Daily Mail

As they gather to defend the Cenotaph, do these ‘football supporters’ really know the complex relationsh­ip betweenwar and sport?

- by Jonathan McEvoy

THERE are two ways of doing this. Two ways of showing some considerat­ion for the dead of the world wars of the last century and other conflicts.

Sport, by observing silences before matches and by the wearing of poppies, demonstrat­es how it can and should be done. Plans, revealed in these pages, for a thousand football hooligans to ‘ team up’ to ‘ protect’ the Cenotaph from pro- Palestine protesters this weekend, detail how not to do it.

Specifical­ly, as Mail Sport reported, moves are afoot for over- zealous nationalis­ts to descend on the capital this weekend. No matter where one’s sympathies lie, it is clear these actions inflame antagonism at a delicate stage in world affairs.

Frankly, it sounds like any excuse for a ruck and those of you who have ever attended football matches have seen this kind of thuggery break out at a thousand railway stations. Sport’s intended role, at the risk of sounding naive, should be to act as balm, as a way of channellin­g innate urges, not as aggravatio­n.

Football’s stance cannot be hidden from public view, however much the bureaucrat­s running the game would like to believe it possible. That much was illustrate­d last month when the FA refused to commemorat­e the brutal murder of Israelis by hamas by lighting the Wembley arch.

They were rightly dubbed ‘spineless’ and ‘weak’ for the omission, when they had marked the invasion of Ukraine, terror attacks in Paris and Pele’s death in such a manner. In fact, they banned anyone from wearing Israel kits or bringing in Israeli flags for england’s friendly against Australia. how much this played into the hands of the far-right is not difficult to understand.

‘Twice in a single generation,’ said Winston Churchill in his speech to the US Congress, ‘the catastroph­e of world war has fallen upon us.’

Sport, sometimes too slowly, answered those calls. We all know a bit of this by looking at the honours board at our local sports clubs and seeing the blanks for the years 1939-1945, as the lifeblood of the nation was redirected from games to a more serious calling, namely war.

NOT that this was uncomplica­ted. For example, it has always been my belief that english football was denuded of an entire cast of potential champions by our national sport’s tin-eared decision to play on for a long period during the Great War of 1914-1918, as the manhood of Britain fought and died.

Several schools, then the cradle of sport as it grew into an organised recreation across the world, disaffilia­ted themselves from football and signed up for rugby.

But on how football was damaged by losing forever a swathe of society, you might reasonably ask how well rugby has fared since. Just one World Cup triumph in the most lavishly funded union in the world, is the answer. So two fingers to that theory!

Anyway, time to bring in Field Marshal Lord roberts, the Victorian who said, in almost his final utterance on August 29, 1914: ‘how very different is your action to that of the men who can still go on with their cricket and football, as if the very existence of the country were not at stake! This is not the time to play games, wholesome as they are in times of piping peace. We are engaged in a life and death struggle.’

This was a call to the 1,600strong battalion of royal Fusiliers, comprising businessme­n from the City of London, not long after Lord Kitchener urged: ‘ Your Country Needs YOU!’

The move to bring in sportsmen intensifie­d in early September of that year with the assistance of Arthur Conan Doyle. An amateur footballer in his youth and an MCC member, the Sherlock holmes author showed his detective instinct by urging: ‘If the cricketer had a straight eye, let him look along the barrel of a rifle. If a footballer had strength of limb, let them serve and march in the field of battle.’

THE cry was answered. of 5,000 profession­al footballer­s, more than 2,000 went to war. Several hundred died. Tottenham staff signed up and 11 perished. Newcastle lost seven men. hearts paid a terrible price on the first day of the Somme, that most awful of dawns on July 16, 1916. harry Wattie, Duncan Currie and ernie ellis all fell. Crushingly, Paddy Crossan was put down for a leg amputation. he begged his surgeon: ‘I need my legs, I’m a footballer.’ he died aged 22.

Leyton orient lost three players and West ham five. The story was widespread, from north to south,

These actions inflame antagonism at a delicate stage in world affairs

Sport’s intended role should be to act as balm, not as aggravatio­n

and not confined to football. one in six profession­al cricketers who went to war died.

One of those who perished was Colin Blythe, a brilliant left-arm spinner. he had taken 100 wickets in 19 Tests. Shell-fire on a railway line during the Battle of Passchenda­ele did for him on November 8, 1917.

rugby union, which was perceived to have had a ‘ good war’, saw england captain ronnie Poulton-Palmer killed by a sniper in 1915. Twenty- seven england internatio­nals lost their lives, 30 Scottish and 11 Welsh.

That was the barbarity of one of the worst of all wars. Tom Finney, who played on blithely aged 17 at the start of the second great horror that was to befall mankind in 1939, came to be enlisted.

At 20 he was called up, in April 1942, as a trooper in the royal Armoured Corps, serving with distinctio­n in egypt in Montgomery’s eighth Army and still playing football. omar Sharif was an unused sub in one game featuring the Preston Plumber.

None of it is easy and sport at times dropped the ball, while at other moments it excelled.

But, really, is football, after so much glory and some regrets, best served by historical­ly blind fans arguing the toss at the Cenotaph?

 ?? ?? Mail Sport’s story this week which warned that football hooligans are on the march
Mail Sport’s story this week which warned that football hooligans are on the march

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom