Daily Mail

We’re powering ahead for 2030

Shapps vows to stick with petrol and diesel car axe – five years ahead of EU

- By Harriet Line Deputy Political Editor

BRITAIN’S ban on new petrol and diesel cars will still take effect from 2030, despite Europe watering down its own restrictio­ns, the Energy Secretary confirmed yesterday.

Grant Shapps said the UK did not have to follow the EU, which has climbed down to allow sales of new internal combustion engine cars that only run on ‘e-fuels’ to continue after 2035.

Brussels on Tuesday approved a law to end sales of new CO2emittin­g cars in the EU in 2035 – but Germany won an exemption for vehicles which burn carbonneut­ral petrol alternativ­es.

The EU law will require all new cars sold to have zero CO2 emissions from 2035, and 55 per cent lower CO2 emissions from 2030, versus 2021 levels. Britain has a policy to halt sales of petrol and diesel cars and vans from 2030. After that hybrids will be phased out so all new cars and vans are fully zero emissions by 2035.

But, despite reports the UK was considerin­g following the EU’s lead by also allowing an e-fuel exemption, Mr Shapps yesterday insisted Britain’s policy would not change.

The Energy Secretary told reporters: ‘I appreciate the German car industry has its own particular take on this. We have set out our path which is by 2030, the end of the sale of pure petrol and diesel.

‘There is then a five-year transition period which we’ve yet to describe in detail... and also, as mentioned in here, they will wrap-up the ZEV (Zero Emission Vehicle) mandate, which is the number of zero cars you can sell before you sell regular cars.

‘All of that remains the same. We will always have a look at what is developing or happening elsewhere, but our policy does not change as a

‘We are sticking with our plans’

result.’ He added: ‘ Our plan at the moment does not have an exemption for E-fuels, but there is that five-year period to deal with as well...

‘This is not a change of policy – we are sticking with our plans. We are not in Europe, we don’t have to do what Europe does on this stuff – we’ve always been more forward leaning on this stuff than the EU.

‘That’s been the case up until now and I suspect we will want to be more forward leaning on all of this stuff.’

Mr Shapps will today publish his Powering Up Britain energy security plan – on what is being called ‘Green Day’ – with a range of measures to deliver cleaner, more affordable energy sources to power the UK.

There are plans to expand renewables by speeding up the planning process to enable the building of more solar power and offshore wind projects.

Mr Shapps will announce locations for the first Carbon Capture, Utilisatio­n and Storage (CCUS) projects in the UK. The Government has already pledged to invest £20billion over the next 20 years to drive forward projects that aim to store 20-30 million tonnes of CO2 a year by 2030 – equivalent to the emissions from 1015 million cars.

The energy plan comes less than a year after the last one, suggesting ministers do not believe they have yet done enough to improve the

UK’s energy security in the wake of the Ukraine war. Prime Minister Rishi Sunak said that the plans would ensure ‘affordable, clean energy from Britain, so we can drive down energy prices and grow our economy’.

Thank God for the European Union. I never thought I’d write those words so I’ll do so again. Thank God for the EU.

admittedly it’s not usually a repository of prudence. I could give examples of Brussels behaving badly, not least over the northern Ireland protocol. But on one issue, at least, it is showing a glimmer of good sense.

On Tuesday, the EU approved a ban on the sale of new petrol and diesel cars from 2035, five years after the Uk. Brussels will also allow internal combustion engines after 2035 provided they use environmen­tally friendly ‘ e-fuels’. The British Government has made no such allowance.

Twisted

Evidently the powerful German automobile industry has leant on its politician­s, who have twisted the arms of bureaucrat­s in Brussels. German carmakers love fast cars, and they dream of their wondrous machines roaring down the autobahns, powered by e-fuels.

Our own dear politician­s have no such hopes. They are backing electric cars to the hilt, and have decreed that, in a mere seven years, new petrol and diesel cars will no longer be in the showrooms.

But might e- fuels be an alternativ­e to electric cars? I have no technical expertise in this area, but for a number of reasons it seems a question worth asking.

according to Baroness Brown, interviewe­d on Radio 4’s Today programme yesterday morning, e-fuels are so expensive that they could never be adapted to ordinary cars. She is a scientist with a background in engineerin­g, and may well know her onions. She is also greatly worried by climate change.

a very different view is offered by andrew Graves, a car industry expert and a professor at Bath University. he says that e-fuels are an ‘exciting technology we cannot only use for motorsport but for keeping existing vehicles on the road’.

Mr Graves adds that ‘there’s a lot of things that the Government needs to look at before it goes hell-bent on just having a blanket ban of diesel or petrol’. It was Boris Johnson, of course, who announced the 2030 cut- off, apparently without much thought about the consequenc­es for the rest of us.

naturally, I hope that Mr Graves is right and Baroness Brown is wrong. One doesn’t need a PhD in engineerin­g to grasp that electric cars are not everything they have been cracked up to be.

nor do I forget that the man who has specialise­d in apocalypti­c warnings about climate change — king Charles — told us last year that he runs his aston Martin on ‘surplus English white wine and whey from the cheese process’. There may be more things in heaven and earth than are dreamt of in Baroness Brown’s philosophy.

One thing is clear: electric cars are ruinously expensive to buy. You’ll be lucky to have much change from £40,000 for a half- decent one, and can easily pay much more. as greater volumes are manufactur­ed, the price may fall.

People used to say that, although they cost much more to buy, electric cars are far cheaper to run. With the sharp increase in the price of electricit­y, this may no longer be the case.

Indeed, a recent analysis by the RaC suggested that electric cars are more expensive on the road than petrol ones. Charging to cover 484 miles on a public network cost £ 92.69, while filling a 55-litre petrol car to travel the same distance worked out at £83.03. however, charging at home remains cheaper than buying fuel.

Then there is the difficulty of finding charging points in the right place. as a driver of a petrol car, I have never endured this inconvenie­nce, but I’ve read articles about anxious drivers hunting for that elusive charging point before their car conks out.

We should also consider the likelihood that electric vehicles are not as eco-friendly as their proponents claim. The batteries consist of materials such as nickel, lithium and cobalt, which are energy-intensive to mine. The electricit­y they use may be produced by gas, which isn’t considered green.

Maybe it will work out all right in the end, and in ten years’ time we will be cheerfully driving our inexpensiv­e, energy-efficient, environmen­tally friendly electric vehicles. I wouldn’t count on it, though.

The truth is that our rulers have staked the farm (that’s us) on this policy in doublequic­k time, and there’s absolutely no guarantee their bet will come off. It certainly didn’t the last time they tried.

I’m thinking of the Great Diesel Disaster. a quarter of a century ago, politician­s and car manufactur­ers conspired to induce us to buy diesel cars, which emit about 15 per cent less carbon dioxide than equivalent petrol models.

Debacle

In 2001, Gordon Brown as Chancellor lowered Vehicle Excise Duty for diesel. he also reduced the tax on diesel at the pumps to encourage motorists to switch from petrol. Diesel was good. Diesel was green.

Except it wasn’t. Diesel cars emit vastly more nitrogen oxide and nitrogen dioxide than petrol cars — which is why their owners are now being charged to drive older ones in London and other cities. They are being penalised for doing what the Government and carmakers encouraged them to do.

Might the headlong drive to make us buy electric cars finish in a similar debacle?

Could there be a flaw in the plan — environmen­tal or financial — which will end with us picking up the pieces?

I don’t know. What I do know is that the decision to dispense with all new petrol and diesel vehicles in just seven years has been taken without any considerat­ion for the pockets of ordinary people.

Our political elite has forgotten its previous cock-up over diesel. It blithely issues a decree that commits us to as yet unproven electric cars, and sticks a pin more or less at random in the wall calendar.

Disruptive

That’s why I applaud the EU. at least it has provided five more years before the guillotine comes down. By permitting the use of e-fuels, it has kept alive the possibilit­y that there might be a practicabl­e, less disruptive alternativ­e to electric vehicles that is suitably green.

I wish the Government had the nous to follow the EU’s example, though yesterday Energy Secretary Grant Shapps said it won’t. Today, he will unveil his latest thoughts on net zero.

hard-pressed drivers deserve a break, as does the wilting British car industry. It will find it harder to attract investment when factories in Germany and France are still turning out petrol and diesel models.

Couldn’t our imperious Government — not to mention the eco-warriors breathing down its neck — show a little more good sense, as the EU has? This country is believed to be responsibl­e for a mere 1 per cent of all global emissions.

according to official figures, transport accounts for a quarter of the Uk’s emissions. So we are talking about 1/400th of the world’s production of greenhouse gases. Meanwhile, China and India scarcely take a blind bit of notice. They certainly don’t spike their own guns.

Brussels is right for once. But we could go even further. now we are out of the EU we can chart our own course. abandon the self- destructiv­e 2030 deadline, and think afresh.

 ?? ??
 ?? ??
 ?? ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom