Daily Mail

... but Chequers probe police put Boris in the clear

- By Political Editor

BORIS Johnson was last night cleared of ‘malicious’ allegation­s that he breached further lockdown rules.

Police rejected fresh ‘evidence’ submitted by the Cabinet Office after ruling it did not meet the threshold for investigat­ion.

The developmen­t is a vindicatio­n for the former Prime Minister, who had always insisted the claims were ‘totally untrue’.

And it is humiliatin­g for the Cabinet Office, which stunned Westminste­r in May by secretly submitting the dossier of new Partygate claims to the police.

A friend of Mr Johnson last night pointed the finger at Deputy Prime Minister Oliver Dowden, a close ally of Rishi Sunak.

‘It shows how malicious it was of the Government to drag those diary entries out and hand them over to the police without asking what they were,’ the source said. ‘It was a very hostile act by Dowden and co.’

Mr Dowden is in charge of the Cabinet Office but has always denied involvemen­t in the decision to go to the police, which is said to have been taken by officials.

A Cabinet Office source said last night it was ‘total nonsense’ to suggest Mr Dowden had been involved in the decision, adding that he was ‘pleased’ Mr Johnson had been cleared. The source added: ‘Civil servants had contacted the police before ministers were aware of a concern with Boris’s diaries and by that point there was no choice. This was always raking over old coals and they are pleased a line has been drawn under this.’

Government lawyers who were supposed to be helping Mr Johnson prepare for the Covid inquiry went behind his back to raise concerns with the police about entries in his official diary.

Officials highlighte­d 16 occasions at No 10 and Chequers where they believed the attendance list suggested lockdown rules could have been broken.

Cabinet Office minister Jeremy Quin then submitted the claims to the Commons privileges committee which was investigat­ing Mr Johnson at the time over allegation­s he lied to Parliament about lockdown parties in No 10.

To Mr Johnson’s fury, the referral was made without officials first making contact to discuss the events in question.

He insisted that all of the events had an innocent explanatio­n and were within the Covid rules in place at the time.

Government sources claimed the material was so damning that officials had ‘no choice’ but to report it to the police.

But in a statement at the time, a spokesman for the former PM said he was the victim of a ‘politicall­y motivated stitchup’.

The source added: ‘The events in question were all within the rules either because they were held outdoors or came within another lawful exception. They include regular meetings with civil servants and advisers.It appears some within government have decided to make unfounded suggestion­s both to the police and to the privileges committee.’

The final decision to hand over the material to the police was taken by Alex Chisholm, permanent secretary at the Cabinet Office. The following month he was handed a knighthood for public service.

The decision to go to the police triggered speculatio­n that Mr Johnson would face further Partygate charges.

But in a joint statement, Thames Valley Police and the Metropolit­an Police said they were taking no further action.

The two forces said they had examined the diary entries and ‘sought some further clarificat­ion’ before deciding they ‘do not meet the retrospect­ive criteria for reopening the investigat­ion’.

The Met issued 126 fines over Covid-19 rule breaches in Whitehall and Downing Street while Mr Johnson was prime minister. Mr Johnson and Rishi Sunak, who was chancellor at the time, paid fixedpenal­ty notices over a gathering for Mr Johnson’s 56th birthday.

 ?? ?? Chequers quiz: Questions were raised over events attended by Boris Johnson
Chequers quiz: Questions were raised over events attended by Boris Johnson

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom