to be extended until strict requiremen­ts on safety and recompense are met.

Neverthele­ss, an investigat­ion by Good Health last month found that not only is mesh still being surgically implanted in women, but also that its use could well be on the rise again.

Meanwhile, what is now emerging is a fuller, shocking picture of the way many women affected are treated by the medics in whom they have placed their trust — and

LAST continue to be so.

month Good Health published its latest of a long series of features campaignin­g for real justice for Britain’s mesh victims.

We mentioned how one meshinjure­d women, Kelly Cook, had been verbally slapped down by her surgeon after complainin­g of severe pain.

Kelly recalled: ‘ When i told the surgeon about my pains some weeks after the op, he dismissed it and insisted he’d done lots of these operations in the past and nothing had gone wrong.’

Kelly’s story prompted women across the country to share how they, too, had been similarly humiliated at a time when they just wanted help.

sling The Mesh received dozens of messages from women detailing similarly appalling responses, the majority in the past five years, that surgeons had made to deny, belittle and denigrate their agonising pain, emotional trauma and — in some cases — ruined sex lives.

one woman told how her surgeon laughed and said: ‘i don’t understand why you have all this pain. anatomical­ly, you look beautiful.’ another’s consultant said: ‘oh it’s you again. i told you before, it’s not the mesh. You must be lonely or looking for attention.’

in yet another case, the surgeon told his patient not to believe media reports about mesh and insisted: ‘after all, i am the trained consultant.’

While many of these stories are about male clinicians, several respondent­s also reported being snubbed by female consultant­s who refused to take them seriously.

Carole’s problems began after she was referred by her GP to the lister Hospital in stevenage in 2006 when she developed what she describes ‘a slight leak’.

‘i got pushed through the system and ended up seeing a surgeon who said there was a very good thing on the market that he called a tape sling and convinced me it was the right thing to have,’ she says.

‘i was taken in by his charm, so i also agreed to his suggestion that at the same time as the mesh op, he would “whip out” my uterus.

‘He said: “after all, you’re not going to have any more children.”

‘There was no clinical need for this, i now realise.’

When she awoke from the op in the middle of the night, she was in extreme pain.

‘When the nurses came in the morning to remove the gauze over the wound, they were shocked at the state of me. The sheets and my lower half were covered in blood,’ she says.

Carole was sent home after a couple of days, even though she was in terrible pain and had a high temperatur­e. it didn’t resolve, so within a week Malcolm took her back to hospital, where she was admitted for a severe infection and antibiotic treatment.

‘When i went for a follow-up check with the surgeon a few weeks later he flatly denied that i ever had a post-operative infection.

‘i was crying because he had assured me i would be back to normal by then, but i was in agony,’ says Carole. ‘Malcolm could not come near me sexually. We had previously had a very active and enjoyable sex life. Now the pain and debilitati­on from the mesh meant we had no sex life and i can no longer orgasm.’

That is when the surgeon shockingly accused Carole of having psychiatri­c problems and made his crude remarks.

‘ We were gobsmacked,’ says Carole. ‘We couldn’t believe what we were hearing. We looked at each other and didn’t say anything.’

Carole says she complained to the hospital about the surgeon’s comment.

‘We were given an advocate to help represent us at a meeting where the surgeon denied he had said any such things to us, or that he had ever assured me in the first place that i would be entirely back to normal after the op.

‘He even said in the meeting that i didn’t need to orgasm to enjoy sex,’ she says.

‘Nothing came from the meeting and i did not pursue my complaint any further. i didn’t even get an apology.’

and Carole’s problems were far from over. in 2010 and again in 2012, she underwent further procedures — performed by different surgeons from the one she complained about — to remove fragments of the mesh.

Neither worked, and it was only in 2019 — 12 years after the initial operation — that she finally got a consultati­on with the surgeon who has been leading efforts in the UK to ensure women in pain can have their mesh removed: sohier elneil, who is a consultant urogynaeco­logist at University College london Hospitals Trust.

Carole recalls: ‘she said i was so damaged that the mesh needed to be taken out — it was eroding tissue around my urethra [the tube that takes urine from the bladder out of the body].’

But such was the scale of the damage it took two operations to remove all the mesh — one in 2019 to remove it from her vaginal area and a second in May 2022 (delayed because of the pandemic) to extract it from her abdomen.

‘i’m still recovering from the second op but it has made a hell of an improvemen­t already,’ Carole says, happily. ‘i no longer suffer a cutting feeling when i bend over. Miss elneil also performed a colposuspe­nsion, using stitches to support the neck of the bladder so that it can’t move about and cause incontinen­ce.

‘it’s brilliant. i wish i’d had this op in the first place instead of ever having mesh.’

Good Health shared the full dossier of surgeons’ disgracefu­l comments with Baroness Cumberlege. she says: ‘ These stories are deeply disturbing. i am sad to say i am not surprised. We heard shocking experience­s just like these from many, many women during our review. Until we heard

them telling us what they had to go through, I would have found it hard to believe that doctors could display such callous, dismissive and uncaring behaviour. But hundreds, indeed thousands, of women have been submitted to this gaslightin­g.

‘It is unacceptab­le, it breaches trust and it has no place in profession­al medical practice. Women who have suffered these horrific mesh injuries need help and support; instead, in too many instances, they have been brushed aside by the very people responsibl­e for their treatment.’

Kath Sansom, a mesh victim who set up the Sling The Mesh campaign, told Good Health that the problem is continuing.

‘Despite all of the campaignin­g, media coverage and knowledge of mesh issues, sadly, women being seen now are still spoken to in dismissive ways. Especially around loss of sex life,’ she says.

A spokesman for the Royal College of Surgeons of England said in response: ‘We are appalled to read these sexist, highly inappropri­ate comments.

‘Our core standards document for surgeons, Good Surgical Practice, makes it clear patients should be treated with dignity, respect and compassion, and surgeons must always act in a way that builds and maintains trust.

‘This is particular­ly pertinent in respect of this group of patients, who suffered harm as a result of previous treatment and were seeking help and support.

‘We are committed to developing an inclusive and respectful culture across the surgical profession, and these reports make it clear that there are pockets of the profession who need to change their behaviour.’

Dr Swati Jha, a consultant gynaecolog­ist and spokesman for the Royal College of Obstetrici­ans and Gynaecolog­ists, told Good Health: ‘It’s very alarming to hear how health profession­als have spoken to women experienci­ng complicati­ons with mesh. Many of these comments are deeply personal, misogynist­ic and, in some cases, belittle an individual’s experience of pain.

‘We hope the people making these comments are in the minority and the majority of healthcare profession­als do not speak to women in this way.’

Dr Jha adds: ‘We understand the devastatin­g consequenc­es mesh implants have had on the lives of many women in the UK. It is vital healthcare profession­als are sensitive and listen to women’s experience­s, as well as creating a safe space so women feel comfortabl­e sharing any concerns.’

Good Health approached the hospital where Carole was initially treated. Dr Michael Chilvers, medical director for East and North Hertfordsh­ire NHS Trust, which runs the Lister Hospital, told Good Health: ‘We are sorry to hear that Ms Davies continued to be in pain following her vaginal mesh procedure in 2007.

‘Following nationally reported issues and amended guidance in July 2018, along with other NHS trusts, we no longer offer this procedure to treat female stress urinary incontinen­ce or vaginal prolapse.

‘The trust received a complaint in 2009 about the care Carole received. This was thoroughly investigat­ed and was closed in early 2010. We have no record in the complaint of the inappropri­ate comments referenced in this feature.’

 ?? ??
 ?? ?? Shocked: Carole’s surgeon made offensive remarks
Shocked: Carole’s surgeon made offensive remarks
 ?? Picture: DUKE MEDICINE PHOTOGRAPH­Y ??
Picture: DUKE MEDICINE PHOTOGRAPH­Y

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom