Daily Mail

Why is LV still quibbling over crash that killed both my parents?

-

Dear Sally

EARLIER this year both my parents were killed in a horrific car crash. I have viewed both post-mortem examinatio­ns and spoken with the police.

It was made clear the oncoming driver was at fault and the police have stated that, in their eyes, my mother, who was driving my father’s car at the time, was blameless.

My parents were insured with LV= on the same policy for both of their cars. They had each paid an additional premium of £16 for extended personal accident cover of £100,000 each.

We have been informed that rather than two payments of £100,000, only one will be made — and that this will only be made after probate.

The executor of my parents’ will is a solicitor who has instructed the insurer to pay the money into a client account, which is part of his firm’s business account.

There are only two equal beneficiar­ies, myself and my brother. I feel both my queries — the paying of only one sum rather than two and the insistence on probate being agreed first — fall into a grey area.

We very much need this money to aid the payment of inheritanc­e tax so we can settle my parents’ estates and then finally have time to grieve. Can you help shed some light on this problem?

Anon. THE sudden death of both parents in a car crash is a tragedy hard to contemplat­e. I spoke to your husband, who told me the shock has taken its toll on all of you.

He said that on a car journey into Central London recently for a concert, you burst into tears every time you happened upon a minor motor accident or when an ambulance appeared. Your feelings are clearly still very raw; dealing with your parents’ insurer has added to this turmoil.

I could not tell from the policy terms you sent me why the payment was restricted to a single £100,000, so asked LV= to look again at your case. I asked specifical­ly why, if two premiums had been paid for the enhanced cover, two sums could not be issued.

A few days later, LV= came back with an explanatio­n. It said that while you were right that your parents both had £100,000 extended personal accident benefit on their multi-car policy, the insurer’s claims handler was correct to say it would normally make only one payment.

A spokesman says: ‘ This is because the policy stipulates a limit of £100,000 per accident, irrespecti­ve of the number of people involved. While we understand the couple had paid separate fees for the increased benefit, this is so both cars had the benefit in the event of each car having an accident.’

But the good news is LV= made an about- turn on its original decision and agreed to issue the double payment after all — and it will send it straight away rather than wait for probate to be settled on your parents’ estates.

A spokesman adds: ‘Due to the circumstan­ces and the fact we are reviewing how we treat claims of this nature where we insure multiple people in one accident, as a gesture of goodwill we are happy paying £200,000 to her and her family, and ahead of probate being received.’

LV= explains that probate is normally required — in line with guidance from HM Revenue & Customs — to help protect everyone involved. However, an exception is being made in your case as your parents’ executor is a solicitor. He will not only receive the money into a client account, but has the legal and profession­al duty to distribute funds appropriat­ely and everyone involved will also be protected under the firm’s indemnity insurance.

You were overwhelme­d to hear this and told me ‘it will help enormously to reduce the financial anxieties that have been keeping us awake, and also to reduce the awful bitterness that has crept in’.

A spokesman for LV= says: ‘We would like to offer our sincere condolence­s to [the daughter] and her family following the tragic loss of her parents. We appreciate this is a difficult time and would like to apologise for any further distress that has been caused as a result of this claim.’

There is also a claim under way against the other driver involved in the accident, who survived the crash. This is being pursued via the motor legal expenses insurance purchased with their car policy.

Another option in such circumstan­ces is to make a claim via a nowin, no-fee lawyer. Fees can be high for successful claims, though they are capped at 25 pc of any redress.

The success of any claim usually depends on whether survivors are dependants of the deceased.

Sometimes payment for reasonable funeral and headstone costs might be the only outcome. In England and Wales, a statutory bereavemen­t award of just over £15,000 is available following fatal accidents, but usually only to the surviving spouse or civil partner or to the parents of a child under 18.

The system in Scotland allows for a variable amount and can be more generous.

A FEW months ago, I received a letter from British Gas regarding a tariff being set up for a property I’d sold eight years earlier.

I am not sure how the company got hold of my current private address or my email, but the letters persisted and an account was set up online without my involvemen­t. I wrote to British Gas with supporting evidence to show I had sold the property and have no affiliatio­n with it, and asked it to close the account.

The company wrote back to apologise — but still I received emails about an unpaid quarterly bill for this year of £145.

I refuse to sign into its website and close an account that I didn’t set up. Now I have been contacted by a debt recovery company.

I don’t have access to the internet at home or on my phone. Please help.

S. F., Surrey. YOUR letter is one of many I receive, where energy providers’ mistakes with addresses trigger erroneous bills.

Most readers have an innate fear of debt collectors, or worse, bailiffs, and can end up expending a lot of energy — as you have — trying to resolve such blunders.

I asked British Gas to investigat­e. A few days later it came back to apologise and a spokesman said an adviser had made an error when closing down the rogue account after you complained.

The mistake has now been corrected and you should no longer receive any bills or other correspond­ence — or a knock at the door from a debt collector.

 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom