Digital Photographer

GROUP TEST

-

This issue we test and review four affordable super-tele zooms from the likes of Nikon, Sigma and Tamron

Photograph­ers can be a greedy bunch. However much telephoto reach we have, we often hanker after a little more, and there are various ways of achieving this. The starting point for most of us is to buy either a 70-200mm f2.8 or 70-300mm f4-5.6 tele zoom. You can boost the former to 400mm with a 2x tele-converter, or gain an effective 450mm focal length by mounting the latter on an APS-C format body (480mm for Canon).

Another option is to buy a wellestabl­ished super-tele zoom like the

Canon 100-400mm or Nikon 80-400mm. However, if you are used to shooting with a 70-300mm lens on an APS-C format camera, and have moved up to full-frame, you might still feel a bit short-changed when it comes to outright reach. Next up are the Canon 200-400mm and Nikon 180400mm lenses which feature built-in 1.4x tele-converters, but they’re monstrousl­y expensive at around £11,000/$12,000 apiece, and monster prime lenses also tend to be very pricey.

Offering a more manageable and affordable solution, Sigma and Tamron have pushed the boundaries with their recent 150-600mm super-tele zooms. Nikon has responded with a 200-500mm lens which, while it doesn’t quite match the others for zoom range or maximum reach, isn’t far off. And the Nikon is similarly competitiv­e in terms of price.

One thing you won’t get with a zoom lens that’s sufficient­ly lightweigh­t for handheld shooting, yet stretches to 500mm or 600mm, is a ‘fast’ aperture rating. This makes image stabilisat­ion an absolute must. It’s featured in all of the lenses in this test group, apart from the Sony A-mount edition of the Tamron, which relies on incamera stabilisat­ion instead. Let’s take a closer look at what the current contenders have to offer.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom