Derby Telegraph

The missed chances and missteps that led to ‘possessive’ husband’s brutal killing of Sohbia

- By EDDIE BISKNELL Local democracy reporter eddie.bisknell@reachplc.com

A LITANY of missed opportunit­ies from multiple authoritie­s dominated the years leading up to a Derby man brutally murdering his wife, a damning report has revealed.

Atual Mustafa beat his second wife Sohbia Khan to death in late May 2017, in Pear Tree Crescent, Normanton.

Mustafa, 36 at the time, was jailed for life in May 2018, for the murder and sentenced to a minimum of 32 years in jail. The savage attack left Sohbia with 36 injuries.

This incident had occurred around a month after Mustafa’s marriage to Sohbia through the Muslim practice of nikah.

In February 2008, Mustafa, also previously known as Amir Mustafa, had been convicted for assaulting his first wife and over a four-day ordeal subjected her to a prolonged series of “sadistic” assaults, repeatedly punched her, shaved off her hair and eyebrows, set her on fire and threatened to kill her.

The treatment and supervisio­n of Mustafa by a range of authoritie­s following his 2008 conviction and leading up to the 2017 murder is the subject of a new independen­t report.

This 105-page study was commission­ed by NHS England and carried out by Niche Health and Care Consultant­s. It details chilling details about Mustafa’s past, his assessment­s by officials over the years and a number of missed opportunit­ies, missteps and miscommuni­cation.

This includes a repeated “overrelian­ce” by health officials on Mustafa to disclose concerns about his own behaviour and mental state – and risks he may pose to others.

It also includes a repeated insufficie­nt amount of considerat­ion given to the risk he specifical­ly posed to women, along with the impact stress has on his violent behaviour.

Psychologi­st notes in a report durstresso­rs ing Mustafa’s time at Wathword Prison, Rotherham, shortly before his transfer to Cygnet Hospital in Derby in early 2013, tell in detail the risk he poses.

The prison psychologi­st had written: “There is a risk of psychologi­cal and emotional abuse within the context of an intimate relationsh­ip.

“This may typically involve, although not restricted to; implicit threats of harm or violence, intimidati­on, insults, excessive monitoring of behaviour, isolating behaviour or withdrawal from supportive networks, financial abuse and using male privilege, all of which will render his partner’s life fearful and miserable. These behaviours are likely to increase when, for example, [Mustafa] feels insecure, criticised or jealous. Psychologi­cal and emotional abuse will likely start as soon as [Mustafa] perceives he ‘possesses’ his partner, like the very start of a marriage for example.”

This report was written four years before Mustafa murdered Sohbia, whom he had married in her absence just four weeks before. The marriage process was called a nikah and involved Mustafa and two friends as witnesses. It is not clear if Sohbia was present, but tradition states this is not required.

Mustafa collected Sohbia from her home in Bradford and her family never saw her again.

Mustafa’s brother and sister both saw Sohbia on May 27, the day she was murdered, with the brother saying he had seen her wearing a headscarf obscuring her face, and the sister saying she had been repeatedly asked to stay longer by Sohbia.

The report also details there was no evidence that concerns of Mustafa’s first victim were taken into considerat­ion in the decision to move him from Rotherham to Derby. She opposed the move due to still having family in the city, a point Mustafa continued to lie about, saying she did not. This was never checked by the authoritie­s, the report says.

A theme throughout the report is the lack of attention paid to potential

that could cause Mustafa to relapse, and potentiall­y hurt women.

Stress in his personal and family life were seen as triggers, noted in assessment­s throughout 2015, including in July when he was discharged from Cygnet to community care monitored by Derbyshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust.

He was discharged from hospital to live on his own for the first time in seven years, to the house at which he committed the 2008 assault on his first wife. It was in need of renovation due to disrepair. Months before, his father died after illness.

A January 2015 risk assessment, a few months before Mustafa was discharged into the community, con

cluded he was “likely” to commit emotional or physical abuse against a partner or ex-wife. It also said a “new relationsh­ip should trigger reassessme­nt of risk”.

In monthly assessment­s, from April to July, one detailed: “If engaged in a close relationsh­ip and there was deteriorat­ion in his mental health state, there would be a high probabilit­y that he would engage in acts of violence against his partner within a couple of months.”

Mustafa was later found to have started his relationsh­ip with Sohbia around the same time he was discharged, after being in jail and hospital for almost a decade.

In June 2015, the month before his discharge, Mustafa had told officials about his anxiety over the house repairs and said he heard his father’s voice in his head.

The report found health officials involved in his care had no knowledge of his relationsh­ip with Sohbia, which led to their marriage in April 2017.

It says: “That he was able to develop a relationsh­ip, cohabit and marry without the knowledge of any of these services raises questions about the quality of supervisio­n provided, and illustrate­s the extent to which he was able to conceal his behaviours from services.”

The report says the service from Derbyshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust was handled by a general team, with no specialise­d forensic team set up at the time for complex cases geared towards potentiall­y violent offenders in the community.

An internal report from the trust, included in this review by Niche, concludes these staff “had little clarity, direction, support or supervisio­n in terms of their roles, responsibi­lities and accountabi­lity in [Mustafa’s] care”.

One of the key takeaways in the report is a crucial missed opportunit­y, Niche says, relating to a sexual relationsh­ip Mustafa conducted with a health care worker at Cygnet Hospital in Derby.

The worker disclosed the relationsh­ip herself in October 2014, due to her fear of Mustafa. She was fired and the emphasis of reports at the time was that Mustafa was the victim, due to his mental health status.

What failed to be disclosed to the Ministry of Justice, the report says, was the staff member’s evidence. The report reveals she said Mustafa grabbed her phone while on escorted leave from hospital and took her number. She said Mustafa told her he had bugged her house, had her watched and smashed her phone.

It details, from a Cygnet internal review, that Mustafa’s “manipulati­ve and intimidati­ng and threatenin­g behaviour in the relationsh­ip should have been seen as coercive and controllin­g”.

Three months later, in January 2015, the Ministry of Justice, unaware of the behaviour of Mustafa during the relationsh­ip with a staff member, agreed to a period of overnight leave from Cygnet to his parents’ house in Derby.

Shortly after his discharge and for much of the four months from August 2015 to January 2016, Mustafa was allowed to go to Pakistan to visit family. His father was ill and died on Christmas Day.

Mustafa had initially been given leave to go to Pakistan for a few weeks, before returning. After that he was given leave to go for six weeks, but instead chose to book a four-month trip.

The report says Mustafa had a “pattern of pushing boundaries” at Cygnet and in community healthcare, along with trying to ingratiate himself with staff. This and the nature of the relationsh­ip with the staff member may have meant the Ministry of Justice would not have approved the initial Pakistan trip, the report suggests.

A damning indictment in the report’s conclusion­s is that officials placed too much of a burden on Mustafa to reveal his own issues, which may have in turn seen him brought back to hospital.

It also says officials relied on Mustafa’s family to flag and identify concerns, instead of focusing on scrutinisi­ng him themselves.

The report says: “There was an unrealisti­c expectatio­n that the family would tell the clinical team about his developing a relationsh­ip or not taking medication. His sisters and brother told us that they asked him about both of these issues, and were told aggressive­ly that they should mind their own business, and he had told people what they needed to know.”

An internal report by Derbyshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust, referenced by Niche, says the impact of the transition from hospital to the community for Mustafa was “underestim­ated”.

It also says there was a lack of appreciati­on that the trip to Pakistan should have been seen as a “significan­t event that would test his [Mustafa’s] coping mechanisms”.

An assessment of Mustafa in October 2015, on his brief return from Pakistan, said his violence towards women was directly influenced by his mental health.

Over the months in which Mustafa’s father was seriously ill and then died, there was a repeated lack of any investigat­ion of Mustafa’s mental state, the report details.

The report says health officials at Derbyshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust were unaware whether there would be specific cultural dynamics to consider after the death of his father – when he became head of the family.

Mustafa’s family told the reviewer after he became head of the family he was “volatile and physically violent, unpredicta­ble and aggressive”.

Cygnet also did not inform Mustafa’s GP about the crimes for which he was convicted in 2008, meaning they were unaware of his healthcare needs.

The report says Mustafa gave his GP a “highly sanitised” version of events in March 2015.

It also finds it “concerning” that Mustafa was described in an interview with them by senior Cygnet clinicians as a “perfect patient” who “had not put a foot wrong”, apart from the relationsh­ip with the member of staff.

The report says the “pattern of pushing boundaries” at Cygnet was at odds with the assessment of Mustafa being a “perfect patient”.

This includes him manipulati­ng a female member of staff who was managing an authorised escort. This involved him getting into a car with his brother and asking for a lift back to the hospital along with the female member of staff.

It also includes being found with a smart phone in his ward, breaching the number of nights per week in which he could stay outside hospital, lying about helping out his parents when they had already gone to Pakistan, and frequent breaches banning him from being alone with children. The latter breach included Mustafa being listed as the point of contact at the schools at which his nieces and nephews attended.

The report says there was a “degree of skill in successful subversion of boundaries at Cygnet and in the community under the care of Derbyshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust” and that this was “not always communicat­ed or addressed effectivel­y”.

That he was able to develop a relationsh­ip, cohabit and marry without the knowledge of any of these services raises questions about the quality of supervisio­n provided

 ??  ?? Sohbia Khan and how the Derby Telegraph has reported the case of her murderer, Atual Mustafa
Sohbia Khan and how the Derby Telegraph has reported the case of her murderer, Atual Mustafa
 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom