ELLE (UK)

Do you really need your PERIOD?

Ditching your period can lead to better mental health, less pain and more productivi­ty. If you could safely stop yours, would you? Laura Sampedro puts it to the test

-

‘HOW DO YOU FEEL ABOUT YOUR PERIOD?’ The question, posed by my neurologis­t as she dutifully explored new ways to treat my migraines, sent me down a spiral that landed me in the early 1990s. My period debuted when I was in Year 8, and made quick work of turning my favourite pair of jeans into a crimsonhue­d Rorschach test. I spent the rest of my first day as a woman wearing my PE kit from the waist down, learning the true meaning of shame. At school, I feared my heavy flow so intensely that I never left home without a backpack full of maxipads so large they could double as water skis. By the time I was at university, brutal cramps, intense back spasms and cold sweats ushered in my biblically heavy period each month. My housemates took turns handing in my work whenever I was too ill to go in, and I leaned into my tutors’ assumption­s that I was just another hungover student. The truth, somehow, felt worse. By my mid-thirties, migraines became the checkered flag that signalled the arrival of my period. And while medication helped lessen my migraines’ frequency and severity, there was still one particular­ly paralysing headache that always showed up on race day. ‘It’s my Waterloo,’ I whined in response to the doctor’s question. To my surprise, she responded by asking if I’d feel comfortabl­e just eliminatin­g my period and, hopefully, the migraines that came with it. ‘I can do that?’ I asked, in the excited pitch usually reserved for the recently engaged or children opening Christmas presents. ‘You can do that,’ she replied, setting aside a prescripti­on pad. ‘It’s not that hard.’ Addressing period eliminatio­n (or ‘menstrual suppressio­n’) is impossible to do without wading into the mysterious­ly murky waters of hormonal contracept­ion, some forms of which (the Pill, patch and ring) remain the most effective medication­s for regulating periods and their side effects. Contracept­ion provides the body with synthetic versions of progestero­ne and oestrogen, the ovarian

hormones released when the body is pregnant. Think of progestero­ne and oestrogen as the bouncer and clipboardw­ielding door attendant for Club Uterus, working to keep the ovaries from releasing any new eggs and strengthen­ing the endometriu­m so that additional sperm never make it inside. When an egg is not fertilised, the bouncer and door attendant go off duty, causing the drop in progestero­ne and oestrogen that leads to the uterine shedding its lining (your period). Avoiding that hormonal dip by taking continuous contracept­ion is the key to turning off your period, and could provide a significan­t degree of relief for women suffering from conditions as wide-ranging as asthma, rheumatoid arthritis, endometrio­sis, diabetes, polycystic ovary syndrome, anaemia and depression, among other mental health issues. People with physical and developmen­tal disabiliti­es who have difficulty coping with the hygienic needs of periods – or who may be dependent on others for care – have had the option of suppressin­g their period for decades with no record of sustained physical side effects. So why is it not more common for people dealing with other physical and mental hardships? Or those of us who simply can’t take it any more? ‘If you’re not trying to make an embryo, there’s no point to bleeding,’ says Dr Sophia Yen, CEO and co-founder of contracept­ive mail order service Pandia Health. ‘This incessant menstruati­on is a modern construct.’ It’s only in the past 100 years (ironically, with the advent of contracept­ion) that women have come to experience an estimated 350 to 400 periods in their lifetime. As contracept­ive pioneers Elsimar M Coutinho and Sheldon J Segal noted in their 2001 book Is Menstruati­on Obsolete?: ‘As recently as [the 19th century], women had an average of eight children, with long periods of lactation between frequent pregnancie­s.’ Putting that into context, Yen asks, ‘How many periods do you have when you’re pregnant? Zero. How many periods do you have when you’re exclusivel­y breastfeed­ing? Zero.’ Prior to the industrial revolution, a woman may have only experience­d perhaps 100 periods, because she was either pregnant or breastfeed­ing for the majority of her fertile years. ‘Relatively speaking, [these women] were menstruati­on-free compared to their descendent daughters just a few generation­s later, who average fewer than two children,’ Coutinho and Segal wrote. If history has given us the precedent for eliminatin­g periods, science is now backing it up with evidence that it’s beneficial – the less frequently we menstruate, the lower our chances of developing reproducti­ve cancers. ‘Why are we building and sloughing, building and sloughing? Every time we build, we risk endometria­l cancer,’ Yen says. ‘When we pop out an egg, we’re risking ovarian cancer. And why are we doing this for 10 [to] 20 years pre-baby, then another 10 to 20 years post-babies – if we’re not trying to make a baby?’ Even John Rock, Gregory Pincus and Min Chueh Chang, architects of the modern contracept­ive pill, acknowledg­ed in

“If you’re not TRYING to make an embryo, there’s no point to BLEEDING”

1958 that women could presumably create a menstrual cycle of their own desired length while on the Pill, yet chose to introduce the idea of a hormone-free ‘placebo’ week to the cycle, believing that women would be reassured by the arrival of their period. Rock, a devout Catholic, hoped that by preserving menses he could finally obtain the Catholic Church’s approval of the Pill, arguing that married couples could partake in church-sanctioned ‘natural’ birth-control practices like the rhythm method by using a woman’s cycle as their guide. But in 1968 Pope Paul VI declared that all ‘artificial’ methods of contracept­ion, including the Pill, were against the church’s values. Despite improvemen­ts, the 28-day cycle with a placebo week remains the template for most Pill iterations, leaving the Catholic Church’s fingerprin­ts all over the medication it continues to reject more than 60 years later (despite its potential to minimise pain and suffering). For Yen, who specialise­s in adolescent medicine, turning off your period has another upside: it gives women and girls a greater opportunit­y to succeed where they may otherwise be held back. ‘I ask any parent of anybody with a uterus, “Is your young person going to do better [in exams] bleeding or not bleeding? At football, bleeding or not bleeding? At their Olympic swimming competitio­n, bleeding or not bleeding?”’ she says. ‘It’s about competitiv­eness. It’s about equality.’ The divide does appear to fork around the time that periods come into play. ‘Starting at puberty, boys and girls start to separate in terms of their mental health experience,’ says reproducti­ve psychiatri­st Dr Uma Lerner. ‘Girls and women have higher incidences of depression and anxiety, and all of that begins with puberty, which shows that women’s hormones and their repression make a big difference in our mental health.’ These early experience­s can have a lasting impact. When I had my debilitati­ng periods, I often skipped parties and other opportunit­ies to socialise with my peers (to say nothing of missed classes and the constant fear I harboured of accidental­ly unleashing a flotilla of sanitary towels while pulling out a school book). ‘So much is missing when we talk about girls’ academic performanc­e compared to boys’ and girls’ confidence rates, but we don’t account for the fact that girls are dealing with a lot of physical issues that [are still shrouded in] stigma,’ Lerner adds. In my case, it took three years of migraine treatment before my doctor even mentioned the possibilit­y of eliminatin­g my period – and only after I’d tried multiple medication­s, altered my diet, taken supplement­s, had vitamin injections, taken thrice-yearly blood tests and begun keeping a weather journal. It was another two years of experiment­ing with contracept­ion and going head-to-head with my period before I started to feel better. And, while my neurologis­t is still diligently working to make me 100% migraine-free, I’m happy to report that my life’s biggest headache – my period – is finally in my rearview mirror.

 ??  ??

Newspapers in English

Newspapers from United Kingdom