NHS BETRAYAL OF MOTHERS

▪ Four in ten women struggle to get help while giving birth ▪ More than half of maternity units fail to meet safety standards

PREGNANT women and new mothers are being abandoned by the NHS, a damning report reveals.

The number of women reporting they had a positive experience of maternity care has plummeted, the care regulator found.

There has been a ‘concerning decline’ in those able to get help from staff when they need it compared with five years ago, the care Quality commission (cQc) said.

exposing the crisis in Britain’s maternity services, the regulator’s report found that almost four in ten women struggled to get staff to help them while giving birth. More than half were not always able to get advice on feeding after being sent home with their newborn. And one in four said she was left alone by midwives and doctors at a time when she was worried during labour.

Women were also disappointed at the amount of time their partners could stay with them after the birth – and many reported they did not feel listened to after raising concerns.

The findings follow a series of nHS maternity scandals in which hundreds of mothers and babies died or suffered serious harm. inspections have revealed that more than half of maternity units are failing to meet safety standards,

HUNDREDS of doctors and midwives have signed a letter urging the NHS to scrap a £ 100,000 training programme to encourage use of terms including ‘chestfeeding’ and ‘human milk’.

The Maternity Gender Inclusion Programme is to be rolled out nationwide with a focus on improving maternity care for pregnant transgender patients.

But healthcare professionals have hit out at the proposals, accusing the NHS of ‘ideological capture’ by the trans lobby.

They argue that the push for ‘ inclusive’ language – such as ‘birthing parents’ instead of mother and ‘milk from the feeding mother or parent’ instead of breastmilk – could alienate other vulnerable patient groups while taking overstretched midwives away from wards.

They warned the NHS risked harming patients by repeating previous mistakes linked to trans lobbying, such as the Tavistock Clinic’s Gender Identity Development Service (GIDS) which was closed after a damning report found patients were often referred too quickly.

Yesterday more than 2,000

‘An ideological agenda’

people including 297 healthcare professionals, such as doctors, nurses and midwives, as well as hundreds more researchers and non- clinical staff, had signed a petition to withdraw the tender.

The letter, penned by maternity care advocacy coalition With Woman, said the programme was based on ‘flawed’ research with no clinical evidence pregnant trans patients suffered poor outcomes.

It warned health leaders that they risked another Tavistock situation.

The group wrote: ‘ Recent events at the Tavistock [GIDS] have shown how practice underpinned by poor research and the influence of advocacy organisations with a particular ideology has led to a scandal that we do not want to see repeated in maternity services.’

The NHS contract specifically references the Improving Trans Experiences of Maternity Services (ITEMS) project commissioned by organisations including NHS England, the Department of Health and Public Health England to study experiences of trans and non-binary birthing people.

The research suggested that trans and non-binary birthing parents often concealed their gender or trans status in order to more safely navigate their care and to avoid transphobia. Following a pilot last year at the University Hospitals Sussex NHS Trust’, the NHS is looking to roll out the training to at least 40 NHS maternity services.

Rebranding its maternity department as ‘perinatal services’, it claimed ‘gender identity can be a source of oppression and health inequality’.

But midwives said the profession was already ‘ absolutely committed’ to personalised care and it was already ‘woven in’ to guidelines.

One midwife, who asked to remain anonymous for fear over her job, said colleagues were very concerned by the proposal – which was based on research that lacked independent evaluation or assessment on how it could impact on non-trans patients and other disadvantaged groups.

She said: ‘ To give £100,000 on the basis of this really rather kind of shoddy piece of work appears to us to be not based on improving outcomes for mothers and babies, but based on driving an ideological agenda.’

An NHS spokesman said: ‘The NHS has paused this programme while we look into its scope and so that it is based on the latest evidence.’